** UnhandledExceptionEventHandler :: OFFICIAL LC / CHATTER THREAD ** - Page 109 - Computer Technical Help

Two Plus Two Forums Other Topics Computer and Technical Help

** UnhandledExceptionEventHandler :: OFFICIAL LC / CHATTER THREAD **

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 109 of 1603

First

9 59 89 99 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 119 129 159 209 309 609 1109

Last

Page 109 of 1603

First

9 59 89 99 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 119 129 159 209 309 609 1109

Last

03-04-2012 , 05:45 PM

#2701

Neil S

King of the sidebar

Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 20,767

I don't agree with that. The choices are not perfect or useless. Security never works that way.

Quote

150% up to $2,000 Welcome Bonus on CoinPoker

Join the action now

Daily Rewards ? Splash Pots ? CoinRaces

03-04-2012 , 06:10 PM

#2702

gaming_mouse

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 13,786

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil S

I don't agree with that. The choices are not perfect or useless. Security never works that way.

i meant useless in the sense of "anything a human can read the AI can read too."

Quote

03-04-2012 , 10:21 PM

#2703

MrWooster

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,984

Quote:

Originally Posted by iversonian

Is there a very dominant community forum for programmers like 2+2 is for poker players?

More web design than programming, but this is a very active forum that I am a member of: http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/forum.php

Quote

03-04-2012 , 11:45 PM

#2704

jukofyork

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 11,749

Quote:

Originally Posted by greg nice

what the hell is the internet coming to

took me six tries to complete a forum search

Yeah +1

I seem to fail about 50% of the recaptcha captchas now.

Juk

Quote

03-05-2012 , 07:31 AM

#2705

MinusEV

Giftastic!

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 12,646

We're at the point where the people who work on AI to interpret captchas for spamming purposes would probably make more money by just selling them as captcha-readers to people desperately trying to figure out what they say.

Quote

03-05-2012 , 07:59 AM

#2706

wull

journeyman

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 216

lol yeah,
the new captcha test if you can't read it you gotta be human.

Quote

03-05-2012 , 09:36 AM

#2707

myNameIsInga

adept

Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 746

Anyone here do win32 development in Visual studio 2010? The lack of intellisense is really bothering me. Anyone know how to add that for c++/win32 in VS 2010?

Inga

Quote

03-05-2012 , 11:44 AM

#2708

MrWooster

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,984

Image based CAPTCHAs are really bad and there are much better ways of detecting auto submissions without inconveniencing the user.

Quote

03-05-2012 , 11:53 AM

#2709

Gullanian

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 14,014

Honeypots ftw, work super well for us. also just changing default registration/login page URLS if your using a forum/CMS is also incredibly simple and effective (we get hundreds of 404 requests to default pages for registration). We've added akismet on to our comment system as well and we're basically spam free now.

Quote

03-05-2012 , 12:09 PM

#2710

MrWooster

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,984

You could implement something similar to the CSFR checks. Embed a code in your 'registration' link, and only show the registration page if the code checks out. This would mean that you could only see the registration page if you have legitimately clicked on a 'register' link.

Quote

03-05-2012 , 12:17 PM

#2711

Gullanian

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 14,014

That's a cool idea hadn't thought of that, I would be a little nervous implementing something like that though in case people share registration links, but if you're inundated with spam it could be an idea

Quote

03-05-2012 , 01:03 PM

#2712

gaming_mouse

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 13,786

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrWooster

so would the reg-link be determined by IP addy, so that they could only get one valid reg link per IP that they had?

Quote

03-05-2012 , 01:05 PM

#2713

gaming_mouse

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 13,786

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gullanian

Hey Tom,

I looked up honeypots and found this: http://www.projecthoneypot.org/about_us.php

But I can't figure out what they are actually doing. Can you explain it?

Quote

03-05-2012 , 01:07 PM

#2714

Larry Legend

Celtic Pride

Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 42,243

Quote:

Originally Posted by _dave_

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/56...ngame-1112918/

And these botters are making "some" attempts to not get detected. If they had free reign it would probably be significantly worse of a problem.

Quote

03-05-2012 , 01:19 PM

#2715

greg nice

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 10,001

Quote:

Originally Posted by gaming_mouse

Hey Tom,

I looked up honeypots and found this: http://www.projecthoneypot.org/about_us.php

But I can't figure out what they are actually doing. Can you explain it?

i believe its a crowd sourced list of spammer IPs that you can just ban straight from your htaccess

edit/nevermind looks a bit different

Quote

03-05-2012 , 01:25 PM

#2716

clowntable

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 45,557

I only know the concept of honeypot from regular security. Basically it's a deliberate weak system that catches the bad guys.
Dunno if/how it applies to spam-bots but my guess would be you allow spam on some subsite and banhammer the spammers somehow.

Quote

03-05-2012 , 01:28 PM

#2717

MrWooster

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,984

Quote:

Originally Posted by gaming_mouse

so would the reg-link be determined by IP addy, so that they could only get one valid reg link per IP that they had?

The idea would be to have a link which looks like

Code:

http://example.com/register?check=[random code]

[random_code] would be a randomly generated hash that is also added to the users cookie.

When the user opens the 'registration' page, the 'check' parameter is tested for a) uniqueness and b) against the value in the user's cookie. If either a or b fail then the user is likely to be a bot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gullanian

This would def be an issue, but I guess you could always fall back on a CAPTCHA if the checks fail.

Quote

03-05-2012 , 01:35 PM

#2718

Gullanian

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 14,014

Wooster here's a blog post I wrote about honeypots and default pages:

http://www.scirra.com/blog/61/reducing-website-spam

And HN discussion:

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3300135

Quote

03-05-2012 , 01:49 PM

#2719

MrWooster

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,984

Thanks for the link. I think I remember reading that when you first posted it. Excellent article, using a fake 'username' input is a really great idea.

Quote

03-05-2012 , 01:51 PM

#2720

Larry Legend

Celtic Pride

Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 42,243

Have any of you guys gotten a degree from Harvard Extension School or hear anything about it?

I'm thinking I am going to go there for a masters in Spring of next year, I currently work within IT staffing, and I wanna get into IT.

Quote

03-05-2012 , 05:49 PM

#2721

clowntable

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 45,557

Last assignment done..500, weee
To answer the earlier question about the uglyness of class_eval...yeah it's that ugly. I felt the same when I used eval in a test.

Also Rspec test snippet from the last exercise:

Code:

it "should work for class Baz with methodname lolcat" do
    baz = Baz.new
    baz.lolcat = 'can i'
    baz.lolcat = 'haz'
    baz.lolcat = 'cheesburger?'
    baz.lolcat_history.should == [nil, 'can i', 'haz', 'cheesburger?']
end

Cause why not...I think I'll use lolcats in testing from here on out :P

Quote

03-05-2012 , 06:28 PM

#2722

clowntable

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 45,557

Also refactored hw1_3 to be less kludgy...time to start a new thread?

Quote

03-05-2012 , 08:10 PM

#2723

gaming_mouse

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 13,786

Quote:

Originally Posted by clowntable

Also refactored hw1_3 to be less kludgy...time to start a new thread?

doooo eeeet!

Quote

03-06-2012 , 02:41 AM

#2724

Neil S

King of the sidebar

Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 20,767

Quote:

Originally Posted by gaming_mouse

i meant useless in the sense of "anything a human can read the AI can read too."

An AI can.

Not all AIs can.

It's wrong to assume that you don't achieve anything at all unless your system is impregnable to all possible opposition.

Quote

03-06-2012 , 11:30 AM

#2725

MrWooster

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,984

Hey all,

I have finally finished updating my landing page and was hoping to get some criticism. Some of the 'content' was written late last night, and needs to be tweaked, but the design is finished.

My aim was to create a page that looks good, and that is easy to navigate. I want someone to be able to land on the page, and quickly find the information they are seeking.

Note: The page doesnt work in IE at the moment.

The page is at http://guy.ht

Thanks in advance