** UnhandledExceptionEventHandler :: OFFICIAL LC / CHATTER THREAD ** - Page 999 - Computer Technical Help

Two Plus Two Forums Other Topics Computer and Technical Help

** UnhandledExceptionEventHandler :: OFFICIAL LC / CHATTER THREAD **

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 999 of 1603

First

499 799 899 949 979 989 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1009 1019 1049 1099 1199 1499

Last

Page 999 of 1603

First

499 799 899 949 979 989 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1009 1019 1049 1099 1199 1499

Last

08-27-2016 , 11:08 AM

#24951

Grue

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 5,667

ITT very serious business.

fyi there's 125 people subbed to the clojure meetup group in my non tech hub city so there's that.

Quote

150% up to $2,000 Welcome Bonus on CoinPoker

Join the action now

Daily Rewards ? Splash Pots ? CoinRaces

08-27-2016 , 01:26 PM

#24952

KatoKrazy

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 4,623

We get unlimited vacation and most here take at least 3-4 weeks.

Quote

08-28-2016 , 03:36 PM

#24953

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 101,163

I feel like an idiot here. Isn't there some very easy JS one-liner to accomplish this? Map/reduce doesn't seem much simpler. Something else?

Code:

let detail;
if (response) response.forEach((agent) => {
  if (agent.basicDetails.id === id) {
    detail = agent;
    return;
  }
});

Quote

08-28-2016 , 03:53 PM

#24954

gaming_mouse

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 13,786

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99

I feel like an idiot here. Isn't there some very easy JS one-liner to accomplish this? Map/reduce doesn't seem much simpler. Something else?

Code:

let detail;
if (response) response.forEach((agent) => {
  if (agent.basicDetails.id === id) {
    detail = agent;
    return;
  }
});

this should be equivalent:

Code:

let detail = response ? response.find(x => x.basicDetails.id === id) : undefined;

Quote

08-28-2016 , 03:56 PM

#24955

Grue

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 5,667

Quote:

Originally Posted by gaming_mouse

this should be equivalent:

Code:

let detail = response ? response.find(x => x.basicDetails.id === id) : undefined;

No need for ternary. Also no IE support for find at all.

Actually nm depends on what response can be at that point.

Quote

08-28-2016 , 03:58 PM

#24956

RustyBrooks

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 24,646

Does javascript have something like python's 'next'? Because in python this is

detail = next([x for x in (response or []) if x.basicDetails.id == id])
or anyway, if you only expect one match, surely in JS you can say
detail = response.filter(function(x) { x.basicDetails.id == id })[0]
or something like that?

Quote

08-28-2016 , 04:03 PM

#24957

bex989

centurion

Join Date: Nov 2013 Posts: 153

I barely know any javascript, no idea what is going on. Is response variable a collection of agents? By checking for response with if statement you implicitly check if it's initialized and not empty?

Quote

08-28-2016 , 04:04 PM

#24958

gaming_mouse

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 13,786

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grue

No need for ternary. Also no IE support for find at all.

Actually nm depends on what response can be at that point.

yeah you need the ternary to replace the outer if. as for IE support, if you need it, just use a polyfill -- hobbling your code is not the right solution.

Quote

08-28-2016 , 04:07 PM

#24959

gaming_mouse

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 13,786

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustyBrooks

the filter solution should work too, but doesn't express intent as well as find -- otoh, it has better built in support so may be the best choice here.

Quote

08-28-2016 , 04:12 PM

#24960

Grue

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 5,667

Meh with browserify pulling in lodash to a file is easy enough as its more or less ubiquitous now.

Quote

08-28-2016 , 04:45 PM

#24961

Loki

binary duo

Join Date: Nov 2015 Posts: 12,772

Wife thinks I got a job offer, but I'm skeptical. Will hopefully know more soon.

Quote

08-28-2016 , 04:52 PM

#24962

RustyBrooks

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 24,646

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib

Wife thinks I got a job offer, but I'm skeptical. Will hopefully know more soon.

I am trying to imagine this. Wife thinks you got a job offer, but you think it was... what?

Quote

08-28-2016 , 06:17 PM

#24963

Loki

binary duo

Join Date: Nov 2015 Posts: 12,772

Offer to go past the first stages of interviewing

Quote

08-28-2016 , 06:32 PM

#24964

RustyBrooks

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 24,646

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib

Offer to go past the first stages of interviewing

Well let me help. If it doesn't have a dollar amount and a start date, it's not a job offer.

Quote

08-28-2016 , 08:18 PM

#24965

Loki

binary duo

Join Date: Nov 2015 Posts: 12,772

That's what I said, in exactly not those words

Quote

08-29-2016 , 01:10 AM

#24966

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 101,163

Quote:

Originally Posted by gaming_mouse

yeah you need the ternary to replace the outer if. as for IE support, if you need it, just use a polyfill -- hobbling your code is not the right solution.

It's node, so ES6 is fine. (Still can't do destructuring though).

Quote

08-29-2016 , 09:28 AM

#24967

Grue

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 5,667

destructuring is supported in node 6 standardly and node 5 behind a flag but yeah LTS

Quote

08-29-2016 , 01:35 PM

#24968

Loki

binary duo

Join Date: Nov 2015 Posts: 12,772

looks like i was right

Quote

08-29-2016 , 11:24 PM

#24969

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 101,163

If anyone here has a lot of react experience and might be interested in a full time or part time side gig, shoot me a PM.

Quote

08-29-2016 , 11:27 PM

#24970

Loki

binary duo

Join Date: Nov 2015 Posts: 12,772

Pretty liberal city, small business, developer in-person interview: if my hair is just a little too short for a pony tail, should I cut it all off?

It's massively impossible to style at the length it's at.

tia

Quote

08-30-2016 , 10:08 AM

#24971

codeartisan

centurion

Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 191

Quote:

Originally Posted by KatoKrazy

We get unlimited vacation and most here take at least 3-4 weeks.

Unlimited Vacation is a great PR strategy for companies that costs nothing as soon as they add the "need approval form manager, can't inconvenience clients" type clauses.

My first job after graduation in the UK in 1988 started with 5 weeks' vacation plus 8 public holidays. And the UK is typically on the lower end of European allowances.

Quote

08-30-2016 , 03:48 PM

#24972

goofyballer

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 70,719

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99

Apparently there are some US companies (according to El Diablo) which have unlimited vacation and people actually take like 6 weeks off - Euro style. I am skeptical that it's not a scam most of the time.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KatoKrazy

We get unlimited vacation and most here take at least 3-4 weeks.

I do too. I'm a bit of a workaholic so I don't go nuts, but sure, 6 weeks doesn't seem unreasonable and I'm sure some people at my company take that much. I'd probably like to do a long trip to Europe sometime next year and still take a normal amount of vacation around the holidays, and it's nice to know I can just do that if I want to without planning years ahead.

My last company originally had something standard-ish like 5-10 sick days a year (no rollover) plus 3 weeks PTO (with rollover), then changed it to give you like 2 extra PTO days and take away all the sick time. Boy was it fun to dip into PTO time when I got the flu.

Quote

08-30-2016 , 03:52 PM

#24973

blackize5

old hand

Join Date: Sep 2012 Posts: 1,358

My company has unlimited vacation. Very few people taking more than two weeks though. The 2 or 3 examples I can think of are all executives.

My team probably averages two to three weeks when you tally up all the long weekends. Other folks more than one rung below our execs are probably talking one week, if that.

Quote

08-30-2016 , 04:07 PM

#24974

goofyballer

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 70,719

Why so little???

Quote

08-30-2016 , 04:13 PM

#24975

KatoKrazy

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 4,623

You'd be surprised if you just take more.

Try taking 4 weeks instead of two, and when everyone else sees there is no repercussions, it could change the culture a bit.