Yes i am suggesting any recent detection developments along the lines of these topics;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immunohistochemistry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tumor_marker
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tumor_antigen
I was wondering if there are certain easy global markers that without being very conclusive at all they instantly suggest a doctor where to look next and the possibility of being somewhat alarmed at an early stage when the situation is not necessarily yet as gloomy. And of course if someone has other symptoms such as those described here if the situation is seen as advanced enough that such markers would have been evident and not seeing then might indicate this here is not cancer.
I could go on further to ask eg;
Are there recently any biochemical detection developments such as the above or other that in the absence of a well localized tumor visible in the typical diagnostic methods (lumps, scans etc) could hint to a doctor something is going on both for an early stage and a relatively advanced one?
How close are we to basically be able to detect cancer very early or at the very least detect elevated probabilities for such developments even if most of them prove not to materialize?
Are we in a position today or in the near future that regular annual (blood tests and more but not heavily invasive approaches) or other more frequent far less invasive approaches than blood tests can protect a heavily monitored person? Such approach could be financially inefficient for the general population though in the sense that the opportunity cost they present is prohibitive, you could use your funds to address other more demanding healthcare concerns at the present era of our civilization. So i do not want this detail to be a factor is offering me an answer although of course its a determining factor in large scale developments across all society.
How close are we for example to a world where your own home computer (in combination with your own genome study) can monitor your health probing eg your urine, saliva, sperm or even your occasional rare blood discharge when you wash your teeth. This last concept is futuristic and remote still (even completely unreasonable) but i was wondering if the cost was not an issue how plausible conceptually it would be for your own smart home in the future to constantly monitor you in non invasive manner using such simple approaches that can lead to a constant daily intelligent, statistically interesting almost continuous manner to probe someone without ever requiring any extensive conscious efforts such as those of regular invasive testing.
So how unreasonable does the above futuristic vision look today and how plausible on the other hand it is for someone who is extensively monitored today (eg a very wealthy test project individual) to detect cancer and other diseases (circulatory system related or liver, kidneys etc) very early eliminating any late stage surprises? If we did seriously care for a person and expenses were not a concern could we claim any substantial edge by carefully monitoring such individual ?
Last edited by masque de Z; 01-08-2013 at 02:03 AM.