Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
It’s a pretty sad site to behold such negativity.
Facts are negativity now?
So how about these apples....
05' Zydrunas.... 19.5 PER.. 0.149 WS/48.. #12 team defense.. lottery
90' Pippen........ 16.3 PER.. 0.087 WS/48.. #19 team defense.. nearly made Finals
10' Jamison.... 16.7 PER.. 0.122 WS/48.... #7 team defense.. 2nd Round loss
90' Pippen....... 16.3 PER.. 0.087 WS/48.. #19 team defense.. nearly made Finals
09' Mo Will...'.... 17.2 PER.. 2.3 BPM.. 0.165 WS/48.. 3.1 VORP.... #3 team defense
90' Pippen........ 16.3 PER.. 1.8 BPM.. 0.087 WS/48.. 3.0 VORP.. #19 team defense
05' L Hughes.... 21.6 PER.. 4.3 BPM.. 0.157 WS/48.. 3.7 VORP
90' Pippen.....'.. 16.3 PER.. 1.8 BPM.. 0.087 WS/48.. 3.0 VORP
TLDR: Jamison, Mo, Zydrunas and Hughes were superior offensively to 90' Pippen, while also having better team defense (the 90' Bulls had the #19 defense)
Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
This isn’t the only forum twd does this on as well.
The 2007 Cavs had the #3 defense and #2 rebounding team in the league, along with a 2-time all-star center, the future COY, and the acquisition of a 22/5/5 all-defender.
that's EASILY enough to be a top team in a weak conference that 1-star teams were routinely winning (Iverson, Dwight, Kidd)
Fans and media are simply massively misperceiving those Cavs.
Infact, lebron's 1 seeds from 09' and 10' had higher-ranked defenses than the 1st three-peat Bulls, with superior offensive 3rd options, and comparable offensive 2nd options to Pippen.
Ultimately.... Jamison, Mo, Zydrunas and Hughes were better offensively than 90' Pippen (stats above), while having better team defenses.. So Jordan had less help on both sides of the ball but nearly beat the champs in 89' and 90', while lebron was swept (07'), lottery (05'), or lost as the favorite (09' and 10').