Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
Pippen was what 3rd in the MVP the year MJ totally missed
Paul George was 3rd in MVP too
both are trash except George's stats are better
Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
you don't think MJ, one of the highest usages of all time, hurt his teammate's stats at all?
Did you look at the stats or are you making things up?
Pippen averaged 22.0 and 5.6 apg in 1994
This was nearly the same alongside MJ, and actually less than 1992 (21.0 and 7.0).
So Pippen and other teammates played to capacity next to MJ, and their stats increased from single-digit in 88' (pippen/grant/bj) to korver all-star by 94'.
Otoh, lebron cratered teammate stats, and no young players grew/increased alongside him
Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
you go from 1st option to 3rd and your usage drops, your stats are going to drop.
Klay averaged 20 ppg as the 3rd option alongside Durant, so Durant didn't reduce Klay's stats like lebron cratered Love and Bosh
And that's because KD gets elite stats by holding the ball for 4 minutes per game, while Lebron needs 8 minutes - so klay has 4 more minutes of hold-time alongside KD.. these are mathematical facts.. lebron's skill restriction to ball-dominance kills teammates. It's intuitive, and obvious fact... Supported by endless stats
Love and Bosh were stars and would've been dynamic players alongside MJ the way Klay was alongside KD.. Or worthy/parish alongside magic/bird.. or ginobili is viewed as a HOF, not a bum like Bosh/Love after playing with lebron.
Also, guys like Jamison, Hughes, Ingram, Rose, Crowder and others didn't go from 1st to 3rd option.. they remained the option they were, or went from 1st to 2nd
Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
Lebron didn't have the best team in 09' and 10'
In the regular season, teams play games and move on to the next team on the schedule - there's no time to strategize at all - that's why guys with massive holes in their game can win 60 games in the regular season, and then get exposed in the playoffs (lebron, giannis)
Stan Van Gundy said they wanted lebron to "dribble and get stats".. So Lebron's suboptimal style (no ball movement) is why he lost to a massive underdog like the Magic.
Lebron had the #3 defense and got 18 on 38% from Mo - that's enough to beat the #4 SRS Magic because MJ beat the #1 SRS Cavs with 15 on 40% from Pippen and the #11 defense.. MJ won with less because he employed a superior style that got more put of teams.
Ultimately, Lebron had an AAU skillset and didn't know how to play pre-2012 - that's why he lost as the favored 1-seed for 3 straight years (09-11')
Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
MJ had flawed teams, and lost. MJ had great teams and didn't really lose.
Lebron, Magic, Bird, Kareem - literally everyone - lost 5+ times with 1 or 2 seeds
Only MJ never lost with a 1 or 2 seed (6-0)
MJ only lost with low seeds or as an underdog, while Lebron lost many times with favored, high seeds... No comparison
Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
Lebron had flawed teams, and lost. Would you consider MJ that much worse if instead of losing/retire the MJ bulls lost to Houston in B2B finals? Or if he stayed on the team and they didn't win it all in 1999?
The 94' Knicks nearly beat Houston despite Ewing shooting 33%.. so the bulls would've swept Houston with MJ
Heck, the Bulls nearly beat the Knicks with pippen at 21 on 40%, so Jordan would've won easily in pippen's place AND beaten Houston.. Houston was aids and not a real champion.. the bulls would've been favored with Jordan and no pippen, and the biggest favorites ever with both
.
Last edited by 3balI; 10-19-2020 at 01:26 PM.