Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
...
if this was a reading comp question on the SAT you would've already gotten it wrong though, that's what we're trying to explain
Let's make it an LSAT question then:
Which of the following statements are true about Rush's statement:
i. He says/implies that you need consent to have sexual relations
ii. He says/implies that if you have consent then that is sufficient for sexual relations
iii. He says/implies that if you do not get consent for sexual relations that the "rape police" will come for you
A. i only
B. ii only
C. iii only
D. i & ii only
E. i and iii only
F. ii and iii only
G. i, ii, and iii
F. None of the above
I'm answering G. What is your answer?
Again, I don't agree with his implication or moral judgment, but I fully agree with his direct statements. What am I misreading in his statements themselves (again answer for the content and not the tone or morality that is driving these other views)?