I will also say that liberals have some fault; whether actually controlling this sort of thing is possible IDK, but the fault goes like this:

Liberals have portrayed guys like Romney, Jeb Bush, Rubio, Perry, so on as these terrible hitlers. Now, their policies would be super-regressive and would set our country back for years and years and whatnot, but they would at least (most likely) put together a good staff and do responsible things and lead the country in a respectable manner. So when an actual antichrist that could legitimately destroy the country (Trump) comes along, we have a 'boy who cried wolf' scenario.

This post gave me aids

Damn bro no need to troll me, have a good night.

"Friends Try to Dissuade Local Simpleton from Supporting a Dictator, Unsuccessfully."

So...basically a loud suicide on the heels of two attacks with gardening tools? Sounds like Deutschland is overrun with stooges.

Bluff, you're getting called a moron by an Indiana resident and domer. Re-evaluate.

It's not from lack of trying that casualties have been minimal.

This corn on corn hate has to stop

One of the dumbest, most annoying things about trying to have a serious discussion on this board is the constant "durr Nebraska corn hurr" ****. I would gladly take my intellect up against any one of you. I've been blessed with intelligence, have a college education and a lot of experience in business and in life outside of all that. It's always a joy to present a thoughtful post that simply gets quoted and replied to with some lame, tired ad hominem Nebraska-related attack. Well done, 2p2.

It also doesn't account for the attacks that have been thwarted, the resources devoted to thwarting them, or the massive rise in the surveillance state due to the newfound necessity of thwarting them.

Nor does it account for the spike in sexual assaults as a direct result of the influx of migrants.

The situation in Europe is not good.

This is a great post. Pretty much sums up how I feel. Except if I had my hand on the button I'd pick trump assuming Gary Johnson was not an option.

I don't get why you and everyone else don't have him on ignore.

And I don't understand why there's been ~0 discussion of Gary Johnson itt. That video he put out was awesome and I think I agreed with every single sentence of it. Seems like the only reason he can't win is because people think he can't. If you asked me a month ago I would have confidently said that there is ~0 chance I'll ever vote in my lifetime but I am going to register and vote for the first time ever just for him.

Condolences for your punter.

****

.

Basically what you're saying is, "I can't be bothered to learn why things currently work the way they do, therefore I vote to just blow up all that stuff and maybe it will be better!"

.

Well, when you just **** on another state using an implied ad hominem attack, I'd say that puts a little hitch in the righteous indignation of your giddyup.

And if I had a problem with your underlying point, I would have raised it.

It has happened time and time and time again. It has got to stop. Mine was uncalled for. So is everyone else's.

I think I'd have a real choice if Johnson was a truly viable third party candidate, but he's not, so whatever. I detest HRC and everything she stands for, but I struggle to construct any scenario under which I'd vote Trump. And, as others have pointed out, at least with Hillary, you know she'll run the government semi-competently, if a bit corruptly fiscally and a bit hawkishly and at times incompetently from a foreign policy perspective, whereas I have no confidence Trump understands (or cares to understand) even the smallest thing about domestic or foreign policy.

I don't get how this is even a choice.

It could be frustration boiling over from almost 7 years of posting here, but 1) people use the Nebraska thing as evidence that I'm a hick moron, which is in fact evidence of their own ignorance and 2) Nothing I can say in response is ever good enough for the New York-type yuppies that think that a large population means they alone have the knowledge and experience to have some sort of well-rounded worldview. As if I have never traveled. As if my standardized test scored weren't good enough to get into Harvard. As if I don't have a formal education. As if I don't have a lot of research and work experience. As if I don't spend half of my time reading things trying to learn more about the world.

There's a lot of rural Nebraska residents that don't leave the ranch and think they know how the world works. I am not one of them.

At the risk of blowing up my spot as a heartless *******, I'm pretty sure no one of consequence truly believes 1). It's just that busting balls is fun.

no corn in southern indiana, thank you very much. Only reason I'm here is for IU grad school so a bit disingenuous to link me with anything else Indiana tho

Help me out here, Sando; this article says migrants commit crimes at the same rates as europeans and sexual assaults are at a flat rate, adjusted for population increase--but there are annecdotes about women being afraid to exercise at night and police concern about crowd violence against migrants. Am I to take it the crime stats are forged as part of a conspiracy? But it's all so tabloid-style, how can you read this ****?

It's not fun for 7 straight years in every context possible. And the jokes aren't even funny. They're lazy and tired.