Quote:
Originally Posted by THAY3R
So you want superficial changes that don't really change things other than support political interests and agendas rather than practical solutions that significantly make a difference? All while giving the government more money and control?
This is why people say it's knee jerk, people are using a terrorist attack to justify removing citizens' rights without due process.
I don't think it's superficial. I think even if the first actual "change" is superficial it's still an important step towards making the real changes. I'm fully in favor to practical solutions that will make a difference. I don't recognize it as an either or situation.
I don't believe people should have the right to own a firearm and I want it removed. Nothing I have posted would suggest I want it to be done without due process. The illegality of certain types of guns does not infringe on people's 2nd amendment rights. We already have certain states making these distinctions and there's no reason it can't happen on a federal level even while the 2nd amendment is still in tact.