Quote:
Originally Posted by mantisshrimp
you are forgetting this is a boxing discussion..The only sport that the farther back in time you fought, the better you are compared to the present day athlete. Even though that is an obvious ****ing absurdity in literally every other sport..in boxing it is par for the course. No point in discussing this stuff...x vs y...who ever has the earlier birthday would win. If x birthday is > 20 years older than y, x would destroy y. repeat.
this is a pretty poor post.
Boxing hasn't had the same super-evolution of players as football or basketball because boxing has weight classes. Football linemen and WRs and such keep getting bigger and faster, but bigger doesn't matter in boxing because you'll always be fighting guys equal in weight to you.
Floyd and Manny mostly train in the same exact ways as guys did 30-40 years ago, or even further back in time. There has been no 'spread offense' or 'moneyball' or any revolution for boxing. Same techniques, same strategies for the most part. It's not like Floyd benefits from super-advanced training techniques, and he certainly doesn't have a crazy advanced diet/health regimen. From what I've seen, he eats like a normal person.
So there's no obvious reason he should automatically be any better than other elite guys at the same weight in the past (unlike an NFL lineman). In addition, boxing was much bigger as a sport in the past, and probably (citation needed, i guess) had a ton more participants, thus making the talent pool deeper. Today's elite athletes are more likely than in the past to play team sports or be off doing MMA.
With all that said, you're using a strawman and nobody in this thread or anywhere believes that every older fighter is the best. Nobody has said that except for you. Poor arguments, man.