Quote:
Originally Posted by littlekeed
The Invasion storyline was stupid because there wasn't enough talent on the WCW side to make it interesting. Ideally, the main feud would've been something like Sting/Goldberg/DDP/Booker/Steiner vs Austin/Rock/Taker/Kane/Angle but it probably wasn't very cost effective or even possible for WWF to grab the biggest WCW stars. When you have to move WWF wrestlers to the "invading" side that pretty much means the whole angle is a bad idea.
agreed. Sting was never gonna come to the WWF since he has hated vince for a very long time, but steiner and goldberg needed to be there. It wouldn't have been the most cost efficient move to buy out goldberg and steiner, but, having them would've given the WCW faction more legs and would've enabled them to do big big business. TBH I don't think that the angle was ever going to work well as Vince's ego was going to get in the way
Quote:
Originally Posted by gusmahler
Disagree. Rock, Austin, Hogan, I'll agree with. Rock/Austin had a higher peak than Hogan, but Hogan has longevity. Huge drop off from those 3 to Flair, then another huge dropoff to HBK. (The WWE was built around him when it failed badly.) He's simply not the draw that the other 4 were. HBK ahead of Hogan was Bowie over Jordan bad.
I'm gonna have to vehemtely disagree irt flair. I can certailny see an argument for HBK not being in the group, but Flair was massive for a lot of people in the 80s and his decade was more dominant then hogan's was in the ring(I think flair didn't hold the NWA belt for less then a year in total days in the 80s). Flair and Hogan were directed towards different audiences, but between them in the 80s it isn't even 1 and 1a, its 1 and 1 and thinking otherwise is just ignoring how massive Flair was back then