Quote:
Originally Posted by TheUntouchable
Doesn't 30 mean he was the last one in?? iirc, Shawn Michaels was the first to win the Rumble from the #1 spot.
when HBK won from the no1 slot, the run-in times were every 45 seconds or there about. He won the match in something like 36-40ish minutes. Flair won it from no4 and was in the match for over an hour
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ M.
Bret is good. Most people don't know that he wore those sunglasses to hide his eyes when he first came up because he was nervous doing promos and didn't want to show it. It's amazing how bad he was booked in WCW.
WCW was booking him to make the WWF look bad, that can be the only possible conclusion as they were handed a golden opportunity to utterly kill the WWF right there
Quote:
Originally Posted by darthrob64
flair is a reach because there were several people available at the time of pick, a number of which are still available, who have better records at carrying an organisation - particularly during periods when wrestling has been more popular
not.even.close. Flair was the no1 guy in the world from basically 81-93 and was still putting in good matches until his retirement with the occasional great match. Everyone always got into him, because, well, there probably isn't much difference between ric flair and richard fliehr.
This was a guy that was one of the first to get a 1m contract from a company+ house % bonus' and ppv bonus'. He was also the first person to have won the legit versions of the WWF and NWA belt.
Outside of either Hogan, Austin, or Rock who could draw the numbers that Flair did?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrane
It's just, yeah as a bookie VKM is absoluety the best.
honestly, there are better bookers then Vince. He's had some bit hits, but he's also grossly wasted talent. While he was booking some extreme highs, he has also been just as responible for some of the lows. Wrestling always goes through cycles, but lets also think of a lot of the bad gimmicks, storylines, and fueds that he's done