Quote:
Originally Posted by aejones
i mean, if you're manning, you're getting like 2/40m or 3/60m?
wouldn't you rather do like 3/40m or something and have your #3 receiver be that much better?
he obv can't really need the money
That being said, he probably doesn't "need" to make much of any money from NFL Salary in the next 3 seasons. So why not sign for the veteran minimum and allow his team to spend that money on other players?
I figure the NFL Players Union would never "allow" him to do something like that, but I always wondered that about mega rich players in sports. Why not just take a considerable pay cut, so your team can sign other players?
I saw two numbers for Peyton's net worth, $115m and $142m. Let's take the lower number and say his net worth is $115m now. So what's the real difference between retiring at $125 million net worth in 3 years vs. retiring at $150 million net worth in 3 years instead?
You're super loaded and completely set for life either way. Plus if you give your team a considerable discount, you'll be praised in the media and it will help your legacy. Then there's the added championship equity you provide yourself with the skilled players your team can now sign. Win more championship/s and that helps your legacy and increases your post-retirement earnings.