Quote:
Originally Posted by ClarkNasty
Oski,
I'm not going to debate it with you. I am, after all, a coward in everything I do in life. There were several post reports complaining (believe it or not, it's very rare that even the biggest trolls get more than a single complaint about any series of posts), and I concurred with them. Considering it was your 5th ban, all of them for some variant of trolling in your own special sort of way, it wasn't that hard of a decision.
You specifically invited discussion on this banning in your triumphant "I banned Oski" announcement. You did say the discussion should go in the Faq thread, but I don't want to clutter it.
Suffice it to say, you could not justify the banning on the basis you state. I would easily prove you wrong.
The baby-boy Karak who reported, actually came at this bro for no reason. 1300 posts into that thread (with only a handful being mine) Karak trolled me like the punk he is and I had not come close to being hostile or disrespectful to anyone.(Interestingly enough he had his post erased after I got banned. Nice.)
After that, little men came after me with their little potshots and I merely responded. I even bowed out of the thread for a day, but returned when I saw how boring it was in my absence.
This is why I decided that Nut Low was the answer, as Oski, just appearing in a thread constitutes "trolling" under your new MicroClark standards. I was saving myself, you, the forum and the internet with my sacrificial move to Nut Low.
Alas, now Nut Low is High and Dry.
Anyhow, as far as Oski goes, if people abided by the rules and didn't troll me endlessly by taking their little potshots at me, I wouldn't go after them. It's that simple. Go show me an instance where I attacked someone without getting attack. If you don't come at me, I get along fine with everyone. Just ask my grandson Spaulding! He and I are regular pals.
Last edited by Oski; 11-23-2011 at 04:06 AM.