NFL Week 12: lol redskins, lol bengals, lol Rivers, lol ELI, lol Jesus haters - Page 15 - Sporting Events and Fantasy Sports

Two Plus Two Forums Sports and Games Sporting Events

NFL Week 12: lol redskins, lol bengals, lol Rivers, lol ELI, lol Jesus haters

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 15 of 16

First

5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Last

Page 15 of 16

First

5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Last

11-27-2011 , 01:18 PM

#351

showerman9

adept

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 914

Quote:

Originally Posted by dryice420

i agree with this.. from what i took from viewing it, he stomped his foot like a child would when he got flagged for hitting the guys head on the ground. His foot happened to come down on a player. People are saying he was looking down but i really doubt it, I think it was just a "i didnt get my way" foot stomp. Plus i know its results oriented to say this, but they weren't wearing spikes so in my mind its much less of an injury risk. no more than a game for me and a hefty 100k-150k fine.

edit- do they take the money they miss from game checks and donate it to that nfl legends charity(or whatever it is they do with the straight fines)?

Not sure if you watched the play but he repeatedly shoved EDS's head and neck into the ground prior to stomping him.

Quote

11-27-2011 , 01:30 PM

#352

dryice420

old hand

Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 1,573

Quote:

Originally Posted by showerman9

Not sure if you watched the play but he repeatedly shoved EDS's head and neck into the ground prior to stomping him.

i said that in my post, but for clarification most people were talking about the "Stomp" rather than the head slam. for me if it was just the head slam it should just be a fine, but in combination i think that 100-150k fine and 1-maybe2 games is fine. that is as long as they DO in fact donate the game checks like they do the other fines.

Quote

11-27-2011 , 02:17 PM

#353

nath

the second coming of the second coming

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 69,119

No problem with Suh getting a long suspension. The problem here is his history of behavior and apparent unwillingness to change it as much as it is the single incident.

Quote

11-27-2011 , 02:49 PM

#354

Victor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 77,657

Quote:

Originally Posted by NameOnTheCake

one game is fine imo

easily this. it wasnt that bad at all.

Quote

11-27-2011 , 03:02 PM

#355

chim17

Snowboarding concerts and punk music

Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 56,128

Priors matter.

Quote

11-28-2011 , 01:15 AM

#356

STA654

Here's some straight talk

Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 21,072

my playoff predictions with sunday games over

Quote

11-28-2011 , 01:17 AM

#357

chim17

Snowboarding concerts and punk music

Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 56,128

Clearly missing Tebow.

Quote

11-28-2011 , 01:33 AM

#358

rmthawk64

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 15,644

Quote:

Originally Posted by chim17

Clearly missing Tebow.

Spoiler:

Quote

11-28-2011 , 05:07 AM

#359

R_Webb18

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 6,762

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d...headline_stack

Quote

11-28-2011 , 05:17 AM

#360

vixticator

clutch

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 117,339

Wtf you are all nuts that think it should be more than two. For 3+ you need to have either a prior suspension or it has to be completely brutal like Haynesworth. Suh needs to get his **** together though. He ****ing kills us with bull**** penalties all the time.

Quote

11-28-2011 , 05:38 AM

#361

Kneel B4 Zod

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 27,952

Quote:

Originally Posted by showerman9

Its not about how dangerous the incident was its about the blatant disrespect he has for the game, the league, the other players and the fans.

I'm pretty sure it's mostly about that. (and history of similar stuff)

how many games did Desean Jackson get suspended for when he threw the ball at the Giants sideline? b/c that was pretty disrespectful to a whole bunch of people.

Quote

11-28-2011 , 05:44 AM

#362

vixticator

clutch

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 117,339

It absolutely should be about danger and only danger. People "disrespect" the game all the time depending on your personal definition. That should not be suspendable. What Suh did was moderately dangerous but in a vacuum is just eject + large fine. His history makes it a suspension.

Quote

11-28-2011 , 06:18 AM

#363

SMIGLET

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 14,838

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kneel B4 Zod

how many games did Desean Jackson get suspended for when he threw the ball at the Giants sideline? b/c that was pretty disrespectful to a whole bunch of people.

that was just awesome. all of deseans celebrations are amazing tbh. the falling star against the cowboys is my favorite

stevie johnsons blaxico imitation against the jets was pretty sweet too, def in my top 5

Quote

11-28-2011 , 06:19 AM

#364

AcTiOnJaCsOn

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 24,773

Quote:

Originally Posted by vixticator

It absolutely should be about danger and only danger. People "disrespect" the game all the time depending on your personal definition. That should not be suspendable. What Suh did was moderately dangerous but in a vacuum is just eject + large fine. His history makes it a suspension.

Im almost positive all players wear metal spikes. considering how much he weighs and how much force hes applying to the guys arm, thats super dangerous. Fact that it was on purpose and w/ his history obv makes it a ton worse.

Quote

11-28-2011 , 12:12 PM

#365

maulaga58

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 2,048

If Bengals beat polamalu less steelers and qb less texans they will hold tiebreaker over jets.

Quote

11-28-2011 , 12:14 PM

#366

Victor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 77,657

they will be dogs in both games

Quote

11-28-2011 , 12:17 PM

#367

maulaga58

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 2,048

Quote:

Originally Posted by Victor

they will be dogs in both games

They wont be dogs home against texans

Quote

11-28-2011 , 12:23 PM

#368

Victor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 77,657

ya i guess not. they need to win 4 games to lock up a playoff birth. 3 would make it pretty likely. sched is @pitt, hou, @stl, ari, balt.

mebbe they box into the ravens resting week 17.

Quote

11-28-2011 , 12:26 PM

#369

maulaga58

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 2,048

Quote:

Originally Posted by Victor

ya i guess not. they need to win 4 games to lock up a playoff birth. 3 would make it pretty likely. sched is @pitt, hou, @stl, ari, balt.

mebbe they box into the ravens resting week 17.

nah pats will win out to keep pressure on. Only team resting will be bengals if they win next 4. which is around 40 percent

Quote

11-28-2011 , 12:33 PM

#370

Victor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 77,657

lol 40%

Quote

11-28-2011 , 12:34 PM

#371

Seadood228

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 30,346

Broncos hold the tiebreaker over the Bengals, which could prove important.

Quote

11-28-2011 , 12:36 PM

#372

Victor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 77,657

broncos have a much easier schedule too

Quote

11-28-2011 , 12:46 PM

#373

maulaga58

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 2,048

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seadood228

Broncos hold the tiebreaker over the Bengals, which could prove important.

Broncos will definitely lose to pats which would give bengals a 2 game lead. Bengals are playing to have a bye week 17 this week> If Bengals would just take care of buisness. They played totally horrible yesterday though. I was extremely disappointed. Marvin has been managing games alot better this year though.