NFL Week 11 SE Group Rankings & Discussion Thread - Page 2 - Sporting Events and Fantasy Sports

Two Plus Two Forums Sports and Games Sporting Events

NFL Week 11 SE Group Rankings & Discussion Thread

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 2 of 19

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 12

Page 2 of 19

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 12

11-18-2014 , 12:13 PM

#26

LetsGambool

banned

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 26,568

Quote:

Originally Posted by Salva135

1. Packers
2. Pats

But the Pats go to Lambeau in two weeks so we don't even have to speculate too much longer. <3 this NFL schedule, so much information this year. All the good teams are playing each other.

Yeah, we can probably still speculate lol one game sample size.

Browns release Ben Tate, wonder if Colts give him a look rather than ride or die with T-Rich

Quote

11-18-2014 , 12:20 PM

#27

Caldarooni

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 25,000

Too bad the trade deadline passed and we are robbed of what Irsay would have given for Tate

Quote

11-18-2014 , 12:38 PM

#28

Salva135

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 6,045

Quote:

Originally Posted by LetsGambool

Yeah, we can probably still speculate lol one game sample size.

Browns release Ben Tate, wonder if Colts give him a look rather than ride or die with T-Rich

Obviously, but the outcome of that game is a pretty huge piece of information about the relative strength of the teams, ldo... that's all I meant

Quote

11-18-2014 , 12:44 PM

#29

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 48,255

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caldarooni

Too bad the trade deadline passed and we are robbed of what Irsay would have given for Tate

A waiver claim? He was cut today

Quote

11-18-2014 , 12:50 PM

#30

Kneel B4 Zod

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 27,952

Quote:

Originally Posted by Salva135

Obviously, but the outcome of that game is a pretty huge piece of information about the relative strength of the teams, ldo... that's all I meant

as someone who in 2010 watched

Patriots 45, Jets 3

and 1 month later in the playoffs

Jets 28, Patriots 21

I'm not sure how you are cool with putting a ton of weight into the outcome of one game

Quote

11-18-2014 , 12:56 PM

#31

A-Rod's Cousin

banned

Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 37,130

ITT we learn that teams that finished high in the standings last year had a tough schedule this year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by LetsGambool

Browns release Ben Tate, wonder if Colts give him a look rather than ride or die with T-Rich

This reminds me of when Wooderson claimed 3 years ago that Ben Tate was just as good as Arian Foster.

I think I have:
GB
NE
Den

Godgers just too good. A Godgers-Manning or Godgers-Brady Super Bowl is what we need this year after having to stomach a bunch of ****ty prime time games.

Quote

11-18-2014 , 01:00 PM

#32

LimpDitka

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 4,234

Quote:

Originally Posted by RT

NE
GB
DEN

DAL
KC
SEA
IND
PHI

ARI
CLE
SF

Something like that. First three are in order, others are just grouped

Cleveland top 10, good troll

Quote

11-18-2014 , 01:01 PM

#33

LetsGambool

banned

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 26,568

BB vs Fat Mike means I got
1) NE
2) GB

Blount also apparently went home early last night, so he might end up available as well.

Quote

11-18-2014 , 01:05 PM

#34

LimpDitka

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 4,234

New England
Green Bay
Denver
Arizona
Seattle
Indianapolis
Philadelphia
Dallas
Baltimore
K.C. Chiefs

Quote

11-18-2014 , 01:11 PM

#35

pwnsall

CFBBPC

Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 66,211

kansas city
green bay
new england
denver
seattle
indy
miami
baltimore
arizona
san francisco

Quote

11-18-2014 , 01:28 PM

#36

wheatrich

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 21,447

so blount left the game early b/c he got 0 carries last night.

Do these running backs realize that they're all nearly out of a job? I realize they're not getting the farm anymore from free agency but the next draft is loaded @ RB. There's way more supply than demand. Shut up act professional and stick as long as you can ffs.

Quote

11-18-2014 , 01:31 PM

#37

dkgojackets

DKGOAT

Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 86,120

lol professional youre talking about the guy who punched someone in college because he lost and has practically been kicked off three teams

Quote

11-18-2014 , 01:32 PM

#38

digables

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 15,756

Browns waive Ben Tate

Quote

11-18-2014 , 01:34 PM

#39

loK2thabrain

Tiger > Jack

Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 23,204

Quote:

Originally Posted by RT

Gronk is good. He's no BB, but he's good

The anti Brady camp just loves pumping up BB. Dude's great but you're pouring it on pretty thick.

Quote

11-18-2014 , 01:37 PM

#40

dlk9s

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 22,499

Quote:

Originally Posted by LetsGambool

BB vs Fat Mike means I got
1) NE
2) GB

The coaching discrepancy in that matchup is simply astounding.

Then again, maybe the new contract has FREED FAT MIKE and the genie has come out of his bottle.

Quote

11-18-2014 , 01:38 PM

#41

Joffrey

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2012 Posts: 226

Rodgers, Watt, and Gronk for "dragon with three heads."

Quote

11-18-2014 , 01:44 PM

#42

Salva135

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 6,045

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kneel B4 Zod

as someone who in 2010 watched

Patriots 45, Jets 3

and 1 month later in the playoffs

Jets 28, Patriots 21

I'm not sure how you are cool with putting a ton of weight into the outcome of one game

Not sure what we are arguing here. Two teams whose relative strengths we are speculating about actually playing each other on the gridiron is more useful to us than not playing at all. No need to analyze that statement further? I'm not putting a "ton of weight," but I might put a little, no?

Quote

11-18-2014 , 01:53 PM

#43

Kneel B4 Zod

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 27,952

Quote:

Originally Posted by Salva135

here is what you said:

Quote:

the outcome of that game is a pretty huge piece of information about the relative strength of the teams

doesn't sound like "a little" to me

Quote

11-18-2014 , 01:54 PM

#44

digables

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 15,756

Blount mad he's not nearly as good as Le'Veon Bell

Quote

11-18-2014 , 01:57 PM

#45

outdrawed

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Dec 2012 Posts: 3,707

RT,

two weeks or so ago you said the highest you could put KC was fringe top 10 because of their QB/HC. Neither of those have changed, and now you have KC 5th. Why the change in heart?

Quote

11-18-2014 , 02:09 PM

#46

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 48,255

Quote:

Originally Posted by outdrawed

RT,

two weeks or so ago you said the highest you could put KC was fringe top 10 because of their QB/HC. Neither of those have changed, and now you have KC 5th. Why the change in heart?

They aren't 5th, I said the teirs below the first weren't ordered. THey're somewhere in the 4th-8th spot.

Nothing has really changed other than the rest of the teams proving fallible. I still have zero faith in them winning in the playoffs for the reasons stated. If they played IND tomorrow in Arrowhead, I'd expect a decent game. Lots of JC/Davis rushing, lots of Luck passes, a few wasted TRich runs, and a few awful attempts at downfield passing by KC. I'd think the game wold be more or less even.

Edit: And I think to be fair I said you cold plug them in at 9/10 and forget about them, or something similar

Quote

11-18-2014 , 02:11 PM

#47

Namath12

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 55,849

Quote:

Originally Posted by wheatrich

Saw something yesterday about Beast Mode not going to the locker room at halftime and scurrying out of the locker room post game to avoid the press, speculation was that of possible butthurt over not being asked back next year.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...d-at-halftime/

Also him flipping off fans who wanted a snapshot (possible nsfw if boss finds middle finger offensive).

Spoiler:

Quote

11-18-2014 , 02:14 PM

#48

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 48,255

#TeamBeefMoe

(Should be a little nicer to fans imo, but they put up with a lot)

Quote

11-18-2014 , 02:16 PM

#49

Goodie

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 5,694

Quote:

Originally Posted by Salva135

Obviously, but the outcome of that game is a pretty huge piece of information about the relative strength of the teams, ldo... that's all I meant

No it isn't. Salva, I'm gonna try not to be harsh like I normally am with you. One game in pretty much any sport never, ever, gives a HUGE amount of information about the relative strength of anything.

Quote

11-18-2014 , 02:19 PM

#50

Salva135

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 6,045

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goodie

If I take away the word "huge" and instead say that two teams actually playing each other in real life gives us a piece of analytical information, will that make you go away?

Quote

Page 2 of 19

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 12

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 2 of 19

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 12

Last