NFL Week 10 SE Group Rankings & Discussion Thread - Page 5 - Sporting Events and Fantasy Sports

Two Plus Two Forums Sports and Games Sporting Events

NFL Week 10 SE Group Rankings & Discussion Thread

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 5 of 29

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 25

Last

Page 5 of 29

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 25

Last

11-11-2013 , 06:25 PM

#101

Riverman

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 73,129

Quote:

Originally Posted by maulaga58

wins over lions,pats,arodpack 2 of 4 losses in OT

Well the close losses are far from a coincidence. Marvin is a ****ing idiot. And he is not going anywhere.

Quote

11-11-2013 , 06:25 PM

#102

chim17

Snowboarding concerts and punk music

Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 56,128

lol me line already moved.

Quote

11-11-2013 , 06:25 PM

#103

fanmail

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 32,698

Car is -2.5

5dimes has the different lines by juice

Quote

11-11-2013 , 06:26 PM

#104

chim17

Snowboarding concerts and punk music

Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 56,128

Anyways point remains at 8.5. Where Assani has KC ranked he must be backing up the truck.

Quote

11-11-2013 , 06:28 PM

#105

five4suited

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 9,026

much cooler story from the rob ryan bar visit page:

Ex-Jazz ball boy selling Jordan’s shoes from infamous ‘Flu Game’

Quote

11-11-2013 , 06:29 PM

#106

waldo027

veteran

Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 3,084

2:54 2nd & 25, SD31
Ryan Mathews rushed to the left for 4 yard gain
2:06 3rd & 21, SD35
Philip Rivers passed to Keenan Allen down the middle for 2 yard gain
1:10 4th & 19, SD37
Mike Scifres punted, no return

Coaches do this type of stuff all the time on very-long-to-go situations. They figure the drive is over and they don't want to risk a turnover. I wonder how many effective points they're setting on fire by calling plays that have a 0.000001% chance of converting. Call a high-variance play like a RB screen that has a real chance of converting at least.

Quote

11-11-2013 , 06:30 PM

#107

Kneel B4 Zod

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 27,952

betting odds I see still have DEN with the lowest SB odds, though I'm inclined to disagree with that.

I think SEA is just as good as DEN - FO has DEN better, ANFLS has SEA better, Pythag has SEA better, SRS has DEN better. I think it's close between these teams. NFC is way tougher but SEA is in a way better spot wrt playoff positioning and have a bigger HFA.

Quote

11-11-2013 , 06:31 PM

#108

fanmail

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 32,698

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kneel B4 Zod

Those prob have more to do with the other nfc/afc teams than anything.

Quote

11-11-2013 , 06:32 PM

#109

TalkingDonkey

RIZZAHHHHHH

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 17,137

Quote:

Originally Posted by waldo027

Quote

11-11-2013 , 06:33 PM

#110

chim17

Snowboarding concerts and punk music

Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 56,128

Quote:

Originally Posted by fanmail

Those prob have more to do with the other nfc/afc teams than anything.

Ya. Den would be a bigger favorite as of now in every respective game than sea. NFC is just a lot better. If Rodgers was healthy difference would be absurd.

Quote

11-11-2013 , 06:36 PM

#111

Kneel B4 Zod

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 27,952

Quote:

Originally Posted by fanmail

Those prob have more to do with the other nfc/afc teams than anything.

yeah but NO on the road is a whole different/worse team - such a massive difference between SEA @ NO and NO @ SEA, way more than the difference in any standard home/home difference.

GB is likely not making the playoffs.

so the path I see for SEA is not as tough as it may appear at first glance. SF and CAR are big threats but no more than NE is for Denver.

Quote

11-11-2013 , 06:36 PM

#112

chim17

Snowboarding concerts and punk music

Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 56,128

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kneel B4 Zod

Meh this might be right. I feel like NO would be ok but no reason to think that

Quote

11-11-2013 , 06:54 PM

#113

sixfour

should be called sevenfour

Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 75,520

Quote:

Originally Posted by waldo027

I mean you may as well take at least one shot 40 yards down the field, even if it gets picked it's nearly the same as punting

Quote

11-11-2013 , 06:55 PM

#114

D104

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 18,255

interesting stat re: time of drives

here are the Eagles' drives:

they don't have a single td drive over 4 mins, which is less than 4 teams avg drive length

also, holy crap broncos 40 tds

Quote

11-11-2013 , 06:59 PM

#115

chim17

Snowboarding concerts and punk music

Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 56,128

How many non TD drives do they have over 4 minutes?

Quote

11-11-2013 , 07:02 PM

#116

D104

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 18,255

Quote:

Originally Posted by chim17

How many non TD drives do they have over 4 minutes?

6

4 fgs, one turnover on downs @ opp 32, and the 9+ min drive to seal the game against GB

Quote

11-11-2013 , 07:05 PM

#117

chim17

Snowboarding concerts and punk music

Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 56,128

Quote:

Originally Posted by D104

6

4 fgs, one turnover on downs @ opp 32, and the 9+ min drive to seal the game against GB

Thanks.

Pretty interesting.

That 9 minute drive was awesome.

Quote

11-11-2013 , 07:11 PM

#118

TalkingDonkey

RIZZAHHHHHH

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 17,137

i'm sure you can still find plenty of people willing to argue chip's offense won't work in the NFL

Quote

11-11-2013 , 07:14 PM

#119

MrWookie

Don't Call Me Meredith

Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 94,159

Quote:

Originally Posted by TalkingDonkey

i'm sure you can still find plenty of people willing to argue chip's offense won't work in the NFL

Throwing bombs to wide open racists isn't exactly a Chip Kelly invention.

Quote

11-11-2013 , 07:15 PM

#120

shaft88

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 6,569

posted this in the wrong thread:

Can any panthers fans shine a light on why chris gamble retired? Didn't want to take a paycut? He was always pretty good right?

Quote

11-11-2013 , 07:19 PM

#121

nath

the second coming of the second coming

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 69,119

Maybe part that, maybe part he wanted a life after football. He'd already played nine years; if he was smart with his money (6/53 with $23m gtd in 2008, and he saw all but the last year of his deal) he probably felt like it wasn't worth the grind to get paid closer to the veteran minimum.

Quote

11-11-2013 , 07:32 PM

#122

LetsGambool

banned

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 26,568

Quote:

Originally Posted by 72off

to be fair, i think he's saying that in the context of (if you remove the 5 QB runs) the Colts running the ball 9 times for 2 yards yesterday. i think most coaches would be saying "we got to run better" after a game like that.

Maybe, but they say some version of that every week even though Richardson is ****ing awful.