We could all take your words for it and not say you're wrong, but see it as something for which to look, as opposed to anything near a relative projection.

I could be thinking of this wrong, but let's say Stafford does nothing unexpected, more or less, but DET's D is a 30-PPG abortion and they go 6-10. Let's say you know this is going to happen; do you trade Stafford for the pick on the board that you know Manziel won't pass? Bridgewater?

Not saying there's a right or wrong answer, and I may be thinking of this the wrong way, but this is how I'm looking at the NCAA guys we can confidently project to enter the NFL and I wouldn't make this trade.

He was the de facto GL back at NC State. At Madison, his pass:rush attempt ratio was almost 4:1, but he didn't throw often. He was handing off to Ball a ton.

He did have a ~73% CMP rate and 33 TDs with 4 INTs, though. I've never seen the numbers, but loleyetest-wise, his bootleg play was elite.

Russell ran 79 times for 338 yds at Wisky, 4.3 ypc, 6ish rushes per game.

If anything that Rustle Wisconsin team massively under achieved. They lost like three games and just didn't score like it seemed like they should have with that dominant running game combined with a passing QB of Rustle's ability.

After seeing that list all I can think is lol Seneca Wallace lol Mike Holmgren

Their two regular season losses came on last second Hail Marys.

They averaged 46 points a game.

Really?

Not a running QB in the sense of 'has a huge number of rushes' but he runs in order to extend plays and escape pressure; he uses his running ability to aid his passing.

If any RW jock rider wants to come up with a wager that Rustle isn't a top-5 QB by EPA next year then let me know (he was 6th this year FWIW)

eta: just regular season ofc, he's too much of a beast in the playoffs

just lol @ Bridgewater not being any better than Tannehill

If iggy's not trolling, he's just making ignorant claims.

It's pretty well documented that Iggy possesses no ability to evaluate quarterbacks.

FWIW, I'm not saying Bridgewater's 50% to be better than Tannehill now. I'm just saying that he should on average be a kind of mid-1st round guy who's 50% to be a better prospect than Tannehill coming out of school. I could be wrong here, but it seems like Bridgewater's stock shot waaaaay up after the Sugar Bowl, and he wasn't necessarily that hyped before, and that his stock could easily end up slipping hard like Geno, Barkley, even Denard at one point.

He's a true sophomore running what I believe is a pro-style offense and had significant improvement from his freshman to his sophomore year (and then obviously the bowl game). Seems to be a significant dog to regress next season.

College rushing stats subtract sacks from rushing totals. So he prob ran for significantly more yardage.

I could be wrong

Edit: Added conferences.

Maybe lol-AFC after all. At least long term. Also interesting that all the "running QBs" are in the NFC.

Ice at Halftime:
18/24
271 Yds
3 TD
11.3 Avg
151.2 Rtg

I think I want to flip CK and Wilson on my list due to size/body

we def need a Baltimore/Atlanta SB so we can determine who the most best elite QB is between ICE & FLACKS

1 pick
1 fumble

CK7 is just absurd

what about 2nd half?

1. kaepernick







2-32. the rest

eat a dick, haters (see: run ricky run et al)

I'm not putting him ahead of SCAM, but he's clearly top 10 and pushing top 5

1. Chad Henne

1. Cam
2. Kaep
3. Rodgers
4. Luck