Quote:
Originally Posted by Needle77
I wonder why the debate shifted?...
Cause the legs of Goodie argument are extremely brittle and easy to destroy.
Stats
Consistancy
All heavily favor Peyton.
The ring arguments--teams play too much of a factor. And one can also argue Belicheck > Dungy. Belicheck seemed to always outsmart Dungy, Peyton and Moore.
The clutch argument. Just a cliche that the media loves.
The weapons argument. Peyton hasn't had great weapons the last 2 seasons and he's been MVP level for both. You can argue that Brady's have been better the last 3 seasons, 1 which he missed, and yet Peyton has been suprisingly effective.
What would it take for Peyton to be equal to Brady in the minds of Pats fans? I guess Peyton would have to win 4 SBs, then that small little argument would end, but I guess they would bring up something else.