Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NFL Offseason Thread NFL Offseason Thread

02-12-2013 , 02:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Le Gonso
It does get a little foggy making sense out of who to call the backup on a lot of teams. Guys-in-waiting that are drafted for the purpose of replacing a weaker starter make it harder to count. More talking in terms of the importance having QB depth than splitting hairs over which is the starter/backup, responding to Wheatrich. In Kaepernick's case, the 49ers also kept Smith around... Foles isn't Kaepernick but I see the Eagles situation as pretty similar.

For my part I don't think teams are aggressive enough in grabbing QBs once they have their guy. The Packers could take a QB high this year and I wouldn't blink if he's BPA. Good QBs so hard to come by I don't think it makes sense to shut down pursuing them with a good starter.
im not a niner fan so i obv don't follow it as closly but it *seems* to me that there's been a bit of revisionist history wrt kaep. it seemed more to me that they took him as a bit of a gamble with a lot of upside knowing that they had smith who was at least serviceable in running their offense. and then smith got hurt and kaep immediately started crushing everyone was like duh we always knew how awesome he was, he was gonna take smiths job any second now either way.

totally agree about not drafting enough QBs. but moreso with regard to teams that don't have one. i would have 0 qualms about the vikes taking a QB in each of the first 3 rounds. I think I'd actually prefer it.
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 02:42 AM
I don't pretend to know the 49ers current draft philosophy on QBs or how they felt about Alex Smith. Harbaugh took over after a year of them switching between between Smith and Troy Smith, and by the point (Alex) Smith had been in the league for a while with bad results. I'd speculate that they were looking for a replacement. But, they could just have the same perspective on it that I do and not think a high 2nd round pick is a big deal to spend acquiring another QB option.
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 02:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLSoldier
im not a niner fan so i obv don't follow it as closly but it *seems* to me that there's been a bit of revisionist history wrt kaep. it seemed more to me that they took him as a bit of a gamble with a lot of upside knowing that they had smith who was at least serviceable in running their offense. and then smith got hurt and kaep immediately started crushing everyone was like duh we always knew how awesome he was, he was gonna take smiths job any second now either way.

totally agree about not drafting enough QBs. but moreso with regard to teams that don't have one. i would have 0 qualms about the vikes taking a QB in each of the first 3 rounds. I think I'd actually prefer it.
i can see why you'd think so but it's not really revisionist. generally speaking you're not taking a QB at 36 so he can be your long-term backup, especially when your current QB situation is unstable (this was before smith's renaissance), and you're certainly not doing it for that reason trading 45, 108 and 141 to move up those 9 spots.

then they gave smith a 3 year deal last offseason at what was relatively below-market value, especially considering smith was only 27 at the time. and even before the concussion, kaepernick was getting a lot more reps than the backup of a super bowl contender should ever get during the regular season.

now i can't possibly imagine they expected kaepernick would be the starter this year, but i also can't possibly imagine harbaugh would have been so quick to leave smith on the bench if they weren't at least slightly ok with letting smith walk last offseason and kaepernick take over
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 02:53 AM
ah ya i forgot they drafted kaep b4 smith did OK last year. nevermind.
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 10:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke0424
really? moreso than andy reid and sean payton? both coaches historically have done better in optimal pass/run ratios, went for it more aggressively on 4th down, and have employed much much more dynamic offenses than BB.
how can u be this clueless?
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 11:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
how can u be this clueless?
idk brah, seems liek ther iz sum dta sayng otha stuff

http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/st...ficiency/2012/

reid sseeeeems alll ovar tha place tho, ovar his carer. his run/pas ratio is aggressive tho
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 11:57 AM
no there isnt data supporting that unless you cherry pick end points.
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 11:58 AM
Johnny Knox has his contract with the Bears terminated, probably done playing football for good
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 12:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
no there isnt data supporting that unless you cherry pick end points.
mebbbe other stats,? u got any, or just goin of yur gut?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geddy Lee
Johnny Knox has his contract with the Bears terminated, probably done playing football for good
That sucks. That hit was brutal. I wonder if he will even try and make another team.
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 12:09 PM
surely u can understand why total 4th down attempts is irrelevant
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 12:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
surely u can understand why total 4th down attempts is irrelevant
So,. no states at all? Im shoked.

Total attemps is not grate, but it's a start. But its kewl, you gots gut feels.
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 12:34 PM
do u have stats proving the opposite?

quite an impasse it seems we are at eh
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 12:37 PM
02-12-2013 , 12:42 PM
omg, well dun!
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 02:02 PM
**** john fox sucks
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 02:03 PM
I see CC is keeping up his flawless debate record
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 02:05 PM
holmgren being near the bottom seems surprising. packers never seemed to play that conservatively
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 02:07 PM
You have a feeling about how aggressive the Packers were 15 years ago?
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 02:09 PM
the person i would like everyone to note on that list is MIKE TOMLIN. I've said it before but ill say it again, he gets credit for being aggressive bc he's young and black, but he is actually the 2nd most conservative coach only ahead of the freaking walrus!
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 02:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SL__72
You have a feeling about how aggressive the Packers were 15 years ago?
gotta go with your gut
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 02:11 PM
never really thought of mike tomlin as aggressive. may be pics of him hanging with ray lewis at a nightclub i don't know about tho.
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 02:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Das Boot
I see CC is keeping up his flawless debate record
pretty sure if i made the audacious claim that water was wet or the sky was blue he would clamor for a link with some sort of proof. id lean troll quite heavily at this point just bc i dont like thinking ppl are that dumb.
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 02:12 PM
back when the steelers were a little fresher off their SBs tomlin would always get put on top 5 coaches lists and ppl would claim he was aggro
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 02:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLSoldier
the person i would like everyone to note on that list is MIKE TOMLIN. I've said it before but ill say it again, he gets credit for being aggressive bc he's young and black, but he is actually the 2nd most conservative coach only ahead of the freaking walrus!
He's also probably the worst at using challenges in the league. Yes, worse than Marvin Lewis.
NFL Offseason Thread Quote
02-12-2013 , 02:58 PM
Belichick seems overrated. The gap between him and Payton or the Harbaughs (John>Jim), Pete or even a Coughlin isn't as huge as people make it out to be.
NFL Offseason Thread Quote

      
m