Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NCAA Basketball 2010-11 Thread NCAA Basketball 2010-11 Thread

03-26-2011 , 12:54 AM
i've definitely been abrasive and obnoxious in this thread but i'm right. the zone is a total travesty and exploitable, and i'm sure i'll have to argue otherwise once again next year

lol marquette
03-26-2011 , 12:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyenimator
Marquette's zone =! Syracuse's vaunted 2-3 zone.
i forgot to include you, sorry =/
03-26-2011 , 01:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by C-Viggity
Know it won't matter when ****** homers argue against it against next year, but the zone is a joke. it's a joke against any talented team who shoots the 3 well or who doesn't, it's a joke versus any team with real talent.

it's a shame there's not really unc fans that get it other than tarheeljks and geoff, but i'm sure i'll have to battle once again with ******s like lurchy and jackets next year who think there's a formula to college success that isn't playing real basketball (nba)

unc has won titles playing nba basketball, hopefully unc fans finally begin to embrace it. everyone who is wrong tends to disappear til next year tho

big east is a joke, zone defense is a joke, thinking it's ok to play zone vs unc because they can't shoot is a joke

haters will hate
wat

I avoided the zone argument like the plague. I think I made one comment that you were being annoying in your 40 straight posts of anti-Syracuse /anti-zone talk.

Good rant though.
03-26-2011 , 01:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LurchySoprano
wat

I avoided the zone argument like the plague. I think I made one comment that you were being annoying in your 40 straight posts of anti-Syracuse /anti-zone talk.

Good rant though.
i mighta jus included you for hating

if you don't believe in the zone then i apologize
we stick together even if you don't like me
03-26-2011 , 01:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by charder30
This is true, but some people ITT are underrating the job. Its def a very good job, prob top 25.
idk, just off the top of my head, i can def see it being 20-25 range, but if you were going to "range" it i think you'd be a lot more honest saying 20-40 range than top 25.

i guess im not really sure... but it feels like they're in such a squeeze with the d1 programs around them. where do you think they rank in the ACC? are they definitely the 4-5th best job? is it possible it's the 6-7th best job?

i dont' know enough about the acc i guess, but i would have thought it was on par with the middle of most of the major conferences, and in contention with the very very top midmajor jobs (that's how i came up with top 50).

you know more about the acc tho i guess or maybe their resources. from the outside, it doesn't look good.
03-26-2011 , 01:20 AM
I much prefer man-to-man but I do think the zone has its positives. While I like Boeheim, I will never understand why he doesn't run any man to man from what I can tell. I remember them losing an exhibition game last year where they ran man all game and it was an epic fail. Overall, I much prefer man but do think the ability to throw zone in for a few minutes as a curveball can be a nice change of pace (see: Michigan vs. Duke).

It's all good with everything else.
03-26-2011 , 01:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LurchySoprano
I much prefer man-to-man but I do think the zone has its positives. While I like Boeheim, I will never understand why he doesn't run any man to man from what I can tell. I remember them losing an exhibition game last year where they ran man all game and it was an epic fail. Overall, I much prefer man but do think the ability to throw zone in for a few minutes as a curveball can be a nice change of pace (see: Michigan vs. Duke).

It's all good with everything else.
Agreed zone has it's place, I just never quite got why people thought zone as a UNC beater. Bad 3pt shooting doesn't really mean zone beats you, and Marq played a zone-ish defense tonight and UNC did a rly good job exploiting it. I think we're lucking out of the tOSU D tho. UK is a very different game
03-26-2011 , 01:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aejones
idk, just off the top of my head, i can def see it being 20-25 range, but if you were going to "range" it i think you'd be a lot more honest saying 20-40 range than top 25.

i guess im not really sure... but it feels like they're in such a squeeze with the d1 programs around them. where do you think they rank in the ACC? are they definitely the 4-5th best job? is it possible it's the 6-7th best job?

i dont' know enough about the acc i guess, but i would have thought it was on par with the middle of most of the major conferences, and in contention with the very very top midmajor jobs (that's how i came up with top 50).

you know more about the acc tho i guess or maybe their resources. from the outside, it doesn't look good.
It still prob the 4th best job in the ACC. Id put them in the 3rdish tier so ya maybe 20-35ish range off the top of my head...Id just did some very quick counting and Id say about 25thish
03-26-2011 , 01:27 AM
Sullinger says he's returning to OSU next year.
03-26-2011 , 01:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by waldo027
Sullinger says he's returning to OSU next year.
wow really ******ed if true
03-26-2011 , 01:36 AM
Eh, standard thing to say after the emotion of a loss. Would be ******ed if he does.
03-26-2011 , 01:37 AM
Please, the OSU boosters will make up for it
03-26-2011 , 01:50 AM
NC State should be a top 20 job. Still can't believe they ran Sendek out of town.
03-26-2011 , 01:54 AM
lol cvag gonna cvag

Once a team lost a game playing man to man defense, thus all man to man defense is bad strategy against decent teams
03-26-2011 , 02:15 AM
haters gonna hate
don't hear them much now tho

sure your argument will sound purrrrrrrrrrre next year again
03-26-2011 , 02:28 AM
kentucky,

please play a 2-3 zone like marquettelol did!
03-26-2011 , 02:29 AM
Nothing in sports is more of a non-story then the "Player X will return to school next year" after the conclusion of their season. It's got to be 50/50 at best if they change their mind.
03-26-2011 , 02:34 AM
agreed, sullinger statement rly odd and definitely not definitive
03-26-2011 , 05:29 AM
idk, he seems pretty sure of it

Quote:
"I'm going to be an Ohio State Buckeye next year," he said. "This isn't why I came here, to come in here and see my seniors in here crying. I came here to win a national championship."

Plenty of people make pledges in the rubble of an emotional loss only to change their mind later, when the sting and suddenness of the season fades and the promise of the NBA looms.

Sullinger, who had 21 points and 16 rebounds in his final game of the season, insists that won't happen.

"I'm a man of my word," Sullinger said. "I don't change my word and no one changes it for me. This is what I want."

Sullinger said he made the decision following the game, but coach Thad Matta said it's the message Sullinger has been sending to him all season.

"Oh he's been telling me that all along," Matta said. "And I believe it. He told me, draw me up a contract, whatever you need to do. I believe him when he says it."

Last edited by GeoffRas22; 03-26-2011 at 05:29 AM. Reason: http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=6260339
03-26-2011 , 11:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffRas22
idk, he seems pretty sure of it
There was a twitter post from his brother about buying season tickets for next years games.

I buy it. He's seen a ton of big men before him from Ohio State go to the NBA and be complete duds. He still needs to improve his game to be a real presence in the NBA. He either does it riding the pine for an NBA team, or he plays 35 minutes a night for Ohio State next year. While he'd be giving up millions in one sense, it might be a better long-term choice to be better prepared and come out in better form. He's not giving up as much as people might think. He does have the risk of injury (but he has that in the NBA also), and insurance policies can cover a lot of that risk. His family is not desperate for money, so he can wait a year. I don't think he can make a decision that is that wrong. There are benefits and drawbacks of both.

Anyone who watched last night's game shows he still needs a bit of polish.
03-26-2011 , 11:31 AM
as a uconn fan...idk why every team in the country doesnt zone us
03-26-2011 , 11:38 AM
Big 10 is out and BE has 1 team left but the SEC has 2 teams............who would have thunk. Obviously my SEC homer friend who picked UK and UF in the F4.
03-26-2011 , 12:05 PM
sad the Ohio State thread got locked.

I was about to pile on the Tressel smacking pointing out their basketball team has been less than clean over the years. Randy Ayers was involved in some big stuff in early 90s. Jim O'Brien was brought in to "clean up the program." LOL. That ended with big funds going to players, vacated final four, and more NCAA issues.

Look at Tressel's track record:
"Over the course of his career, Tressel has had players who drew the NCAA’s attention.

While Tressel was coach at Youngstown State, of Division I’s Football Championship Subdivision, quarterback Ray Isaac was accused of accepting improper benefits including cars from boosters. Years later, the university admitted to the infractions and faced minor penalties.

The player who led Ohio State to its first national championship in 34 years, tailback Maurice Clarett, also involved Tressel in some NCAA problems. After the Buckeyes beat Miami in the BCS National Championship Game following the 2002 season, Clarett was suspended for receiving improper benefits from Buckeyes boosters.

Clarett, who never played another collegiate game, also accused the university of academic fraud in its dealings with athletes’ academics.

Troy Smith, Tressel’s quarterback who won the Heisman Trophy in 2006, was suspended for the Alamo Bowl at the end of the 2004 season and for the first two games of the 2005 season for taking money from a booster.

In May of 2009, The Columbus Dispatch reported that since 2000, Ohio State had reported to the NCAA more than 375 violations — the most of any of the 69 Football Bowl Subdivision schools that provided documents to the newspaper through public-records requests. Most of the infractions were minor and resulted in little or no punishment."
source: Adam Rittenber's Big Ten blog on ESPN

Remember Robert Smith having to quit the football team since the coaches wouldn't let him take real classes.

Let's not kid ourselves: Ohio State is fast on the heels of what is being done at Kentucky.
03-26-2011 , 12:23 PM
No one pays Illinois players. But that's because none are worth it
03-26-2011 , 01:51 PM
A Louisville fan is seriously arguing with EVERYONE on Facebook right now that UNC is a much, much better team than tOSU and that they will blow UK out by 12.

      
m