Quote:
Originally Posted by bigt2k4
Meant to comment on this yesterday. I'm not sure it's the best way to sort by the stat, but it's much better than average ages of the team. Denver and Boston are the only winning teams in the top 5, but that number is a bit misleading because you're getting a good portion of minutes of your "top player" minutes from guys like Horford and Kyrie on the Celtics who are 31 and 25 respectively. On Portland, who ranks 9th on that list, you're getting most of your production from Dame and CJ who are 27 and 26 respectively.
Denver's two best players rn are Jokic and Harris, who are 22 and 23, which is a big difference than having two really good players that are 25+ and then a bunch of 19 year old role-players around them.
The Nuggs have surpassed every promising "young" team out there with the exception of
maybe Philly, and I think those two are very close. If it weren't about chips only then I'd even take Denver, but you can't argue against Embiid's potential GOAT equity and what will happen if Fultz/Simmons play to the level where they were drafted.
With that said, Denver being on pace to win 47 games with their "best" players being the youngest bodes well for their future imo.
Jamal and Trey having seasons that blow expectations out of the water really changes their projections.