Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NBA Season Thread 2013-14 NBA Season Thread 2013-14

01-04-2014 , 12:32 AM
Perk -400, Westbrook --1200, both guys really cool. Perk shockingly nice
01-04-2014 , 12:32 AM
lol DEN not fouling ZBo when he catches in 2 territory.
01-04-2014 , 12:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediocrePlayer2.0
Basketball on paper is a good book
Cool, thanks. I'll have to check it out.
01-04-2014 , 12:35 AM
Fournier looks like Ernie from Billy Madison.
01-04-2014 , 12:36 AM
Now we get to learn how good Blake Griffin really is
01-04-2014 , 12:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by westhoff
I do think Kendall Marshall could be a solid back up point guard in the NBA. I know he pretty much sucked in phx, but he only played half a season with a **** coach on a team that was obviously tanking. Give the guy a chance to develop at least. Remember how terrible Dragic was his first year?
If he's actually learned how to shoot he has a chance.
01-04-2014 , 12:40 AM
ya kbutter is giving it to traids burke.

utah is the worst defense itl tho
01-04-2014 , 12:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidcolin
Fournier looks like Ernie from Billy Madison.
shampoo is better!
01-04-2014 , 12:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anatta
is it me or does jeff green suck wtf
You've been blowing him for a year and half. Where did this come from?
01-04-2014 , 12:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediocrePlayer2.0
Basketball on paper is a good book
This.
01-04-2014 , 12:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by westhoff
shampoo is better!
no conditioner is better!
01-04-2014 , 01:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeoTrollstoy
Shaq readily admits hakeem was better than him. Olajuwons blocking was 2nd to none and he had infinite post moves. Nice try though. Duncans supporting cast ****s all over hakeems and pop>>>>Rudy t.
i think hakeem > duncan but some of duncan's casts are pretty overrated imo. people look back at the 2003 team and see manu/parker but they weren't good yet. old drob was their 2nd best player and he played like 25 mpg

edit: and yeah bball on paper is a good book. must read for anyone interested in "advanced" stats imo
01-04-2014 , 01:04 AM
Duncan>Hakeem
01-04-2014 , 01:07 AM
lowry > lolwall
01-04-2014 , 01:07 AM
shaq > all
01-04-2014 , 01:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theblindside
JR SMIFFF
only Fredo Dolan could give this guy $9 million or whatever it is a year not realizing that he (a) needed surgery and (b) is ******ed (didn't the tattoos of the wingdings font all over his body give it away)?
01-04-2014 , 01:16 AM
damn equating tatts with low intelligence, some racism-ass mods up in here
01-04-2014 , 01:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aytumious
The Raps are 10-3 post-Gay.
DA RAPS

Massive win over other mid tier Eastern conference rivals.

Dat 3 seed.
01-04-2014 , 01:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fanerio
damn equating tatts with low intelligence, some racism-ass mods up in here
wingdings font though
01-04-2014 , 01:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Das Boot
Dean: good post. I agree that +5 to +6 seems reasonable for Dame offensively, and 3 points seems like a reasonable estimation for the defensive gap. I don't think it's overly pessimistic to project MCW as a +2 to +3 player offensively (or somewhere thereabouts), which is still a very very good offensive PG.

So then it's fit, where I think Lillard has (thus far) crushed in Portland, and I think they'd be worse off without his passing and shooting. (I think the passing merits elaboration: MCW has a sizable assist lead, but Lillard averages the same # of passes/game with fewer possessions and dramatically fewer turnovers.) Lillard spaces, he moves the ball well and unselfishly, and he moves well off the ball in a very fluid offensive system.

I think the beginning of the season allows you to justify some pretty large estimates of the gap between that offense going forward with Lillard and that offense going forward with MCW. Basically, to some extent, I'm betting on smart passing/spacing/shooting carrying some multiplier effect. (Would be curious to hear any Portland fans' thoughts about this assessment.)

(The second paragraph is referencing the second paragraph of my post, which I edited in and you may or may not have seen, judging from your post.)
so i just watched some dame highlights on youtube and i see what you're saying. this is a good post. it does make sense that analytics + elite shooting + elite passing would have great synergy and it helps explain why portland is so much better than expected.

also it makes sense to give dame a lot of credit for playing a key role in elevating portland in just his 2nd year.

i buy that he has equity to become an offensive superstud, he's only 23. +5-6 understates his upside, it extends above that. 4. DAME

edit- how mad would ppl get at 3. Dame w/ Rustle hurt?

Last edited by TheDean1; 01-04-2014 at 01:46 AM.
01-04-2014 , 01:38 AM
smh

Last edited by THAY3R; 01-04-2014 at 01:38 AM. Reason: @niss
01-04-2014 , 01:47 AM
zomg- as luck would have it McWim plays Dame tomorrow night

o/u currently 224.5
01-04-2014 , 01:47 AM
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/10...roposal-mulled

Melo/Chandler/Shump for Blake/DAJ/insert whatever scrub?
01-04-2014 , 01:49 AM
idk brewsard has been spouting a melo/blake swap for weeks now, i wouldnt be surprised if that "source" was entirely made up.
01-04-2014 , 01:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scherer716
idk brewsard has been spouting a melo/blake swap for weeks now, i wouldnt be surprised if that "source" was entirely made up.
the source is probably real, as Chris Broussard himself is not an imaginary person


      
m