Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NBA Season Thread 2010-2011 NBA Season Thread 2010-2011

11-27-2010 , 02:21 AM
Short hair looks hot on some women imo.
11-27-2010 , 02:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-inMcLovin
Chicks with short short hair is fail fail fail.

And I have no idea what Geoff is referring to with that pic.

If it's a pic of yourself then I recommend not to bite your lip so hard, could cause chapping.
Only chick to pull off a dixie cut was Natalie Portman. Portman was still a strong 3 even w/ no hair, it was truly amazing.

11-27-2010 , 02:27 AM
Natalie's dark brown eyes are very strong and give off a good presence even with short hair.

I approve.

She was ridic. adorable in Garden State amiright!?
11-27-2010 , 02:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-inMcLovin

And I have no idea what Geoff is referring to with that pic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-inMcLovin

Come up with variation/s of it maybe?
instead of saying "show your work" i googled "show your work" and used 1 of the image results
11-27-2010 , 02:29 AM
11-27-2010 , 02:31 AM
11-27-2010 , 02:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffRas22
instead of saying "show your work" i googled "show your work" and used 1 of the image results
and you chose the most horrible image.

wtg sir

& ty for explaining


^^^^ She looks very fetching there, would look Even better with long hair imho.

Only reason she cut it all off is because she wasn't allowed to cut her hair for all those years due to her contract with Harry Potter. Sort of a rebellion, taking back her hair, impulsive kind of maneuver.

Kristin Kreuk cut off a lot of her hair when she was done acting on Smallville in a similar decision.

Last edited by All-inMcLovin; 11-27-2010 at 02:38 AM. Reason: I'd like to ruffle her feathers!
11-27-2010 , 02:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffRas22
instead of saying "show your work" i googled "show your work" and used 1 of the image results
This is the top google result:
11-27-2010 , 02:40 AM
Yea I think everyone would have got that one. Why you chose some dude biting his lip, we'll never know.
11-27-2010 , 02:41 AM
I get that there are issues with stuff like framing her face and what not, but it's just hair. Whatever.
11-27-2010 , 02:44 AM
I'm drinking French Vanilla tea. I really highly recommend it, it's quite nice. Sugar and milk, very British of me. I'm feeling in a tea mood because of Harry Potter.

On that note, does anyone else find it hysterical when a black woman has a British accent? I've been watching this show - World Of Jenks - (I recommend it, it's been good except for the episode about poker, obviously) and there was an episode w/ "VV Brown". She's a singer, from England, black obv. I lolled the entire way.
11-27-2010 , 02:46 AM
bobbo youre a weird dude.
11-27-2010 , 02:48 AM
If by hysterical you mean saucily hot, then yes.

Bobbo being a weird dude is rather obvious.

Victor if the cavs beat the heat on thurs. will you change your avatar?
11-27-2010 , 02:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
bobbo youre a weird dude.
How so? Because I'm drinking tea while I watch a movie with mainly English accents? Because I'm watching a movie at 1:45 am on a weekend? Because I find Hermione Granger to be unbelievably hot?

Eh, I'm not buying it, Vic.
11-27-2010 , 02:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-inMcLovin
If by hysterical you mean saucily hot, then yes.
Nah dude the NFL Cheerleader was muuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuch hotter. Loved her. VV Brown was way too tall and skinny.
11-27-2010 , 02:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobboFitos
How so? Because I'm drinking tea while I watch a movie with mainly English accents? Because I'm watching a movie at 1:45 am on a weekend? Because I find Hermione Granger to be unbelievably hot?

Eh, I'm not buying it, Vic.
the black women with british accent thing i thought was weird.
11-27-2010 , 02:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-inMcLovin
If by hysterical you mean saucily hot, then yes.

Bobbo being a weird dude is rather obvious.

Victor if the cavs beat the heat on thurs. will you change your avatar?
nah dude. i like lebron and i like this avatar.
11-27-2010 , 02:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
nah dude. i like lebron and i like this avatar.
That's cool too.

Every time you post it's like Lebron is smiling at me.
11-27-2010 , 03:09 AM
i really like the bledsoe-gordon-amuni-griffin-jordan lineup for the clips. bledsoe seems way better than i thought and gordon/griffin are beasts, aminu looks promising and jordan is just huge

of course they'll prob give davis and kaman like 35mpg when they come back
11-27-2010 , 03:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-inMcLovin
That's cool too.

Every time you post it's like Lebron is smiling at me.
id like to think he is bra
11-27-2010 , 03:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjw0586
Melo, Monta, Kobe, Dirk
dirk is super efficient. he's hated for totally different reasons than sort by ppg.

kobe sucks.
11-27-2010 , 03:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NameOnTheCake
He's been playing incredible ball lately. I am a pretty big C's hater but I just can't hate on shak.
he really is ballin' outta control.
11-27-2010 , 03:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sethypooh
Look, I'm not defending Monta's horrific season last year beyond saying someone had to shoot for that team.
missed this discussion but even if curry was turning it over more the offense was better when he was the one w/ball (and simply when he was on the court). i don't doubt that a larger % of curry's possessions ended in turnovers-- turnovers happens when you pass the ball -- but i think the the stats and eye-test support the notion that the offense was much better when he was in the game and dictating what happened on offense

curry is a skilled offensive player, and i was on board w/the "someone has to shoot" defense for monta until about halfway through the year when it became undeniable that curry was a capable playmaker not just a spotup shooter. so yeah, someone had to shoot, curry is not as capable a creator as monta so it's fine if he takes more shots, but no one really needed to shoot the way monta shot. curry's presence meant that there was no need for monta to take a 20 footer simply for the sake of making sure a shot went up (to simplify the matter). if he's pushing the ball every time and getting high % shots ok, but lazy pullups don't help the cause and weren't necessary a lot of the time


edit: and he was playing very heavy minutes and being overworked, which was all the more reason to shoot less


2: that said monta agree that he got too much hate around here

Last edited by tarheeljks; 11-27-2010 at 03:21 AM.
11-27-2010 , 03:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
the black women with british accent thing i thought was weird.
yeah, i think it's weird too.

does anyone else think the playoffs, a mere ~16 games into the season, are already almost set? I do with the exception of the bottom 3 east. the top teams right now:


bos
orl
chi
mia
atl
nyk
ind
cle

sas
lal
noh
uta
dal
okc
dal
por

the outside looking in for the east is tor, det, cha, was, njn, mil, phi. Hollinger's playoff odds actually rate milwaukee, despite the low win-loss, as a strong favorite to make it. nyk, despite the win streak, sits at a not so great shot.

for the west, phx, mem, hou, and gsw are the fringe teams. hollinger gives these team as a very outside shot already, despite being close in wins and losses.

personally, i think the west is set. phx mem hou and gsw are NOT making the playoffs. i have no trouble saying the best teams in the west - nay, the best teams in the league (sas, lal, uta) are going to win their divisions. noh/dal make up a strong 2nd tier, and will be a good 4/5 matchup. den, okc, por will be 1st round fodder, ldo. you can quote me on thsi later.

in the east, well, what a story it would be if toronto made the playoffs. imo not happening, obviously, but indiana looks like a true playoff team. so who is the last fringe team?? charlotte, i guess, maybe new york. i dont know they're all awful
11-27-2010 , 03:18 AM
sadly cavs arent gonna playoff. have had a disgustingly easy schedule but are still well below .500 with an atrocious pd.

      
m