Quote:
Originally Posted by SarcasticRat
I mostly just think the singing + iconic frontman aspect is way harder to replace than the instrumentalists and even the songwriting. I could be way off though.
I think that's pretty reasonable generally. I never saw the Ramones live, so maybe I'm very off the ball here, but... But in the case of the Ramones I think the thing that is iconic is their collective identify at "The Ramones" - "Three chord wonders", "pinhead rockers", ... The lyrics usually (intentionally) weren't personalized either emotionally or, eg, like Strummer, politically. One gets generic satires on teenage angst at most.
That's a positive artistically: it's (in part) pointing out the boringness of the whole sub-Romantic aesthetic of post Dylan/Sgt Pepper pop songs, and parodying pre Sgt-Pepper Tin Pan Alley/Beatles/Beach Boys simultaneously.
The weakness of the premise of this draft (and we're seeing this over and over) is that it takes the sensitive poet/guitarist-creator or emotional channeller/entertainer-troubadour as the nec plus ultra of music.
For me The Ramones were hugely important for always standing against that. (And, btw, i'm a huge sucker for that sub-Romo ****, so it's a great wake-me-up against it.) That's why I'm hoping that your next 3 picks are determined by that one.
(No not really. And when are you going to take the Sarcastic Rat?)