Quote:
Originally Posted by clowntable
Yes but...
...very few people outside the US even understand the rules of football/have heard about it/watch it whereas soccer is wide spread.
That's irrelevant. We're talking about the most absurd call, not the one with the most exposure.
Quote:
I'd also say that some soccer world cup deciding goal (this happened in an important match) has more impact than a regular season college game.
Not when it happened 7 minutes into the game vs the end of the game, and the fact that it's the World Cup vs regular season doesn't have any effect on the "outcome changing" part of it.
Quote:
Note: I'm a Sooners fan and don't care about Argentina.
Note2: OU-Ducks was certainly more absurd though, not debating that.
Good, we agree.
Quote:
But saying the first goal wasn't game changing is a bit silly. You know how much changes for your team when you're suddenly behind 0-1 with less than a half to go in a must win game. The psychological blow also must have been nontrivial since a bunch of players saw it clearly wasn't a goal and after a couple of minutes I'm sure all of them new.
With the OU/Oregon call, you know the game changed, instantly and permanently. With the Argentina call, you don't know how much it changed the game. They scored another (great) goal, but England also was able to score, so it wasn't devestating. We'll never know who would've won that game if that call was made correctly. We know who would've won the OU/OU game if the call was made correctly.
Quote:
It's just the stuff that happens and sometimes goes your way and sometimes doesn't just like close offside calls etc.
You make it sound like it was common, when it hasn't ever happened before and won't happen again most likely. They missed the line call AND they missed the recovery call AND they reviewed it.