Quote:
Originally Posted by kidcolin
except not Bingo, and the numbers reflect Duncan's greatness and the gigantic flaws in Randolph's game. It was a terrible point.
Looking strictly at the basic numbers there is no way anyone would think Duncan is as great as he is, as plenty of PF's/C's have put up similar/better numbers throughout the NBA.
Randolph being an all-star was kinda a stretch but the numbers obv make him look a lot better than he is, so how about saying looking at the numbers only Michael Redd would be a superstar. Is that better?