Quote:
Originally Posted by I Hate the Spurs
Kiki was a good pick - but you cant be serious when you compare him to Mullin or Cummings...everythiung Kiki did, Mullin did better...and everything Kiki did, Cummings did better plus more. I can see you trying to compare Kiki with Mullin maybe (becuase their styles were somewhat similar, but you know youre talking about one of NBAs Top 50 Players of All Time, right?) - and Cummings....he was a defensive beast, a rebouding monster and was so damn versatile on the offensive end its not even funny. Youre comparing apples and oranges my friend...rather grapes and watermelons.
Cummings had post moves galore...and to top it off could step outside for the Jay....slash or settle for a mid range. He was a mismatch waiting to happen.
kiki was a good value pick - but please...no vulgar language.
What planet are you on? Did you really just compare Cummings offensive ability to Kiki's and not only put them in the same league but claim him to be better?
Cummings has a career TS% of .520 and a career high of .557. Kiki's career TS% is .594 and he only had two seasons ever (one of which being his rookie year and the other being a 22 game injury plagued season late in his career) that were below Cummings average.
Cummings has a career EFG% of .485, Kiki's is .534.
Kiki had more offensive win shares in a 5 year span than Cummings had in his entire 18 year career.
Cummings career high ORtg is 113, Kiki's career average is 119 with 7 seasons over 120.
Kiki is an offensive beast.
Mullin is probably close offensively, and has a slight (although not as much as you'd make it out to be, since he wasn't much of a defender either) edge on defense.