Quote:
Originally Posted by DannyOcean_
Some good discussion going on recently.
I got Conor as the #2 MMA draw of all time behind Lesnar. Might have to revise that depending on what the PPV numbers for this event end up being.
RE: a lot of the talking points in the last 100 posts - the money makers get to do what they want. Conor has spent two fight camps in a row prepping for Aldo and I doubt he wants to do it a third time in a row. Most dominant champs get an immediate rematch, but Conor is a huge draw and the UFC caters to the money makers. If Conor doesn't want to fight Aldo yet he won't. It's not because Dana is evil - this has been going on literally as long as the sport has existed, from UFC 1 (and probably even before if you look at shooto/pancrase stuff).
The UFC is actually BETTER about this than boxing, at least they force their champs to fight on a regular schedule against good opponents. If you are a boxing PPV draw, you can literally handpick every single opponent you fight. The UFC might let Conor fight someone else first, but they'll almost certainly make him rematch Aldo within a year or two.
You have been a fan longer than I have and have a deeper understanding of the history of the sport than I do. I don't remember things being this way before though. It marks a change as I see it. Sure the money was always important. Lesnar got the same cristisism as Conor for a fast rise because he was a draw, maybe more.
But when has A champ been denied a rematch? Hell, if anything I think the ufc has been rematch and trilogy happy lots of times, especially with fighters who are past their prime. I just don't recall it being new champs choice ever. The draws get preference, I get that and get why. Can you give me some examples of anything close to Aldo being denied a rematch though? Even remotely close?
Thanks.