Quote:
Originally Posted by MicroBob
Sylar, your response to me seems like you think I was advocating some strong position for the players or owners or something or that I said something worth getting upset about. I didn't call anyone out or anything. I'm explaining how it works and giving what little knowledge I have on the matter. You mentioning that I called someone out is dumb.
Stop being so touchy. Not everyone is against you.
you work in minor league hockey. you opinion on hosting AHL games at NHL rinks is positive, even though i think you are disappointed that Buffalo didn't sell out. but this is positive that (for the lack of a better work)
benevolent nhl team lets ahl team into its rink [ETA: didn't mean to make it a quote]. i have no problem with it.
there are other labor issues here, but whatever.
but as soon as it's a ZOMG foreign league, with locked out players who are actively speaking out against a league, the tone shifts to "of course they shouldn't be allowed to do this. the delusion!".
Quote:
Regardless, barclays just recently signed as an nhl arena. They haven't officially started yet, but the NHL game was cancelled shortly after that. Very possible there was relation and it isn't up to your own personal definition of what should technically be okay. It could be kind of about the league and one of their new partners at barclays ....albeit technically a future partner although it is possible that by signing to commit to an nhl team they are already a partner NOW ....and how they are going about things. Maybe not. No biggie.
it does appear that you have little knowledge of why the khl cancelled the barclays games. once again, you are ignoring the backlash back home against the games. by far a greater force on khl's decisions than the rhetorical legal ability to have those games at a future nhl-arena, according to a prior agreement between the khl and prokhorov. that's why i called your point, which you are pulling out of thin air, tin-foily.
Quote:
It is entirely possible that the lease for nhl arenas includes language about not allowing alternative leagues in their buildings without league approval. And signing a lease for 2015 and then allowing a bunch of locked out stars to jump in there and make you a profit thus usurping the league in its own way certainly could be viewed as running quite contrary to that.
it's possible, but i seriously doubt that the khl and barclays didn't have a contract or a verbal agreement to play, before the nhl jumped in with this islanders lease.