Okay, now this one gets more interesting with the Pecos League.
From this article about the league from last year, it appeared that they were looking at the idea of not paying SOME of their players.
Quote:
“According to the Las Cruces Sun-News, last year Vaqueros had a team salary of roughly $20,000. Players were being paid a minimum of $200 a month with a cap of $400. Dunn was reportedly quoted as saying that in 2011 teams will entertain a $35,000 cap with players now making between $200 and $500 a month.
Here’s the kicker; ten of the 30 on the roster will not be paid.
Talk about love of the game!”
I mean, some of the guys who are getting paid are getting $50/week to play a full schedule. It's pretty much room-and-board provided and maybe some meal money to live but it's so small that calling it "pro" is iffy already although I do feel it qualifies. Getting paid is getting paid....even if it's $200/mth.
But what about the guys who don't get paid at all...on a pro team?
If they are doing that then that would certainly be the kind of position that amazin would be attempting to land. So are free players still pro just by playing in a pro game even if they don't get paid? It's complicated.
But overall, this Pecos League is a glorious opportunity for a much lower level caliber of player to make it to a "pro" league. Whether it remains an option or not is questionable because the league could be on the verge of going under. Maybe not though. Hard to lose too much money when you aren't even paying a lot of your players.
Last edited by MicroBob; 07-02-2012 at 12:18 AM.