Pretty hilarious, but that ref is pretty cowardly for not throwing him out of the game after he touched him/got in his face giving him the photo.

https://twitter.com/benbbaldwin/stat...470730752?s=19

.

DOUGIE P

sure, objective vs. subjective, why not?

I don't want instant replay to take the time to go frame by frame to see if the ball in a diving catch actually touched the ground for a millisecond or moved a little as the player rolls over. I hate that. If it looks like a catch in regular speed, it's a catch.

What I like replay for is to stop travesties like this:



....I do not like the idea of replay being used to retroactively assess a penalty. That's stupid. If the refs miss a penalty, oh well.

But I don't really have an opinion of the other possibilities....but it's just my opinion...I don't have any proof of anything lol

Fat Mike is 5th overall.

Rams probably most interesting given the coach is supposed to be a vaunted offensive guy and he's instead one of the top 3 most conservative coaches in the league.

Also LOL where the 9ers are on that list when he did 2018 only, you can change the coach but it's hard to cut out cancer like kick the FG down 4.

Well one of those years was a Jeff Fisher year...but still, he can't bring it down that far.

And here it is for people who don't want to click links:

2018 only. Rams still lol.


Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk

???
What is the x axis supposed to be?

rank 1-32

I see good teams, bad teams, and nondescript teams in both corners so maybe we overrate going for fourth down correctly.

nah

It doesn't mean it's not a big deal, just that maybe there's a lot of other things that happen in a football game that can change the outcome. Like FAT MIKE

https://www.scribd.com/document/4142...HE-IS-A-VICTIM

Not sure how accurate this is but it looks like Tyreek Hill might have been set up.

Where I get all my reliable, unbiased news.

You can't copy/paste direct from there without signing up which I cbf doing but basically one page in they literally say to FOLLOW THE MONEY because the Vegas line for Chiefs Superbowl champs didn't move when Hill news came out.

Then later says Espinal is 'basically a bat-****-crazy-chick' due to previous instances of self-harm, but earlier says we shouldn't judge Hill in this case based on his past.

There is a crazy amount of assumptions and guessing with very little evidence given.

Cliffs: what nath said.

Yeah that's just someone's blog basically. None of the Chiefs heavy-hitter insiders like Sam Mellinger or Terez Paylor have said anything either way. Child services is still investigating and the NFL is too presumably.

Chiefsplanet has been all over the stuff in that article for weeks. Shocker but it's mostly the huge Trumpfans who are screaming at anyone who even tries to inject some realism into the Hill situation - calling them SJWs. The politics forum there has always been toxic, but the main forum is becoming just as bad.

It does look fairly unlikely he broke the kid's arm (and very likely it was just an accident). But I wouldn't be surprised if he still gets 4 games for the tape and whatever the NFL uncovers. Assuming nothing major and new comes out.

Even if he’s completely cleared by the cops and child services, he’s definitely gonna get more than 4 games from the NFL

I’d probably be making the market at 7.5

Hey Suzzer...what kind of odds will you give me if I want to bet you that the Bills win a SB before the Chiefs?

Dude we're already staring down death in a few decades - let's not depress ourselves even further.

Yea, you two bet that, and I'll escrow

LOL

Bengals #11 pick out for the season

What if I told you that you could win almost 1/2 a game more a year just by being smarter about 4th down?

And if you ever got questioned you could pull out statistical evidence showing why you did it.

Amazing that this is still an issue.