Trust me I would love to quit playing NL, but when there's 1 table of PL100 and 8 tables of NL100 running, unfortunately you have to go where the action is. And of course the natural followup to that statement is, "well if you're losing at it why play it?". My answer to that is I see a game I can't beat as a weakness and something that I need to fix.
After looking over my stats and comparing to a few of the decent winners in my DB I do think I'm being too aggressive, especially on the flop. Building a big pot when it's usually still pretty much a coinflip in equity then facing a shove when you don't improve much is not a fun place to be. Normally when I hit I stack someone but when I'm bleeding 8-10bbs per hand that I don't connect decently with (and 100bbs when my hero calls go pearshaped) it's a losing proposition.
Kuso -
1) Higher AF at 200s is a result of taking a shot outside of my normal limits. I'm naturally aggressive as hell (if you want to see fps/******ed aggro monkey I'll post my NLHE stats) and I think I need to tone it back to what the game dictates.
2) Noted, I have a few ideas I'll be working with.
3) Easy to trap / bully since my default line is bet and my range isn't nearly LAG enough for my AF? Makes sense if that's what you meant, that's kinda the conclusion I've arrived at looking over my stuff.
4) Biggest pots lost were set over sets, underboats, suckouts, combo airballs, and of course a handful of idiot semibluffs/calls on my part. Looking back I would have played about half of them the same way. PokerEV always has good things to say about my equity, I just get crushed in the non-SDs.
Thanks for the replies everyone.