04-11-2015 , 03:10 PM
Ya everyone has been having issues with stars the last few days. Email them to request refunds.
04-15-2015 , 10:57 AM
Found out I will, as usual, be on the second lowest level of play, that's the tree fiddies. Probably that's partly because I don't like to exploit fish, mostly just trying out maths.

Glad at least Angribob is company. You get to learn from the masters.
04-19-2015 , 08:03 AM
I'm back!

With some help from the "fish"
04-19-2015 , 11:00 AM
bless...
04-21-2015 , 03:13 AM
Is anyone 3betting 2222 to aaaa pre flop
04-21-2015 , 04:57 AM
AAAA of course, it's the nut blocker hand
04-21-2015 , 03:38 PM
yeah got quads in the hole!!!
04-22-2015 , 03:19 AM
I've been through the last few pages and can't find anywhere if cEV is correct in HU hypers in HEM2. I am an ungodly amount under ev, and I assume that it can't be correct.
04-22-2015 , 03:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoMarginal
I've been through the last few pages and can't find anywhere if cEV is correct in HU hypers in HEM2. I am an ungodly amount under ev, and I assume that it can't be correct.
04-22-2015 , 10:00 AM
Poker Stars \$3.32+\$0.18 No Limit Omaha Hi/Lo Tournament - t15/t30 Blinds + t3 - 5 players
DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

UTG: t516 M = 8.60
CO: t934 M = 15.57
BTN: t457 M = 7.62
Hero (SB): t993 M = 16.55
BB: t100 M = 1.67

Pre Flop: (t60) Hero is SB with A A 3 2
2 folds, BTN raises to t454 all in, Hero raises to t990 all in, BB calls t67 all in

Flop: (t1020) 9 7 5 (3 players - 3 are all in)
Turn: (t1020) 3 (3 players - 3 are all in)
River: (t1020) T (3 players - 3 are all in)
Spoiler:
Final Pot: t1020
BTN shows 8s 3d 4h Ac (HI: a pair of Threes; LO: 7,5,4,3,A)
Hero shows As Ad 3s 2h (HI: a pair of Aces; LO: 7,5,3,2,A)
BB shows 4d 2d Td Th (HI: three of a kind, Tens; LO: 7,5,4,3,2)
Hero wins t357
Hero wins t357
BB wins t153
Hero wins t153
Enjoyed this so much, would have wished for the fairytale to continue. But busted in 3rd place
The consolation: C Net Adjusted was \$2.15
04-22-2015 , 12:39 PM
its not correct on hm2 guys, use pokertracker, pretty sure its not perfect but its better then hm2
04-23-2015 , 11:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnnaturalDisaster
Ya everyone has been having issues with stars the last few days. Email them to request refunds.
Yes, I got refunded for 2 sit n gos and 2 spin and gos and some limit games where I was SB and BB. Very happy.
04-30-2015 , 01:03 PM

04-30-2015 , 08:31 PM
Is it me or has the volume dropped significantly?
05-01-2015 , 04:58 PM
yeah it has, no one plays no more ive only got like 800 games haha
05-01-2015 , 05:37 PM
Sure. Only 20 3.5+ tables running atm. nlo8 hypers are dead.
05-01-2015 , 06:01 PM
I have played 2100 hypers in the last 6 days
05-01-2015 , 06:12 PM
yeah but all low stakes, \$30+ never get going, not that i play them like
05-01-2015 , 06:29 PM
I played 5 60s in the last hour and Hunnmatt was not even grinding. Its just a matter of which regs are playing. If myself Hunnmatt and Bullstopper are all playing 30s run pretty regularly. Its not all bad having the games less popular among regs either. Hypers are softer than ever atm although I would obv prefer more regs willing to play the higher stakes.
05-02-2015 , 08:38 AM
yeah but can u win vs 5 other winning regs? or does rake just win?

you say game are easier the ever but i disagree, when i first started playing there were no regs at lower stakes so it was free money, the higher stakes will be softer (when they get going) as there are less winning regs.

sometimes there will be you, biood, angribob etc playing the \$1.5 and £3.50 stakes. harder for the lower stakes grinders to move up when our roi goes from 10% to about 3% becasue games are harder. not that i really care because the nature of the game nobody has that much of an edge, and volume is the only real way to win.

i mean how much are you making from rakeback? it it even worth playing \$100+ stakes at the risk of a downswing?
05-02-2015 , 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexmck123
yeah but can u win vs 5 other winning regs? or does rake just win?

you say game are easier the ever but i disagree, when i first started playing there were no regs at lower stakes so it was free money, the higher stakes will be softer (when they get going) as there are less winning regs.

sometimes there will be you, biood, angribob etc playing the \$1.5 and £3.50 stakes. harder for the lower stakes grinders to move up when our roi goes from 10% to about 3% becasue games are harder. not that i really care because the nature of the game nobody has that much of an edge, and volume is the only real way to win.

i mean how much are you making from rakeback? it it even worth playing \$100+ stakes at the risk of a downswing?
There is not even 5 other good regs that play these anymore.

I have always played 3.50s as did Biood who does not even play hypers anymore. I play 1.50s now as well because I play 16-20 tables because the games are soft enough that I no longer worry about my table count.

Downswings are a part of poker. If you can't afford to deal with a downswing at a certain stake you should not be playing it in the first place.

I also play mtts, 18 mans and cap games and don't really worry about rakeback all that much although I will likely get more vpps this year than I ever have.
05-03-2015 , 10:36 AM
yeah games are soft but i seem pointless moving up as no traffic, im running at 10% roi n i cant even move up, think i need to play more haha
05-09-2015 , 02:43 PM
if you would have 10% roi then you could move up, its bs
05-10-2015 , 06:15 PM
ive played like 800 games this year n donked of a bunch playing casino games lol
05-16-2015 , 06:51 AM
can confirm games are in good shape. gl everyone

m