Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzz
I changed the word "hand" in the title to the word "game" and then the converter worked. Evidently Poker Stars made a change in their wording and a change in a word or an extra symbol more or less can affect the converter.
ah yeah..thanx
I'd want to (and would) play this starting hand too.
And then I'd bet this flop myself, but I'm thinking you know better than I do. I'd bet the flop instead of checking because I'd more or less expect Villain to bet in the absence of a bet from Hero, and then we don't know if Villain has an eight (or better) or not.
However, if we bet and get raised, we still don't know and then we're in worse shape than if we had simply checked. You can sort of see the all-in force coming here. I hate to gamble that Villain has no eight (or pair of kings). Before there's any action, odds are he probably doesn't, but then when he goes nuts on the flop or even calls Hero's out of position lead bet, it's very scary.
I'm interested in your thoughts.
Buzz
Yeah villain had been very laggy/spewy since i had seen him and we seemed to be getting into a few battles and he had had got aggro with some pretty lol hands. However i still think my image was pretty solid and and hes not 3 betting me with trash but his range was defo way wider than your normal reg say.
So ye i am just not folding here preflop especially when the shorty limp stacks off. I have quite a few chips less than second also and this is a good spot to make sure 4th is busted and get a load of chips off the spewy villain and go for the win.
Can't see the hand right now but didnt seem any point in shoving pre as i had no FE and i am not stacking off on all flops.
However at the time when the flop came i felt i had no choice but to get the rest in and the best chance seemed to be check calling as if lead i am not gettin called by worse. I defo would not have put it past villain to shove with worse than ak.
So had to hope for 2 things. aggro villain is spewin and limp caller doesnt turn up with an 8.
1 out of 2 seemed a reasonable result imo and i was kinda happy with 3rd as i came into ft about 6th i think.
The 2 guys chopped for 4k and they weren't exactly very solid players so a bit disapointed in that respect but saying that i havnt had a decent result in a 215 for so long.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pureklas
You are the sb.
haha...not sure whether or not i meant to say that in my drunk state!
Anyway, i'd expect villain to have AAxx here the vast majority of the time and fold. I'd need a read on his 3betting and cbetting tendencies to do anything else.
ye as i said above this villain defo wasnt turning up with aces most of the time imo but..he did..so possibly i was wrong and either he wasnt quite as spewy as i thought or my image was tighter than i though. Trying not to be results orientated for this hand is a bit tough ha
If limper had bailed i would have thought harder about folding.