Quote:
Originally Posted by amok
Again, you haven't read what I wrote. Start from the first post.
OK I will
Quote:
"You start off wanting to check/call/bet less than pot" came directly from your imagination, I never said anything like that.
OK so this wasn't you then in the very first post .....?
Quote:
Originally Posted by amok
I would play every street the same way you did.
I think you will find OP's line was check/call/bet less than pot
Quote:
Originally Posted by amok
(not strong enough to bet-getin imo).
Quote:
Originally Posted by amok
As can be concluded from my last post, I don't think it's clearly +EV to bet-getin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by amok
55% high equity in a board with two low cards is not that much either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by amok
That doesn't mean I don't check-raise.
Because obviously if we don't want to bet get-in the next best thing is check/raise, especially when 55% high equity isn't that much 4-handed and the check/raise would leave us pot committed LOL
This must be because .........
Quote:
Originally Posted by amok
There is nothing scary in poker for me.
But it's fine because we have math and GTO to rely on, nope, wait .......
Quote:
My take on it is that it (GTO) doesn't yet exist for PLO8
BUT
Quote:
a PLO8-solver says you need to lead 0,8% of your hands in this spot)... Since in practice we are extremely far from a GTO-approach in PLO8, I don't think you should be leaning much towards attempting to "play GTO", since you don't even have any idea what it is.
I'm glad that despite GTO not existing for PLO8 that you both know what GTO is and how to apply it in this situation
Quote:
I really have no time for this nonsense.
Conversing with you is a chore. I just wanted to show everyone what a hypocrite and untalented poker player you really are before I forget about your existence
