Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
ZOMG!  Glenn Beck sez Obama flunky loves Mao! ZOMG!  Glenn Beck sez Obama flunky loves Mao!

10-22-2009 , 10:48 PM
"In the days when the Führer was being challenged even within his own party on his plan to exterminate the Jews of Europe, the Jews and their allies controlled many major businesses, they controlled many major banks, they owned many major newspapers and magazines. They were protected by the rule of law, by trial by jury, and by laws against robbery, kidnapping, and murder. They had everything on their side and people said to Hitler, 'How can you win, how can you do this, how can you do this against all of the odds against you?' And Hitler said, 'You fight your war and do your destruction and I'll fight mine and do my destruction.'"
B-
10-22-2009 , 10:51 PM
all this bickering needs to stop right mao
10-22-2009 , 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by derosnec
all this bickering needs to stop right mao
C+
10-22-2009 , 10:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigdaddydvo
Nice article here how Anita Dunn gets a pass for this, but Trent Lott got destroyed in 2002 for praising Strom Thurmond at his 100th birthday because he was endorsing Thurmond's formerly segregationalist policies ldo.
Quote:
She has dared to present the words of this monster as a source of inspiration to youth!

Perhaps she would like to rephrase her remarks. Perhaps she would like to substitute Adolf Hitler for Mao Tse-tung. Perhaps she would like to say something like this:

"In the days when the Führer was being challenged even within his own party on his plan to exterminate the Jews of Europe, the Jews and their allies controlled many major businesses, they controlled many major banks, they owned many major newspapers and magazines. They were protected by the rule of law, by trial by jury, and by laws against robbery, kidnapping, and murder. They had everything on their side and people said to Hitler, 'How can you win, how can you do this, how can you do this against all of the odds against you?' And Hitler said, 'You fight your war and do your destruction and I'll fight mine and do my destruction.'"
Wait, now we've moved from she said Mao was her "favorite political philosopher" to she's guilty because she invoked Mao at all to "inspire youth"?

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...oryId=89511940


Quote:
Despite the meltdown of his near-bankrupt campaign, McCain showed no outward signs of despair--not even when one reporter impishly asked him whether we have a better chance of winning in Iraq than he does at winning the nomination. I braced for a flash of McCain's famous temper, but instead he just chuckled. "In the words of Chairman Mao, it's always darkest before it's black," McCain cracked.
Quote:
"I think we had some difficulties and righted the ship," McCain told Letterman. "For a while there, I was reminded of the words of Chairman Mao, who said it's always darkest before it's totally black."
John McCain dared to present the words of this monster as a way to inspire himself to keep campaigning! Perhaps he would like to rephrase his remarks. Perhaps he would like to substitute Adolf Hitler for Mao Tse-tung. Perhaps he would like to say something like this:

"I think we had some difficulties and righted the ship," McCain told Letterman. "For a while there, I was reminded of the words of the Fuhrer Adolf Hitler, who said it's always darkest before it's totally black."

mises.org ftw
10-22-2009 , 11:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayTeeMe
C+
probably too generous
10-22-2009 , 11:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by derosnec
probably too generous
It was okay, B-
10-22-2009 , 11:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Wait, now we've moved from she said Mao was her "favorite political philosopher" to she's guilty because she invoked Mao at all to "inspire youth"?

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...oryId=89511940






John McCain dared to present the words of this monster as a way to inspire himself to keep campaigning! Perhaps he would like to rephrase his remarks. Perhaps he would like to substitute Adolf Hitler for Mao Tse-tung. Perhaps he would like to say something like this:

"I think we had some difficulties and righted the ship," McCain told Letterman. "For a while there, I was reminded of the words of the Fuhrer Adolf Hitler, who said it's always darkest before it's totally black."

mises.org ftw
I think a guy who was tortured and had the **** kicked out of him for 5 1/2 years by really bad folks who were arguably de facto Mao underlings can get away with quoting the great Chairman without leaving the slightest bit of ambiguity as to where his loyalties or admirations are.
10-22-2009 , 11:52 PM
Now, it makes sense. Dunn is part of the global communist movement:

Quote:
Mao's figure is largely symbolic both in China and in the global communist movement as a whole.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mao_Zedong
10-22-2009 , 11:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Probably because most of American doesn't share Glenn Beck's antipathy towards reading.

The point Dunn was making was 100% acceptable to anyone who isn't involved in some sort of guilt-by-association political attack. I would've thought after the Wright and Ayers things flopped so badly during the election you would've learned you're lesson about this ****. Reasonable people don't care.

this
10-23-2009 , 12:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigdaddydvo
I think a guy who was tortured and had the **** kicked out of him for 5 1/2 years by really bad folks who were arguably de facto Mao underlings can get away with quoting the great Chairman without leaving the slightest bit of ambiguity as to where his loyalties or admirations are.
Ad hominen ldo but alright, whatever, you do get extra credit for finding an especially appealing ad hominem with respect to McCain fwiw. Anyway:

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/10/...unn/index.html

Quote:
"War is politics with blood; politics is war without blood," Gingrich said, citing Mao.
Newt Gingrich dared to present the words of this monster as a way to legitimize his politicking! Perhaps he would like to rephrase his remarks. Perhaps he would like to substitute Adolf Hitler for Mao Tse-tung. Perhaps he would like to say something like this:

"War is politics with blood; politics is war without blood," Gingrich said, citing Hitler."

mises.org ftw

I'm sure that, of course, there will be some very special personal circumstances that allows Gingrich to quote Mao and be beyond reproach which for whatever reason don't apply to Dunn.
10-23-2009 , 12:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
I'm sure that, of course, there will be some very special personal circumstances that allows Gingrich to quote Mao and be beyond reproach which for whatever reason don't apply to Dunn.
He's a republican LDO.
10-23-2009 , 01:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElliotR
Dude, you said

Some 98% of the S. Vietnamese people approved of Diem before he was killed

Never mind that getting 98% of a large population to approve of any government is essentially impossible in the best of circumstances. At the time Diem was killed there had been months of unrest and protests including monks sitting in the middle of Saigon intersections, pouring gasoline over themselves, and burning themselves to death. He was killed by his own army. So yeah, it's absurd.
Well you realize the protests had nothing to do with pro-communism and everything to do with religion, right? It is obvious he wasn't as liked after he started persecuting various religious factions, but that wasn't even the point. He was killed by ARVN generals in a coup not born out of some widespread pro-communist sympathy, but because Diem was a moron when it came to handling the Buddhist unrest. At the time of his election, however, he enjoyed much popularity due to his anti-communism (which was the main platform he ran under). This is completely irrelevant, however, as the point is and has always been that the majority of S. Vietnamese people were anti-communist before AND after Diem, thus demonstrating Schlitz mmmm's assertion that the Vietcong were a "rather a large % of the south vietnam population" to be fallacious.
10-23-2009 , 02:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Ad hominen ldo but alright, whatever, you do get extra credit for finding an especially appealing ad hominem with respect to McCain fwiw. Anyway:

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/10/...unn/index.html



Newt Gingrich dared to present the words of this monster as a way to legitimize his politicking! Perhaps he would like to rephrase his remarks. Perhaps he would like to substitute Adolf Hitler for Mao Tse-tung. Perhaps he would like to say something like this:

"War is politics with blood; politics is war without blood," Gingrich said, citing Hitler."

mises.org ftw

I'm sure that, of course, there will be some very special personal circumstances that allows Gingrich to quote Mao and be beyond reproach which for whatever reason don't apply to Dunn.
Because quoting someone and saying they are one of your favorite philosophers is exactly the same thing. amirite?
10-23-2009 , 02:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackWhite
Because quoting someone and saying they are one of your favorite philosophers is exactly the same thing. amirite?
10-23-2009 , 11:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boris
Your selection of which part of her speech was situational irony is the moral equivalent of quoting out of context. According you, what she really meant to say is:

"The third lesson and tip actually comes from two of my least favorite political philosophers: Mao Zedong and Mother Theresa -- not often coupled with each other, but the two people I turn to least to basically deliver a simple point which is: you're going to make choices; you're going to challenge; you're going to say why not; you're going to figure out how to do things that have never been done before. But here's the deal: These are your choices, they are no one else's. In 1947, when Mao Zedong was being challenged within his own party on his plan to basically take China over. Chiang Kai-shek and the Nationalist Chinese held the cities, they had the army, they had the air force, they had everything on their side. And people said, "How can you win? How can you do this? How can you do this, against all of the odds against you?" And Mao Zedong said, you know, "You fight your war, and I'll fight mine." And think about that for a second. You don't have to accept the definition of how to do things and you don't have to follow other peoples choices and paths. Ok? It is about your choices and your path. You fight your own war, you lay out your own path, you figure out what's right for you. You don't let external definition define how good you are internally, you fight your war, you let them fight theirs. Everybody has their own path.
+1

This basically blows the "irony" defense out of the water.
10-23-2009 , 11:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Ad hominen ldo but alright, whatever, you do get extra credit for finding an especially appealing ad hominem with respect to McCain fwiw. Anyway:

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/10/...unn/index.html



Newt Gingrich dared to present the words of this monster as a way to legitimize his politicking! Perhaps he would like to rephrase his remarks. Perhaps he would like to substitute Adolf Hitler for Mao Tse-tung. Perhaps he would like to say something like this:

"War is politics with blood; politics is war without blood," Gingrich said, citing Hitler."

mises.org ftw

I'm sure that, of course, there will be some very special personal circumstances that allows Gingrich to quote Mao and be beyond reproach which for whatever reason don't apply to Dunn.
wtf
10-23-2009 , 11:53 AM
Quote:
In 1947, when Mao Zedong was being challenged within his own party on his plan to basically take China over. Chiang Kai-shek and the Nationalist Chinese held the cities, they had the army, they had the air force, they had everything on their side. And people said, "How can you win? How can you do this? How can you do this, against all of the odds against you?" And Mao Zedong said, you know, "You fight your war, and I'll fight mine."
Dunn is right, this is an inspriational underdog story if I've heard one. I could see this played out on film:

"Mao, you're 5 foot nothin', 100 and nothin', and you have barely a speck of natural ability. And you hung in there with Chiang Kai-shek and the Nationalist Chinese who held the cities, had the army, had the air force, and had everything on their side for almost 20 years. And you're gonna walk outta here and found the People's Republic of China. In this life, you don't have to prove nothin' to nobody but yourself. And after what you've gone through, if you haven't done that by now, it ain't gonna never happen."
10-23-2009 , 12:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigdaddydvo
Dunn is right, this is an inspriational underdog story if I've heard one. I could see this played out on film:

"Mao, you're 5 foot nothin', 100 and nothin', and you have barely a speck of natural ability. And you hung in there with Chiang Kai-shek and the Nationalist Chinese who held the cities, had the army, had the air force, and had everything on their side for almost 20 years. And you're gonna walk outta here and found the People's Republic of China. In this life, you don't have to prove nothin' to nobody but yourself. And after what you've gone through, if you haven't done that by now, it ain't gonna never happen."
Meh, Mao was helped more by the United States ability to make decisions against it's own self interest than his own genius. Though adherents to his cult of personality will never agree to that.
10-23-2009 , 12:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Ad hominen ldo but alright, whatever, you do get extra credit for finding an especially appealing ad hominem with respect to McCain fwiw. Anyway:

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/10/...unn/index.html



Newt Gingrich dared to present the words of this monster as a way to legitimize his politicking! Perhaps he would like to rephrase his remarks. Perhaps he would like to substitute Adolf Hitler for Mao Tse-tung. Perhaps he would like to say something like this:

"War is politics with blood; politics is war without blood," Gingrich said, citing Hitler."

mises.org ftw

I'm sure that, of course, there will be some very special personal circumstances that allows Gingrich to quote Mao and be beyond reproach which for whatever reason don't apply to Dunn.
Oh come on now. Quoting an aphorism attributed to Mao is not the same thing as saying he is one of your favorite political philosophers and then relating an inspirational story about Mao's life.
10-23-2009 , 12:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackWhite
Because quoting someone and saying they are one of your favorite philosophers is exactly the same thing. amirite?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borodog
wtf
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boris
Oh come on now. Quoting an aphorism attributed to Mao is not the same thing as saying he is one of your favorite political philosophers and then relating an inspirational story about Mao's life.
Did any of you guys actually read what bigdaddy linked to and what I was responding to?:

Quote:
Wait, now we've moved from she said Mao was her "favorite political philosopher" to she's guilty because she invoked Mao at all to "inspire youth"?
mises.org author went off because she quoted Mao at all, then went all "hurr hurr hurr what if we take what she said and attribute it to Hitler, is that okay, hurr hurr?!?!?"

Well, if that's the new standard, why can't I take when Gingrich and McCain quoted Mao, wonder aloud what would happen if I attribute the quotes to Hitler instead?

If you think the distinguishing variable here is "she said Mao is her favorite philosopher", I've already addressed that, but your problem is actually with the mises.org author, who thinks invoking Mao is monstrous in and of itself and got all indignant about it.

Is it REALLY too much to ask for you guys to READ THE THREADS.

Last edited by DVaut1; 10-23-2009 at 12:56 PM.
10-23-2009 , 12:57 PM
Fwiw McCain and Gingrich are both pretty much asshats as well so who gives a **** if they quote other asshats?
10-23-2009 , 01:21 PM
13th 4postle, out of curiosity: why do you think that, after calling Mao and Mother Theresa two of her favorite political philosophers, she said that they are not often "coupled with each other"? What was the point of that aside?
10-23-2009 , 01:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigdaddydvo
I think a guy who was tortured and had the **** kicked out of him for 5 1/2 years by really bad folks who were arguably de facto Mao underlings can get away with quoting the great Chairman without leaving the slightest bit of ambiguity as to where his loyalties or admirations are.
What a ****ing ridiculous comment.
10-23-2009 , 01:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Did any of you guys actually read what bigdaddy linked to and what I was responding to?:



mises.org author went off because she quoted Mao at all...
No. No he didn't. He went off because in his words:

"Her [Dunn's] remarks were not limited to a casual comment that had vicious implications. Rather they constituted a prolonged, blatantly explicit, and far more fundamental endorsement of an incalculably worse person and program than did those of Trent Lott. She has dared to say that one of her "favorite political philosophers" is one of the greatest mass murderers in the history of the world, a man whose takeover of China was responsible for as many as 70 million deaths during his reign. She has dared to present the words of this monster as a source of inspiration to youth!
10-23-2009 , 02:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the hobo who wandered near mises.org's public library login
She has dared to present the words of this monster as a source of inspiration to youth!
No bad person's words should ever be uttered within earshot of a minor! In Glenn Beck's America(an America of Freedom and Liberty) such conduct would be a stoning offense.

Trent Lott was endorsing Thurmond's policies and political platform by saying that America would be better off had we elected him, Dunn was saying that she likes to use Mao as a historical example to prove a point.

      
m