Why is the establishment anti-Huckabee? - Page 3 - Politics and Economics

Two Plus Two Forums Other Topics Politics

Why is the establishment anti-Huckabee?

...

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3

01-16-2008 , 05:08 PM

#51

Gregatron

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 7,422

Quote:

Originally Posted by The 13th 4postle

Don't forget that Rush Limbaugh hates Huckabee and they probably share the same audience.

I usually turn into the crazy right wing Christian radio for sh*ts and giggles while driving home. I just started back to work so I will keep an ear out.

My own thought is that people like Dobson and Robertson are more shills for the more elitist Republican establishment to contain the rabble of the Christian "right." I would be very surprised to see Dobson endorse Huck. (I know the Robertson has already endorsed Giuliani.)

01-16-2008 , 05:10 PM

#52

SenorKeeed

mew mew mew

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 37,478

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moseley

When is the last time the U.S. had a genius running the country? Not in my lifetime. DOB 6/12/54.

Nixon was a genius. Bill Clinton is probably close to as smart as Nixon. I'm not sure what your definition of "genius" is, but both of these guys were substantially more intelligent than the average American.

01-17-2008 , 12:16 PM

#53

AndysDaddy

grinder

Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 435

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndysDaddy

A quick Google reveals many links back to this report: http://lovenstein.org/report/

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexM

BTW, another quick Google reveals:

http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/H...ute_IQ_Report/

Fox News owns Snopes, MuseumOfHoexes, etc ldo

01-17-2008 , 01:26 PM

#54

KneeCo

Mother FAQer

Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 7,958

Quote:

Is it your goal to bring the Constitution into strict conformity with the Bible? Some people would consider that a kind of dangerous undertaking, particularly given the variety of biblical interpretations.

Huck: Well, I don’t think that’s a radical view to say we’re going to affirm marriage. I think the radical view is to say that we’re going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal. Again, once we change the definition, the door is open to change it again. I think the radical position is to make a change in what’s been historic.

full interview.

Gay sex = Orgy with 12 year olds and puppies LDO.

and so many other instances, including of course the "Iran report??", "Change the Constitution to reflect God's will speech" and the "Pulled a negative ad.... here it is" gems.

Fwiw, I actually enjoy Huck's presence, the way he approaches opponents and fashion in which he speaks on some domestic issues; but the man isn't close to qualified for the WH.

01-18-2008 , 12:30 AM

#55

zer0

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 5,835

he's already compared homosexuality to necrophilia and pedophilia, beastiality is the next logical step.

i agree though, he's fun to have around. im just not sure how he's getting enough support to stick around.

01-19-2008 , 01:40 AM

#56

KUJustin

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,346

My only question is if the Bush is dumb thing is a complete hoax why does he stick to it so strictly even now?

I mean, I'm not saying he has to come out and say "hahahaha, gotcha!" but why stay so committed to it?

01-19-2008 , 03:47 PM

#57

Max Raker

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 15,738

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexM

You mean other than all of these?

I mean seriously. You have to be joking. Every single one of these men is probably in the 110-135 range. The last two Democrats at 175+? Do you have any idea how rare 175+ is? It's like 1 in 100 million, maybe rarer. Einstein had an IQ of just over 160. This list is ridiculously absurd Democratic propaganda.

Something like this would be much more realistic:

143 James E. Carter (D)
137 Ronald W. Reagan (R)
115 George H. W. Bush (R)
126 William J. Clinton (D)
121 George W. Bush (R)

Why would Clinton not be the highest? He has the most impressive academic record by far. I know many smart people do not do well in school but given that you did as well as Clinton you have to be very smart.

01-19-2008 , 08:02 PM

#58

NeBlis

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 12,039

Quote:

Originally Posted by Max Raker

Clinton is a fantastic talker and quite smart ... but genius???

COME ON ! it doesnt take a genius to figure out that if your going to abuse your office to get laid then don't do it with a buch of vile seahags.Then when you get busted, geniuses don't trot out some lame lies about "is" untill they are finaly forced to fess up.

01-20-2008 , 05:52 AM

#59

AlexM

ignored

Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 20,655

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeBlis

WTF have you got against sea hags?

Page 3 of 3

First

1 2 3

Last

...

Page 3 of 3

First

1 2 3

Last