Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Who Will Be The 2016 Republican Nominee? (It's Donald Trump) Who Will Be The 2016 Republican Nominee? (It's Donald Trump)

01-04-2016 , 09:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
itt we learn there are protectionist, interventionist Libertarians.
Who knew?
01-04-2016 , 09:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
itt we learn there are protectionist, interventionist Libertarians.
to be fair, the libertarians have always seemed a bit confused about what they really would like to do.
01-04-2016 , 09:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan
There are Republicans like myself that don't like nafta and such

I'm libertarian enough that I could become a Democrat but it's mostly that I think we spend too much on social programs, I'm against Obama care, I'm in favor of ground troops against isis, I believe in tax cuts on businesses and capital gains, I'm pro Israel and even the Jewish democrats obviously aren't, I'm in favor of limiting middle east immigration, I'm not for a path to citizenship for illegals, I'm pro death penalty, I'm pro police, etc etc

So I agree with the dems on tariffs and Marijuana. That means I should be a dem I guess Matthew
Cutting taxes and social programs and legalising marijuana are mainstream conservative positions (over a third of Republicans support legalization and that is climbing rapidly as the olds die off). There's nothing in your beliefs that is counter to conservatism and a hell of a lot that is diametrically opposed to libertarianism (foreign intervention, limiting immigration, death penalty, pro-police, protectionism).
01-04-2016 , 09:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrindisReal
the only difference I see between Thayer and Gnarly is # of posts itt. Unbelievable how Thayer's personal views on Trump, & people actually debating with him at great length on stuff like why Trump's call to ban Muslims is bad, have completely hijacked the thread

I feel like the liberals itt would debate a KKK member for days on why civil rights are a good thing and why slavery is bad... etc. Just an insatiable desire to argue with people who are not going to change their views on super bigoted stuff.

Thayer still being addressed and treated like an adult at this stage is beyond me. He is like an ikes but worse as far as this specific thread is concerned
whatever, i got some of his free money
01-04-2016 , 09:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakmelk
How did I just call this place ? I'm not going to entertain the kneejerkers in here, that would be a true waste of my time, I just replied to this topic as an observer. You can go back and reread it with your objective glasses on if you like. A lot of you guys keep thinking that you're never wrong especially if you dislike the poster that is making the arguments. The ikes discussion about confiscation of arms was a great example of it over in that other thread, Im wondering how much of the people that got owned there were aware of it and how many really thought they were on the right side of things (ftr, ikes argument as a whole was terrible but he was right on that specific point).
you shouldnt be allowed to post in this forum after your performance in the OOT skateboarding thread

like seriously that was some all-time worst performance in the history of the internet type ****
01-04-2016 , 09:38 PM
Yeah, nobody willing to prop bet and who is actually going to pay should ever be banned imo. Would be counter to the spirit of this site.
01-04-2016 , 09:39 PM
Jill Colvin ‏@colvinj 12m12 minutes ago
Trump says he wants to remain unpredictable on ISIS, wants to "surprise them one night at about 11:30 when it’s dark” to take their oil.
01-04-2016 , 09:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
I also am completely flummoxed by the idea that it is OK to support Trump because his apparent racism is not sincere. Suppose that's true. Saying a bunch of racist stuff just to get elected is pretty odious. How could anyone support a candidate who would overtly fan racist sentiment just to win an election?
easily, because they're racists who aren't bothered by racism and rather view it as sound politicking
01-04-2016 , 09:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Do you consider Toyotas Japanese and Fords American? That's pretty cute.
While the distinction isn't as bipolar as many consider, saying they're the same because of X% of the assembly/parts happened in the USA is really dumb too. There's a lot more that goes into building cars than just physically putting them together and that cash made from selling the cars goes to different places.

Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
itt we learn there are protectionist, interventionist Libertarians.
LOL wp
01-04-2016 , 09:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Jill Colvin ‏@colvinj 12m12 minutes ago
Trump says he wants to remain unpredictable on ISIS, wants to "surprise them one night at about 11:30 when it’s dark” to take their oil.
I relish the thought of Rand Paul crying into his beer wondering how all of his father's supporters have gravitated to this guy.
01-04-2016 , 10:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
While the distinction isn't as bipolar as many consider, saying they're the same because of X% of the assembly/parts happened in the USA is really dumb too. There's a lot more that goes into building cars than just physically putting them together and that cash made from selling the cars goes to different places.



LOL wp
My idiocy is limited only by your imagination.
01-04-2016 , 10:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Jill Colvin ‏@colvinj 12m12 minutes ago
Trump says he wants to remain unpredictable on ISIS, wants to "surprise them one night at about 11:30 when it’s dark” to take their oil.
this whole "take their oil" stuff is just beyond stupid. wtf, are we just gonna bomb the **** outta them and make syria the 51st state in the union??? turn the country into a police state controlled by us? leave the military there to defend the oil fields in perpetuity? what exactly is the end game here? will somebody in the media PLEASE ask donald how he plans on "taking their oil"? just once?

plus, if we are going to start unilaterally making other countries be part of the usa, there are a helluva lot better choices than syria.
01-04-2016 , 10:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
I relish the thought of Rand Paul crying into his beer wondering how all of his father's supporters have gravitated to this guy.
When you see quotes like that it makes me wonder if Trump is literally a child. He's Benjamin Buttoning or something. "I'll attack ISIS after bedtime and take their stuff" is not some neurolinguistic hypnosis trick, it's how a child thinks about the world.
01-04-2016 , 10:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
Says the libertarian about the most isolationist candidate in the field. Or are you an anti-welfare but not isolationist libertarian?

It's almost like policy doesn't matter, only feelings. In fact the same group who swooned over Ron Paul in 2012 is now swooning over the guy who wants to implement sweeping draconian unconstitutional govt powers (but not really - wink).

Hard to imagine what the subconscious common thread could be between Donald Trump and Ron Paul. DEFINITELY NOT RACISM THOUGH.
I'm not at all isolationist. I don't like rand
01-04-2016 , 10:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Do you consider Toyotas Japanese and Fords American? That's pretty cute.
I do.
01-04-2016 , 10:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
Cutting taxes and social programs and legalising marijuana are mainstream conservative positions (over a third of Republicans support legalization and that is climbing rapidly as the olds die off). There's nothing in your beliefs that is counter to conservatism and a hell of a lot that is diametrically opposed to libertarianism (foreign intervention, limiting immigration, death penalty, pro-police, protectionism).
Hence I'm a Republican. Idgaf about labels but well named asked why I wasn't a dem
01-04-2016 , 10:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
My idiocy is limited only by your imagination.
uhhhhh you think i characterized your position unfairly? lol seems pretty spot on
01-04-2016 , 10:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
uhhhhh you think i characterized your position unfairly? lol seems pretty spot on
Feel free to quote me where I forgot the economic impact of the sale of a given F-150 on the dividends paid out by F shares and the ensuing economic stimulus.
01-04-2016 , 10:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Feel free to quote me where I forgot the economic impact of the sale of a given F-150 on the dividends paid out by F shares and the ensuing economic stimulus.
you just made fun of as classifying toyota as japanese and ford as american. That's largely correct.
01-04-2016 , 11:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
you just made fun of as classifying toyota as japanese and ford as american. That's largely correct.
The reason he did that was within economic context of "Buy American!"
Try to follow along pls
01-04-2016 , 11:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan
There are Republicans like myself that don't like nafta and such

I'm libertarian enough that I could become a Democrat but it's mostly that I think we spend too much on social programs, I'm against Obama care, I'm in favor of ground troops against isis, I believe in tax cuts on businesses and capital gains, I'm pro Israel and even the Jewish democrats obviously aren't, I'm in favor of limiting middle east immigration, I'm not for a path to citizenship for illegals, I'm pro death penalty, I'm pro police, etc etc

So I agree with the dems on tariffs and Marijuana. That means I should be a dem I guess Matthew
You listed literally there libertarian beliefs two of which are just mainstream conservative positions.

I am more libertarian than you. Not even close either it seems.
01-04-2016 , 11:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccotenj
this whole "take their oil" stuff is just beyond stupid. wtf, are we just gonna bomb the **** outta them and make syria the 51st state in the union??? turn the country into a police state controlled by us? leave the military there to defend the oil fields in perpetuity? what exactly is the end game here? will somebody in the media PLEASE ask donald how he plans on "taking their oil"? just once?

plus, if we are going to start unilaterally making other countries be part of the usa, there are a helluva lot better choices than syria.
The bigger point is Isis doesn't really have oil. They stole oil via plunder and we condemned them for it. So stealing it by plunder from them doesn't make us moral, it had to be given back to the original owners.

Its like a police force finding the guy who burgled you and keeping your tv to reward himself for the effort.
01-04-2016 , 11:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lilu7
The reason he did that was within economic context of "Buy American!"
Try to follow along pls
lol that's not the context at all.
01-04-2016 , 11:27 PM
Just stopping in to remind everyone

#NotResonating
01-04-2016 , 11:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan
There are Republicans like myself that don't like nafta and such

I'm libertarian enough that I could become a Democrat but it's mostly that I think we spend too much on social programs, I'm against Obama care, I'm in favor of ground troops against isis, I believe in tax cuts on businesses and capital gains, I'm pro Israel and even the Jewish democrats obviously aren't, I'm in favor of limiting middle east immigration, I'm not for a path to citizenship for illegals, I'm pro death penalty, I'm pro police, etc etc

So I agree with the dems on tariffs and Marijuana. That means I should be a dem I guess Matthew
I've gotta tell you... I'm not sure you know what libertarian means.

      
m