Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Who Will Be The 2016 Republican Nominee? (It's Donald Trump) Who Will Be The 2016 Republican Nominee? (It's Donald Trump)

09-19-2015 , 12:19 AM
I think you got me banned once for making some obvious joke about bombing something.
09-19-2015 , 12:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
I think you got me banned once for making some obvious joke about bombing something.
dont think so in the way you mean, and I don't ban or get people banned bro.
09-19-2015 , 12:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexM
Just don't say anything supportive of Hitler committing suicide.

lol it was specifically for 'celebrating assassination'
09-19-2015 , 12:25 AM
Why don't you link the offending post.
09-19-2015 , 12:37 AM
If Jeb! is going to claim "My brother kept us safe" you can't expect us to just play along and pretend he did just to protect the Bushes' tender feelings.


GWB did not "keep us safe" by any reasonable measure, and anyone claiming he did is full of crap.
09-19-2015 , 12:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPoppa
If Jeb! is going to claim "My brother kept us safe" you can't expect us to just play along and pretend he did just to protect the Bushes' tender feelings.


GWB did not "keep us safe" by any reasonable measure, and anyone claiming he did is full of crap.

Plenty of people were convinced that we were going to be attacked again after 9/11 and we were not. I assume you think nobody tried and to this day Obama is droning people for fun.
09-19-2015 , 12:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by schu_22
Why don't you link the offending post.
because it's deleted. I could quote it because I got an infraction too (lol), but that probably gets another ban. How I described it was 100% correct. Can't say the death of someone 80 years ago resulted in good for america.
09-19-2015 , 12:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
dont think so in the way you mean, and I don't ban or get people banned bro.
I can't find the post. But basically I think some yahoos threw some kind of improvised bomb at one of the occupy camps - which turned out to be like a giant firecracker. I made a joke that bahba or mike clark or one of those frothy guys did it. You flipped out and made a gigantic deal out of it.

And then I got this:



My second to last banning!
09-19-2015 , 12:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Talking about home soil, so japan obviously. We weren't neutral at all in the build up of ww2. We didn't have to supply britain with arms and money, but we did. We didn't have to embargo japan and support china, but we did that too.

Note that doesn't make them bad things, just that we didn't get dragged into ww2 kicking and screaming. It's a ****ing hilariously stupid argument to say that GWB made us less safe because of an attack 8 months into administration that had been planned for years. **** it would have been dumb in 2005. Blaming him for all terrorism after is dumb too.... but whatever, go team!
Ok. I just meant WWII, especially in Europe, wasn't much Roosevelt's fault as before the war we were one of the players at best, not the world leader.

But, as far as GWB goes, the point still stands that he made us less safe if you include our military as part of us. You can't necessarily say the same of FDR because we could have easily been a hell of a lot less safe if Germany and Japan weren't defeated.
09-19-2015 , 12:58 AM
Forget 9/11. GWB made us less safe by invading Iraq and destabilizing the whole damn region - instead of focusing all our efforts on Afghanistan. Saddam Hussein wasn't going to threaten the US in any way. That was 100% on him.
09-19-2015 , 01:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
I can't find the post. But basically I think some yahoos threw some kind of improvised bomb at one of the occupy camps - which turned out to be like a giant firecracker. I made a joke that bahba or mike clark or one of those frothy guys did it. You flipped out and made a gigantic deal out of it.

And then I got this:



My second to last banning!
oh so you made an obvious personal attack, but it was a joke at the expense of someone you don't like, so you thought it was ok? Alrighty then suzzer.
09-19-2015 , 01:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
Ok. I just meant WWII, especially in Europe, wasn't much Roosevelt's fault as before the war we were one of the players at best, not the world leader.
I know what you meant. It's just not relevant. We didn't have to get involved. We did.
Quote:
But, as far as GWB goes, the point still stands that he made us less safe if you include our military as part of us. You can't necessarily say the same of FDR because we could have easily been a hell of a lot less safe if Germany and Japan weren't defeated.
lol wut? I'm not trying to make a serious argument that FDR made us less safe, just making fun of a set of moronic logic about how bush failed to stop 9/11.
09-19-2015 , 01:33 AM
http://www.oddschecker.com/politics/...ican-candidate

took the highest odds and did (1/(x+1))*100, like horse racing

highest odds
2 Bush
5.8 Trump
6 Rubio
17 Walker
11 Fiorina
14 Carson
17 Kasich
26 Cruz
33 Huckabee
40 Cristie
61 Paul

win percentage based on highest odds
33.33 Bush
14.71 Trump
14.29 Rubio
5.56 Walker
8.33 Fiorina
6.67 Carson
5.56 Kasich
3.70 Cruz
2.94 Huckabee
2.44 Cristie
1.61 Paul
99.13


Wish I lived in England for betting, seems so beatable. Seems much better than a poll.

Last edited by steelhouse; 09-19-2015 at 01:38 AM.
09-19-2015 , 01:47 AM
Barbara Boxer Blasts Carly Fiorina

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/0...na-2016-213842

It's clear to see that there's no love lost between these two women.
09-19-2015 , 01:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
dont think so in the way you mean, and I don't ban or get people banned bro.
ikes, would you estimate that you are/aren't one of the top post reporters in this forum outside of the Israel/Palestine thread?

(in b4 "reporting posts isn't getting people banned")
09-19-2015 , 02:12 AM
Whining about a richly-deserved ban in multiple forums? Def not mad, no siree.

Take it up with ATF. Or just perma him already.
09-19-2015 , 03:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan C. Lawhon
Barbara Boxer Blasts Carly Fiorina

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/0...na-2016-213842

It's clear to see that there's no love lost between these two women.
I believe she puts the CEO ahead of the shareholder. She supported Dell taking his company private, yet Icahn basically said Dell stole several $ billion (youtube/google Icahn Dell). When she was at HP, she supported all these visas yet today she is against illegal immigration. She comes from the era where CEOS are suppose to make all the money, the employees get the big salaries, and the shareholders get to break even to inflation - a silicon valley bum ceo. I have looked at stats from 1988 to 2014 at HPQ, but I need to look at them again. Her actions might have increase profits 75% but I need to double check and it is less than HP past. HP present is pure value. Firing employees is a good sign, you only get fired if you do not add to the bottom line. If your division is the palm pilot or a mainframe your division might be obsolete. If people want to give HP employees jobs go out and buy palm pilots.

Seems her goal is not to make the country great again, but to get a new CEO job. Trump actually loses on his immigration plans. The more immigrants the higher rent at his apartments. He wants a nation of laws. His goal is to make the best country or world possible, not to get a job.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOT5R761YeA

Last edited by steelhouse; 09-19-2015 at 04:07 AM.
09-19-2015 , 04:31 AM
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos...onference-1025

From minute 11:20. Wrong link above. Fiorina supports Dell regarding private deal.

Last edited by steelhouse; 09-19-2015 at 04:44 AM.
09-19-2015 , 06:28 AM
This Is The Ad That Could Sink Carly Fiorina's Campaign

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/t...inas-campaign/

This is further evidence as to why I think the Republicans could wind up with no clear nominee going into their convention with their nominee being chosen via a fractious brokered convention. Like Herman Cain four years ago, Carly is the flavor of the moment, but the Super PACs have yet to begin firing the big artillery in the form of negative TV ads.

Ted Cruz is gambling on the March 1st "Super Tuesday" primaries in which he seems to believe he will win several deep South states - including my state of Alabama. Cruz recently appeared with my Congressman, Mo Brooks, during a campaign swing through Alabama. In a moment of true political courage, (Ha! Ha!), when asked by a reporter if he was prepared to endorse Ted Cruz, Mo quietly demurred. (With Cruz literally standing right next to him, the picture was in the newspaper, Mo declared that it was "too early" to formally endorse any Republican candidate "at this time ...")

So let's suppose Trump wins one or two of the early primary states while Ted Cruz manages to reap a harvest of delegates on Super Tuesday - and Carly Fiorina manages to win somewhere. Add in the mix Ben Carson winning the Maryland primary, (or whatever state he's from), Rand Paul winning in his own state of Kentucky, Scott Walker [possibly] winning in Wisconsin and Governor John Kasich winning the primary in his state of Ohio. (Who knows, even Chris Christie might manage to win a state - somewhere ...)

You start to see the picture ... The Republicans could be on their way to a brokered convention. Of course, for a "librul" like me, this will be popcorn time indeed.

Last edited by Alan C. Lawhon; 09-19-2015 at 06:49 AM.
09-19-2015 , 06:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Quote:
Prediction: Hillary won't suggest tithing as a basis for the tax code because "God is a pretty fair guy", deny climate change, or claim vaccines cause autism. She'll do fine.
Hope she tells the one about the time she was under sniper fire. Or how she left office dead broke. Most topical how she set up that private server so she could carry one device
Hilarious that you think these things are even remotely comparable.
09-19-2015 , 06:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
for saying that a historical figure that was assassinated 80 years ago was a good thing for america
You should have pointed out that John Hinckley's lack of marksmanship was bad for America.
09-19-2015 , 07:44 AM
lou seems a bit unhinged recently, tbh
09-19-2015 , 07:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
A lot of things, but I was early to see her value of her as a running mate. Very well prepared, disciplined, and can deliver a punch. She would make a great attack dog to go after Hillary. The gender dynamics is tricky being a woman makes it easier to go hard. Hell half the job of a VP candidate is doing well in the debate and she has demonstrated value there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPoppa
She's extremely poised and articulate while spewing total bull****. That's the most important thing in a GOP nominee.
nailed it
09-19-2015 , 08:21 AM
Proof Positive That Seattle Lou Is A Political Savant

http://fortune.com/2015/09/18/carly-...republican-vp/

Question: What does this post and the Titanic both have in common?
Answer: The number 1912.
09-19-2015 , 08:40 AM
uhhh its been pretty obvious since all the attention that was given to her after the first debate, that she was likely being vetted for VP

she literally didnt say or do anything other than "look at me i didnt take any money from trump" (right, cuz you're a loser and got smoked by barbara boxer in your only run for elected office, TRUMP doesn't back losers), and the media was fawning all over how well she did

      
m