Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Based upon what analysis? He is obviously the most fiscal conservative but his foreign policy views are very much out of step with the Republican party.
You don't need to be in step with the Republican Party to be an actual Republican. The current Republican Party has shifted so far right that they're not really Republicans anymore.
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
His views monetary policy and the drug war are unique and can't be classified as Republican.
I like some of his positions but classifying them as Republican defies logic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Republicans define their platforms every 4 years. You can argue if they are not conservative with much more success then arguing Paul is a Republican.
I said he resembles a Republican, not that is actually is one. His views may be libertariany, but the real reason he's closer to what an actual Republican is than the other candidates is because this country has shifted so deeply into a simultaneous welfare and warfare state that it requires surgery to come back into balance. The other candidates are just band-aids that just perpetuate this shift.
Quote:
Originally Posted by krmont22
Republicans are traditionally anti-war and especially anti-intervention, but obviously I agree that modern day "republicans" want to bomb and kill everyone who is not us.
Quotations around the word "republicans" is appropriate imo. True Republicans would not stand for bloating the size of government, letting religion hijack the discussion of policy, or debts and budget deficits to spiral ever-so-more out of control.