Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
It would be surprising if there isn't more evidence that isn't being shared with the public.
It seems clear that the UK has been presenting evidence to the other counties and it's fairly hard to believe so many would be taking action acting against Russia if they thought there was any plausible chance of evidence emerging that shows someone else was responsible.
It isn't hard to believe at all. It would be more surprising if May failed to get any traction with NATO countries, it would be absurd in fact. The US/UK managed to build a (limited) alliance against sadaam based on a crock of **** to quote the iraqi who originally made the info up. Because it fit the broader agenda of those countries.
It may be Russia. It may not be Russia. According to the high court ruling based on the evidence from the OPCW this could have been done by a non state actor, note the wording
or closely related agent.
Ah but there must be evidence Boris isn't telling us but is telling the rest of the world. We can only assume the evidence he referred to is what has already been sent to the OPCW, that there is nothing more. It would be weird if there was since the response is already underway prior to a full investigation. I doubt we will be hearing much more substantial evidence any time soon.