Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Tragic Death of the Republican Party The Tragic Death of the Republican Party

09-11-2014 , 07:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
ikes only had to go back 21 months for that gotcha.
its the ****ing op of the thread son... it kind of defines what 'tragic death' meant then, and shows dids is walking it back.
09-11-2014 , 07:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
Voter ID would do nothing to eliminate what happened in the first video.

The guy in the second video was joking.

The facebook guy was also joking, something quickly confirmed after the election board was deluged with OUTRAGE from gullible idiots. He also received multiple death threats. For making a joke on the internet.

Awesome cites, dude. You're really on top of this ****.
That's a woman in the second video.
09-11-2014 , 07:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAAASH
That's a woman in the second video.
Sorry, I swapped the video order.

Now, do you have any real evidence?
09-11-2014 , 07:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
Sorry, I swapped the video order.

Now, do you have any real evidence?
lol, so media interviews work in Ferguson but not elsewhere? THESE PEOPLE ARE SAYING THEY VOTED MULTIPLE TIMES. When someone says they saw the gentle giant get shot in the back 10 times you believe them, when someone states they voted multiple times it's not "real evidence."

This is a great microcosm of the left. The EXACT same things (media interviews, social media accounts of events) they use to defend their position in one instance they brush off as not "real evidence" in another.
09-11-2014 , 07:32 PM
The death of the Republican Party as currently constituted does seem inevitable. That is always the case to some extent, things change, but there is too much at stake to expect the status quo to continue on indefinitely.
09-11-2014 , 07:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAAASH
lol, so media interviews work in Ferguson but not elsewhere? THESE PEOPLE ARE SAYING THEY VOTED MULTIPLE TIMES. When someone says they saw the gentle giant get shot in the back 10 times you believe them, when someone states they voted multiple times it's not "real evidence."

This is a great microcosm of the left. The EXACT same things (media interviews, social media accounts of events) they use to defend their position in one instance they brush off as not "real evidence" in another.
Uh, that one lady TRIED to vote twice, she got caught. What's the issue? What is the proposed fix?
09-11-2014 , 07:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAAASH
lol, so media interviews work in Ferguson but not elsewhere? THESE PEOPLE ARE SAYING THEY VOTED MULTIPLE TIMES. When someone says they saw the gentle giant get shot in the back 10 times you believe them, when someone states they voted multiple times it's not "real evidence."

This is a great microcosm of the left. The EXACT same things (media interviews, social media accounts of events) they use to defend their position in one instance they brush off as not "real evidence" in another.
How odd that you chose Ferguson. I mean, I had no idea you would pick that as a rallying point
09-11-2014 , 07:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
ikes only had to go back 21 months for that gotcha.
And a "gotcha" that still has 99 months left before it's actually a gotcha, at that!

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAAASH
This is a great microcosm of the left.
So you're saying that you believe Michael Brown was shot in the back just like the witnesses said? Since you aren't like The Left, of course, and you're entirely consistent in believing all media interviews.
09-11-2014 , 07:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAAASH
lol, so media interviews work in Ferguson but not elsewhere? THESE PEOPLE ARE SAYING THEY VOTED MULTIPLE TIMES. When someone says they saw the gentle giant get shot in the back 10 times you believe them, when someone states they voted multiple times it's not "real evidence."

This is a great microcosm of the left. The EXACT same things (media interviews, social media accounts of events) they use to defend their position in one instance they brush off as not "real evidence" in another.
And again, the two dudes were clearly joking, and the lady would not have been stopped by voter ID.

I know this is hard for you to understand, so take your time. Read the above sentence as many times as necessary.
09-11-2014 , 07:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
And again, the two dudes were clearly joking, and the lady would not have been stopped by voter ID.

I know this is hard for you to understand, so take your time. Read the above sentence as many times as necessary.
Oh ok....CLEEEEEARRRRRRRLY joking. Clearly.
09-11-2014 , 08:04 PM
LOL JAAAAAAAAAAAASH
09-11-2014 , 09:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAAASH
lol, so media interviews work in Ferguson but not elsewhere? THESE PEOPLE ARE SAYING THEY VOTED MULTIPLE TIMES. When someone says they saw the gentle giant get shot in the back 10 times you believe them, when someone states they voted multiple times it's not "real evidence."

This is a great microcosm of the left. The EXACT same things (media interviews, social media accounts of events) they use to defend their position in one instance they brush off as not "real evidence" in another.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAAASH
Oh ok....CLEEEEEARRRRRRRLY joking. Clearly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
09-11-2014 , 09:54 PM
JAAASH doesn't have the google on his internets, guys, no fair
09-11-2014 , 10:21 PM
JAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AASH
09-11-2014 , 10:27 PM
In for some


Spoiler:
JAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASH
09-11-2014 , 11:14 PM
3 A's in the screename is clearly the optimal number of A's. If it was JAASH, then JAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASHing wouldn't be a thing. If it were JAAAASH, that would be trying too hard. JAAASH is just right.

JAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASH
09-12-2014 , 05:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
3 A's in the screename is clearly the optimal number of A's. If it was JAASH, then JAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASHing wouldn't be a thing. If it were JAAAASH, that would be trying too hard. JAAASH is just right.

JAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASH
steeeeeeeeeeeelhouse refutes this hypothesis imo
09-12-2014 , 03:27 PM
Remember that guy who had the all male scotch and cigar fundraiser? Well he's wondering what's so bad about it, don't women have lingerie parties?

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/58123...ushpmg00000067
Quote:
Rep. Steve Southerland (R-Fla.) was criticized last week for hosting a male-only fundraiser in March, with his opponent Gwen Graham's campaign calling the event "offensive."

But Southerland laughed off the criticism to the Tampa Bay Times on Friday, comparing the event to a "lingerie party."

"I live with five women. That's all I'm saying. I live with five women," Southerland said. "Listen: Has Gwen Graham ever been to a lingerie shower? Ask her. And how many men were there?"
09-12-2014 , 03:41 PM
So Ted Cruz was at a Christian event basically saying that if you don't support Israel you're anti-American and proceeded to get booed to the point where he walks off stage.

He then comes back out and gives this brilliant soliloquy



Of course, Republicans are LOVING this.
09-12-2014 , 05:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ludacris
So Ted Cruz was at a Christian event basically saying that if you don't support Israel you're anti-American and proceeded to get booed to the point where he walks off stage.

He then comes back out and gives this brilliant soliloquy



Of course, Republicans are LOVING this.
Ted Cruz is a jack***

Quote:
Anti-Semitism among Christians, Arab and otherwise, is appalling, but it doesn’t sound like that’s what was at issue here. Ted Cruz came to this event apparently seeking to score points with a domestic US political constituencies at the expense of the desperate need for international Christian solidarity in the face of horrendous persecution by ISIS and other radical Islamic groups. To add to the insult, now Breitbart, a leading website of movement conservatism, questions the Christianity of these Arab men and women in that Washington room.

This is beyond infuriating. Arab Christians in the Middle East face persecution and death every day, simply because they are Christian. And this Dr. Susan Berry person on Breitbart distorts the truth — saying that Cruz was booed because he supported Israel, when in fact he was booed because he turned his speech into a pro-Israel lecture to a hostile audience — and then writes as if the only thing worth knowing about the Christians in that audience is that some of them had met with Hezbollah.

It was a disgusting smear by Berry and Breitbart, same as Alana Goodman’s smear in the WFB. I say that as someone who in no way shares the antipathy of these Christians for Israel. Five Christian patriarchs of persecuted Christian peoples came to the United States to meet and to talk about what their people are suffering, and these right-wing jackals, including Sen. Cruz, jumped them and tried to trash and exploit them for American political purposes.
http://www.theamericanconservative.c...ab-christians/
09-13-2014 , 10:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
Makes me like him even more.
09-13-2014 , 11:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
Remember that guy who had the all male scotch and cigar fundraiser? Well he's wondering what's so bad about it, don't women have lingerie parties?

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/58123...ushpmg00000067

#ADAPTING
09-13-2014 , 11:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeyB105
Makes me like him even more.
I guess the game of "Let's spot the Bigot" is over for today So early too!
09-13-2014 , 02:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeyB105
Makes me like him even more.
I'm curious why?

      
m