http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_867353.html

Ed Schultz calls Laura Ingraham a s*** with ZERO context.

Carbonite continues to advertise.

Rush uses context w/ S word in describing a 30 law student asking others to pay for her birth control.

Carbonite bails.


"control the media, control the message, control the masses" much here??

Yes, "much here." You've cracked the code. Clearly Carbonite is attempting to control the media and the masses, through liberal tricks of some kind, to get people to buy into ******ed overpriced data backup schemes most people can accomplish with a USB drive and 5 minutes of training on how to insert the thing into a USB port. All to accomplish control of the masses somehow, for some kind of dastardly liberal ends, of course. Now Ed Schultz has the coveted Carbonite advertisements all to himself, to the detriment of freedom loving Americans everywhere. The dots are all connected, I'm subscribing to this.

Do you have a citation that Carbonite advertises on Ed Schultz's show, or did you just make that up?

But far more important, assuming Carbonite does advertise on Ed Schultz and not Rush anymore, this proves what, exactly? Carbonite is...biased? Liberals did some kind of trick? The masses are now controlled? Pls advise.

Fluke is a Georgetown law student(T14) who will graduate in 2 months. The average FIRST YEAR starting salary after graduating Georgetown Law is $165,000.

She is the 1% of the 1% in this country and needs the government to pay for her sexual activities. Any other circumstance and you guys would be tearing this girl's head off. The OWSers on this forum would probably want her to pay double the price for the birth control plus a 70% tax.

Yeah, I'm going to need a citation on that one, too. Please quote someone.

Personally, I have no problem with Fluke getting her birth control covered on the insurance plan at her next job.

Silly question, is every girl who is on birth control sexually active?

Sign. . .she is not part of the 1%.

Yet I'm sure with his massive audience he didn't need to monopolize the data back up ads.

No, not at all.

No. A friend on mine (virgin till 25 when she got married) was on the pill since she was 16. I read an article earlier today where a mom was talking about all the flack her sexually inactive (I guess we have to trust her) was getting because she is on the pill and people are giving her **** because they are mini rush ditto heads.

Another anecdote. I remember hearing female comedians make the joke about how depressing it is to keep taking the pill everyday when they are single and not having sex.

Yeah, I though maybe my ex was just weird. She's been on the pill since she was 14, didn't loose her virginity till she was 20, and keeps taking the pill whether she's in a relationship or not.

ETA: Of course, she may have been a secret mooslim, kenyan, socialist, nympho sloot, athiest who was planted in WA by Osama Bin Pimp Daddy 25 years ago to **** with the hearts and minds of white middle class americans. That would be much more reasonable than a girl taking birth control while not in a sexual relationship...

Nah, she'll be doing document review for the 1% next year.

Cite which part?

1% = 3,000,000+ Americans.

Top of her class at a T14 law school with an expected 6 figure salary upon graduation? That's 1% of the 1%.

lol, so you think that despite whatever debt she might have as a result of going to Georgetown, she should get an advance on her expected 1st year salary, or something, to pay for her birth control before she even graduates and has a job? What kind of ******ed logic led to such a terrible post?

The last two sentences.

Hahahaha

Did you get this from a chain mail or a Facebook poast?

I have to work full time to attend night classes at my law school. I attend a top tier school, but certainly not T14. The taxes I pay to the fed this year will pay for her birth control.

I understand that in some instances birth control can be used for other purposes than simply to prevent pregnancy. I am perfectly fine with girls who are prescribed it for these purposes, but the fact remains that girls who use BC as a preventative measure against pregnancy are very much in the majority. I just can't believe that this girl, in her situation in life, can get on a pedestal and tell me to pay for her sexual proclivities.

I do not like Rush or anything he stands for, but I can see how a person can be so outraged at Fluke that this type of comment can slip out. When did everybody in this country lose their self independence?

No, no they wont.

She's not.

Just a general presumption made from reading past posts in the Occupy Wallstreet thread and this one. The word probably usually does not convey a statement of fact.

DCSmalls probably masturbates while watching little boys shower.

#notintendedtobeafactualstatement

Lol ok

That is what she is trying to accomplish though.

And you know this how?

Just because a few guys in this thread "know a chick" that takes BC for non-preventative reasons, doesn't discount that fact that the overwhelming majority of girls take BC so they don't get pregnant from having sex. I mean I understand Fluke is one ugly woman, but she's 30 years old and most likely sexually active. It isn't THAT incomprehensible to make that presumption. On another note, if she was taking birth control for some medical reason, I guarantee that would have come out by now.

Yeah no. In the U.S. the top 1% of the top 1% make $11 million a year. The top 1% make $386,000 per year, top 10% starts at $108,000.

So yeah, if she lands a fancy corporate job after law school, (which she inevitably will because obviously went to law school to make money and not fight for causes she believes in) she'll sit comfortably in the top 5-10%.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...of-income.html