Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ron Paul 2012 Containment Thread Ron Paul 2012 Containment Thread

01-18-2012 , 11:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sj2010
ITT Max Raker argues in support of the Austrian definition of deflation/inflation.
What are the differences between the Austrian and mainstream definitions of inflation?

Last edited by FlyWf; 01-18-2012 at 11:35 PM. Reason: spoiler alert: This sj guy has no idea what he's talking about
01-18-2012 , 11:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
What are the differences between the Austrian and mainstream definitions of inflation?
Austrian = increase/decrease in money supply

Mainstream = rising/falling prices. Politicians like this one because the negative effects of their monetary polices take longer to be seen. Also since, this definition is much harder to measure, its another reason its ******ed.
01-19-2012 , 12:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fluorescenthippo
Austrian = increase/decrease in money supply

Mainstream = rising/falling prices. Politicians like this one because the negative effects of their monetary polices take longer to be seen. Also since, this definition is much harder to measure, its another reason its ******ed.
Not sure why we are even talking about this. Clearly everybody ITT is using the mainstream definition.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LirvA
OMG WE CAN'T HAVE DEFLATION. THAT WOULD CAUSE OUR DOLLARS TO BE WORTH MORE AND PRICES TO COME DOWN, THAT WOULD BE ****ING HORRIBLE!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by spino1i
I mean inflation is definitely a tax on the rich, or really, anyone who's primary economic value is in their savings, not in their future economic output (such as a job). The poor at least get wage increases every year to pay for the increased prices of food and energy.
Of course inflation should be a measure of how prices change over time. That's what the word means and more importantly what people actually care about.
01-19-2012 , 01:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Raker
Not sure why we are even talking about this. Clearly everybody ITT is using the mainstream definition.
You said this earlier:

Quote:
Deflation involves a decrease in prices but all decreases in price are not deflation
Quote:
It certainly seems non trivial to me. Obv you should look across a broad range of goods and eliminate anything with an obvious non monetary reason for price changes. Similar to inflation calculations.
Sounds pretty Austrian to me, as per hippo's definitions.

We actually agree that separating the different causes of price fluctuations leads to a better economic analysis. That's the Austrians' point: they obviously don't deny the existence of the many mechanisms that affect the price level that fall under the mainstream definition of inflationary/deflationary forces, they just see it as counterproductive to describe them all with one label because of the separate diverse effects they have on the health of an economy.

I figured that's where clowntable was going. I apologize for either stealing his thunder or completely missing his point

Last edited by sj2010; 01-19-2012 at 01:19 AM.
01-19-2012 , 01:10 AM
Seeing people argue that deflation is bad never gets old.
01-19-2012 , 01:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
What are the differences between the Austrian and mainstream definitions of inflation?
spoiler alert: This sj guy has no idea what he's talking about
thats a pretty arrogant claim to make from a dude that just posted this gem:
Quote:
Uh, there's actually been massive inflation in the computers in the sense you're using it. You used to be able to buy $3,000 with a PC that had a 100 MHz processor. That same computer would be worth, oh, $3 today? You'd need 1000 of them to buy the same amount of dollars today as 1 computer could buy in 1995!
01-19-2012 , 01:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fluorescenthippo
Austrian = increase/decrease in money supply
Is this inflation?


01-19-2012 , 01:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jungle survivor
Is this inflation?
Dollar went up vs. a bunch of other fiat currencies, so what?
01-19-2012 , 01:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sj2010
Sounds pretty Austrian to me, as per hippo's definitions.
Everybody, including me, has implicitly (and in some cases explicitly) defined inflation/deflation as the broad increase/decreases in the prices of many goods. Exactly what he claimed the mainstream definition is. Sure...it sucks that it isn't easy to calculate, but we can't let that force us into an easy to determine definition for it that is wrong.

Quote:
We actually agree that separating the different causes of price fluctuations leads to a better economic analysis. That's the Austrians' point: they obviously don't deny the existence of the many mechanisms that affect the price level that fall under the mainstream definition of inflationary/deflationary forces, they just see it as counterproductive to describe them all with one label because of the separate diverse effects they have on the health of an economy.
Actually, as per hippos "Austrian" definition, inflation/deflation is a function of a single variable, money supply. Of course nobody itt actually used that definition when talking about inflation because it makes no sense in terms of intuitive definitions of what people have in mind when they say "inflation".
01-19-2012 , 02:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tzwien
Seeing people argue that deflation is bad never gets old.
I'm positive deflation being bad isn't much of an argument. It's pretty widely established that sustained deflation is disastrous for an economy.
01-19-2012 , 02:08 AM
Keynesian economics is also widely established.
01-19-2012 , 02:24 AM
am I just too ****ed up on percocet to use the god damn internet or are the mises forums down and unable to be posted on aorn?
01-19-2012 , 02:34 AM
my ****ing god this god damn mother ****ing **** I'm about to just ****ing say **** it god damn
01-19-2012 , 02:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ludacris
I'm positive deflation being bad isn't much of an argument. It's pretty widely established that sustained deflation is disastrous for an economy.
Deflation is similar to having a fever. The increase in body temperature isn't by itself that bad....it's just that when it happens it almost always means something is wrong.

You can make up ridiculous scenarios where there would be massive deflation and things would get alot better (somebody finds a way to cheaply turn dirt into oil etc) but when widespread deflation has actually been observed in modern economies it likely is caused by some underlying sickness.
01-19-2012 , 02:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LirvA
my ****ing god this god damn mother ****ing **** I'm about to just ****ing say **** it god damn
Quote:
Originally Posted by LirvA
am I just too ****ed up on percocet to use the god damn internet
My guess is yes.
01-19-2012 , 03:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmk
If you actually think this, then you're a complete idiot and I wouldn't trust you with even the most menial of tasks.

OTOH, the willingness of Obama apologists to just brush aside stuff like continued raining of death on the middle east and the assassination of US citizens, I weep for our future.



Yes, how convenient to be outraged that our country engages in the very terrorism that we disavow!



...Are you serious? You mean libertarians, whose primary concerns are (arguably) economic (taxes = theft) and militaristic (stop wars), were willing to give Obama a chance to do some good when he ran on removing troops from Iraq, but were still hesitant due to their taxation=theft ideals? GTFO! That's unheard of!

Suzzer, you're an idiot. You're disingenuous and a scumbag that tries to paint those who disagree with you as being of unsound mental health rather than simply having different views of the function of government. That you claim to think that brushing aside one's religious views is the equivalent of brushing aside the continuation of torture of prisoners is absurd.

I'm deciding to put you (and others like you) on ignore because you're completely incapable of having an adult conversation without taking things out of context or building up straw men.

I'll probably get tempbanned, but thats fine. Good day.
freak out more
01-19-2012 , 05:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jungle survivor
Is this inflation?


The dollar index is mainly an inverse Euro index.
01-19-2012 , 09:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tzwien
Seeing people argue that deflation is bad never gets old.
Yeah, when the value of your mortgage and all your assets start deflating, you will be on easy street.

If you don't understand why deflation is bad, you just might be an Austrian, and you certainly will be broke.
01-19-2012 , 09:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ludacris
You don't want deflation. The economy essentially stops.
hello
01-19-2012 , 09:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ludacris
You don't want deflation. The economy essentially stops.
you know we had deflation during the industrial revolution right?
01-19-2012 , 10:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zygote
you know we had deflation during the industrial revolution right?
+1 and most people make comments based upon the fact that they think their Econ 101 teacher and textbook were flawless.
01-19-2012 , 10:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopman20
+1 and most people make comments based upon the fact that they think their Econ 101 teacher and textbook were flawless.
Actually I think more people are making comments based on not even understanding their Econ 101 textbook.
01-19-2012 , 10:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zygote
you know we had deflation during the industrial revolution right?
We also had recessions and financial panics the entire time:

1869–70 recession
Panic of 1873 and the Long Depression
1882–85 recession
1887–88 recession
1890–91 recession
Panic of 1893
Panic of 1896
1899–1900 recession
1902–04 recession
Panic of 1907
Panic of 1910–1911

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._United_States
01-19-2012 , 10:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sj2010
thats a pretty arrogant claim to make from a dude that just posted this gem:
Uh, yeah, I'm right about that quote too? Inflation is when money gets cheaper.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sj2010
That's the Austrians' point: they obviously don't deny the existence of the many mechanisms that affect the price level that fall under the mainstream definition of inflationary/deflationary forces, they just see it as counterproductive to describe them all with one label because of the separate diverse effects they have on the health of an economy.
But they do describe them all with one label, and they think there's just one mechanism that affects inflation? Austrian inflation is much simpler and easier to calculate than mainstream inflation.

LOL you are so pretzeled up on this **** you forgot which side you were one.
01-19-2012 , 10:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Raker
Actually I think more people are making comments based on not even understanding their Econ 101 textbook.
Actually, I think most never took Econ 101.

      
m