Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ron Paul 2012 Containment Thread Ron Paul 2012 Containment Thread

10-18-2011 , 09:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zygote
the US has over 100 trillion of debt. what percent of that do you think is the war on drugs and the war on terror?

its important because perception and reality can often have huge margins between them.
Lol the US doesn't have over 100 trillion in debt. More like 1.4 trillion. Are you just gonna run around making up wild facts out of thin air? We already have one steelhouse for that thanks.
10-18-2011 , 10:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
Lol the US doesn't have over 100 trillion in debt. More like 1.4 trillion. Are you just gonna run around making up wild facts out of thin air? We already have one steelhouse for that thanks.
1.4 trillion? Closer to 15 trillion.

Zygote's number is real too though. Note the US unfunded liabilities counter on that page.
10-18-2011 , 10:15 AM
Well, no. I mean, 100 trillion is a real number*, but the US debt is not 100 trillion by any definition of "US" and "debt" that native English speakers would use.

*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_number
10-18-2011 , 10:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
**** i love RP.

give him his day in court and get all the facts on the table. america, **** yeah.

omg, if RP becomes president we can actually start saying 'america, **** yeah' and it won't be sarcastic, it'll be whenever civil liberties are upheld regardless of the religion of the accused.
Thought you were an anarchist?
10-18-2011 , 10:18 AM
isnt it 14 trillion?
10-18-2011 , 10:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Well, no. I mean, 100 trillion is a real number*, but the US debt is not 100 trillion by any definition of "US" and "debt" that native English speakers would use.

*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_number
If you sought to make the number as big as possible and you took the present value of all future government programs over an open-group population growth assumption and discounted them at treasury rates you could get a massive number. I mean, if you assume population/entitlement growth greater than long-term treasury rates and do this calculation then you get an infinite liability, which is why you usually see long-term entitlement valuations capped at 75 years or so.
10-18-2011 , 10:26 AM
This just in: exponential functions diverge as the independent variable goes to infinity.
10-18-2011 , 10:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AKSpartan
This just in: exponential functions diverge as the independent variable goes to infinity.
Correct - but to translate this to economics is to say "negative real interest rates are a bitch for long-term liabilities".
10-18-2011 , 11:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omar Comin
Thought you were an anarchist?
correct
10-18-2011 , 11:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by clowntable
Those journalists at the RP press conference for his plan didn't ask the greatest questions in the world (kinda hard to hear them in the video posted but that's assuming from the answers).

The one question that would be interesting is "how exactly would you phase out a government agency, pick one and explain the process". Now I haven't read the plan yet, just the cliffnotes but I don't think just closing the doors and fireing everyone on the spot is the way to go. It's the phaseout process I'm interested in.

Along the same lines I'd also like to see a question along the lines of "please explain the process of reintegrating military personal once all wars are ended, how do you think it would impact jobs markets etc., what criteria will you use to determine who will be picked to defend the country and who will be phased out of the military"

I think he should have a well prepared and debate ready phaseout plan for the next debate i.e. be able to explain phasing out one agancy in 90 seconds in simple terms.
he does mention in the press conference that one way is to just not replace employees that retire. And he mentions some dept functions going to other departments or back to the states, I think... maybe I'm off on that one.
10-18-2011 , 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by clowntable
Why did Paul release his plan now and not before the first debate? Wouldn't it have been easier to have the plan as a reference point during the debates?
the debates were just the opening moves, and were of little consequence. Perry errored in bringing the queen out before its prowess could ripen (his economic plan), and was hampered to protect it or abandon it, which hurt him. now that the opposition has settled on their courses of action, RP's queen is ready to play a larger (though still subserviant) role in promoting liberty and his campaign.
10-18-2011 , 12:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LirvA
isnt it 14 trillion?
Yeah my bad.
10-18-2011 , 02:36 PM
I didn't see anything in RP's plan about cutting income taxes. Must have been an oversight.
10-18-2011 , 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VayaConDios
I didn't see anything in RP's plan about cutting income taxes. Must have been an oversight.
he said he will work towards eliminating the personal income tax entirely.
10-18-2011 , 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VayaConDios
I didn't see anything in RP's plan about cutting income taxes. Must have been an oversight.
Deficits call for spending cuts or tax increases.
10-18-2011 , 02:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zygote
he said he will work towards eliminating the personal income tax entirely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scary_Tiger
Deficits call for spending cuts or tax increases.
He was pretty specific about immediately cutting the corporate income tax to 15%. If he can be specific about that, why can't he be specific about cutting the income tax?
10-18-2011 , 02:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VayaConDios
He was pretty specific about immediately cutting the corporate income tax to 15%. If he can be specific about that, why can't he be specific about cutting the income tax?
he doesnt want to reform it. he wants eliminate it. thats what he's going to do. he said so. its a matter of whether you trust that he's a man of his word.
10-18-2011 , 03:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VayaConDios
He was pretty specific about immediately cutting the corporate income tax to 15%. If he can be specific about that, why can't he be specific about cutting the income tax?
Cutting the corporate income tax is very popular on the GOP side. I think the justification is that it's a double tax, and that more jobs would come to America with it smaller.

Obviously it's tough to choose who to steal from, and Paul views any reduction in theft as a good reduction in theft.
10-18-2011 , 05:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scary_Tiger
Cutting the corporate income tax is very popular on the GOP side. I think the justification is that it's a double tax, and that more jobs would come to America with it smaller.

Obviously it's tough to choose who to steal from, and Paul views any reduction in theft as a good reduction in theft.
shouldn't be that tough. better to steal from millionaires than from the middle class.
10-18-2011 , 05:24 PM
Cavuto interview when they had "Ron Paul's Targets" and did those overhead maps of Dept. of Education et al. in the style of showing Iranian nuclear sites or such was awesome.
10-18-2011 , 06:07 PM
http://www.blackthisout.com/rally.php

Quote:
BLACK THIS OUT RALLY!
JOIN US IN NEW YORK CITY ON OCTOBER 19TH TO PROMOTE BLACK THIS OUT!


THIS IS A CALL TO ACTION: Ron Paul supporters, on October 19th, 2011 we will be holding a rally in New York City at 30 Rockefeller Plaza! We need YOU to help us build a HUGE presence to confront the press and send them a strong message - that we demand fair and unbiased media reporting during the 2012 Presidential Election!


ATTEND THE RALLY ON FACEBOOK RALLY UPDATES ON TWITTER



OPERATION MORNIN' DARLING: 6:00AM - 8:00AM
We need supporters to show up, the morning of October 19th, at 30 Rockefeller Plaza, so that we can organize to promote the Black THIS Out moneybomb on the morning shows! Show up well dressed, sunglasses at the ready and promotional signs cleverly prepared to be blacked out! Remember, we aren't always welcome, so don't make it too obvious that you are a Ron Paul supporter!

Our objective is to get free, national promotion on the LIVE morning shows!


OPERATION STREET SWEEP: 12:00PM - 5:00PM
For those available during the day, show up at 30 Rockefeller Plaza at the above times and be sure to sign in! We need volunteers to help us canvas the streets of New York City to identify Ron Paul supporters and get them to participate in our rally later in the evening!

Our objective will be to collect as many names, numbers, and e-mails as possible and work on getting these people out for our final rally point!


OPERATION TOO BIG TO FAIL: 5:00PM - 8:00PM
Join us at 30 Rockefeller Plaza for our final rally to proclaim to the media, Black THIS Out! We want to make our presence known, through peaceful, yet assertive means!

With your help, not only will the streets of NYC echo with the chants of "BLACK THIS OUT!", but the whole nation will hear it too! This day is for you, Ron Paul supporters! Capture it and help us make history!
Idk if you guys knew about this but if you're in NYC you should go
10-18-2011 , 07:40 PM
Both pretty good and the guys asking the questions actually seem to agree/sympathize with Paul.
10-18-2011 , 10:22 PM
New Ron Paul ad

Consistent

      
m