Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Racism on Campus Racism on Campus

12-01-2015 , 09:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Was curious, so did some quick googling. Some other stories:

Black guy threatens to kill black people at SVSU
White only/Black only signs done by black artist
Activist fakes facebook hack, gets FBI involved LOL
Black GVSU students writes hate speech on own white board

That'd be 5 cases, obviously there's a big issue with fake race 'crimes' on campus no? This took about 5 minutes, there are many more cases.
...

Looks like ikes has it all figured out, black people, so shut the **** up and vote Trump.
12-01-2015 , 09:45 PM
lol fly it's a stupid ****ing argument isn't it?
12-01-2015 , 10:44 PM
IKES seems like a smart guy he will get on the TRUMP train sooner than later.
12-01-2015 , 10:49 PM
ikes, even for you this is some tremendous intellectual dishonesty, unless you actually think that incidents of racism on campuses (reported or otherwise) do not dwarf incidents of activists faking threats, in which case lol, please proceed.
12-01-2015 , 10:51 PM
I made the exact same argument in this thread goofy that racism is some huge problem on campus. If that argument is valid, so is mine.
12-01-2015 , 11:03 PM
"exact same"

Hahahahahahaha
12-02-2015 , 10:21 AM
Yup goofy. Always funny to watch you flop about when someone else can't make the argument for you.
12-02-2015 , 12:24 PM
lol, me? You're the one making an argument here and it's been woefully inept so far. The two things you're asserting to be the same are not even close, you've done no work to demonstrate that they are, and the fact that you're trying to assert you're right anyway shows how pathetic your troll game is. You might have a better time in PU.
12-02-2015 , 12:30 PM
The whole point is the argument is horrible. Like that is the argument that was perfectly ok a few days ago, but use it to support something that doesn't fit your preconceived point of view and your ability to see a bad argument suddenly returns.
12-02-2015 , 12:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Like that is the argument that was perfectly ok a few days ago
Again, no, it's not, go back and do some work please, this is a sorry effort.
12-02-2015 , 12:41 PM
Indeed goofy, go back and read the thread
12-02-2015 , 02:10 PM
It's pretty hilarious for you to accuse me of "flopping around" while you sit here making hurr durr blind assertions, unable to back up your argument whatsoever. It shouldn't be hard for you to quote the posts where you're claiming people made the same argument you did, if they exist. I've already read the thread and I know how this will go, so please governor, proceed.
12-02-2015 , 02:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib
Who could possibly object to any of this other than whiny liberals demanding safe spaces lined with pillows and soothing music, amirite?
the quoted piece that made the list of things was in this post, but I don't care enough goofy. I'm just glad you realize that coming up with a list of a few things does not make an argument that it is a true problem. Seriously, go back to letting everyone else do the work for you and you can come in and chuckle like you had any part in it.
12-02-2015 , 02:20 PM
Yeah, there was a list of things, and...? iirc there was an entire Atlantic piece behind that, are you going to be quoting anything else or is that one paragraph the entire argument of the article as best as you know?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
but I don't care enough goofy.
Hahaha, you obviously care a lot given how much effort you put into creating a fake argument that you could use to fall flat on your face trying to expose LIBRUL HYPOCRISY. I'm not surprised to see you backing down though, good show as always.
12-10-2015 , 01:40 PM
Someone needs to educate the regressive left pussies running the Citadel on what it means to free speech.

'Suspension proceedings' begin after photos of Citadel cadets in white hoods posted online
12-10-2015 , 01:54 PM
Pretty sure military rules are different. Try again
12-10-2015 , 02:05 PM
The Citadel is an accredited university funded by the state (that's been very, very important to ikes when discussing previous issues) with a student body that is 1/3 civilian, do we know if those are soldiers or not?

If they weren't, how would you feel about this ikes?
12-10-2015 , 02:06 PM
If 1A protections were violated it'd be wrong. How could you possibly feel differently?
12-10-2015 , 02:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
If 1A protections were violated it'd be wrong. How could you possibly feel differently?
LOLOL ikes is playing "we don't know enough about the case yet to know how I would feel"

Bro rape = "RIGHTS ARE BEING VIOLATED", KKK dress-up = "we should wait for all the facts"
12-10-2015 , 02:55 PM
You literally just laid out a case that these kids weren't subject to military rule. If that's true, then these kids have 1A protections.

As to the other parts of your post, that's pathetic bull****, even from you.
12-10-2015 , 03:00 PM
So if those students were civilians then you would object to them being suspended for wearing KKK hoods?

If this question sounds redundant in the face of your last post, I apologize, but with you it's kind of important to make sure that's actually what you're saying before we get accused of lying about it later.
12-10-2015 , 03:46 PM
Public colleges are not allowed to suspend students for the racist speech because racist speech is protected by the first amendment. Do you really not agree with that?
12-10-2015 , 04:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Public colleges are not allowed to suspend students for the racist speech because racist speech is protected by the first amendment. Do you really not agree with that?
If they are suspended, it could technically be for reasons other than racist speech.
12-10-2015 , 04:32 PM
No one would dispute that.
12-13-2015 , 12:06 PM
http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=7075

A sorority raising money for pediatric cancer was deemed to be a microaggression by Black Lives Matter protesters at Kansas University. The protesters implied that the sorority cared more about philanthropy than black people.

According to the article, the protesters are seeking “multicultural counselors”, “mandatory 'inclusion and belonging’ training for students and faculty", and converting the university into a "safe space."

      
m