Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

03-03-2017 , 08:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan
What is the basis for this personal attack?
They don't like getting owned by people who they consider beneath them.
03-03-2017 , 09:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan
You are a liar. Feel free to search my posts for Trump to read my views on him, as well who I supported in the general election.
Or you could not search your posts and discover in this thread you were FIRED UP, not by truefish, not by BroadwaySushy, and certainly not by anything Trump or his administration did.


No, what fired ole' Hillary voting, BLM dance party Dan was the liberal "hypocrisy" of Wookie

1) Not complaining about Obama's bad but not as bad as Trump's deportations
2) While liberally complaining about Trump's much much worse deportation policy

Not like Dan. Who followed the much less hypocritical stance of

1) Not complaining about Obama's deportations
2) Also not complaining about Trump's
3) But complaining about how liberals shouldn't criticize Trump
03-03-2017 , 09:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
They don't like getting owned by people who they consider beneath them.
Lookie Dan seems like this Trump voter has mistaken you for a fellow traveler. Oh boy am on the edge of my seat at the furious rage you're going to drop on him, seeing how personal and 0-to-100 you get with center-left allies. Funny how this keeps happening to you, not just from your enemies to the center who are paid by David Brock to smear the brave progressive Ron Paul revolution.

Almost as if you ****ing voted for Trump and everyone knows it.
03-03-2017 , 09:08 PM
Earlier today in chezland (sadly the post was deleted so I can't quote it), NoQuarter (deplorable Trumpkin) asked his fellow conservative Trump-supporting friends why they still post in a forum where typical lefty mods are taking over. He addressed this question to Sushy, mongidig, wil, and...HastenDan.

He even has the conservative posters thinking he supports Trump.
03-03-2017 , 09:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by truefish
Not our problem. Can't save everybody.
Who's this "our" you speak of?


Quote:
Originally Posted by weeeez
u sound anxious trufish
Quote:
Originally Posted by truefish
That all you got?

That's all he needs. And we both know why. Even for stupid sociopaths like yourself, there are things that keep you up at night. At this point you people are praying trump gets impeached and this whole thing goes away ASAP. The longer it gets drawn out, the better chance cowards like you have of meeting a coward's fate.

Good luck.

Last edited by 5ive; 03-03-2017 at 09:16 PM.
03-03-2017 , 09:10 PM
03-03-2017 , 09:34 PM
i keep telling you guys they're bots
03-03-2017 , 09:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
Btw I found out the hard way you can't get Global Entry with a DUI (at least not until after 10 years). I filled out the form online but totally missed the distinction between "Have you ever been convicted of a crime" and the usual "Have you ever been convicted of a felony?" that you get on job applications. I found out after I got preliminarily approved but before going to the appointment that I was probably screwed.

But I went to the appointment anyway. So the dude asks me about being convicted of a crime. I tell him about the DUI, and he says basically that it has to be 10 years old. Ok, fine that's what I figured.

THEN - he takes my finger and thumb prints. Awesome. So now CBP has my fingerprints, and on their record that I've applied for Global Entry and been denied. Just super. Can't wait until they ask for my social media passwords to let me back into the country.

Are you sure about the 10 years timeline? I had a DUI 12 years ago and have my Global Entry interview next month. People have told me different things wrt DUI
03-03-2017 , 09:58 PM
Denver prosecutor had to dismiss 4 cases because witness wouldn't testify for fear of deportation.

http://www.9news.com/news/local/poli...ases/415790173
03-03-2017 , 09:59 PM
Not directly adressing the derpbot, but,

https://www.google.com/search?q=obam...utf-8&oe=utf-8


Quote:
Originally Posted by truefish
How many people did Obama deport? How many people did he drone? We're you bitching then?
03-03-2017 , 10:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by noseeds99
Are you sure about the 10 years timeline? I had a DUI 12 years ago and have my Global Entry interview next month. People have told me different things wrt DUI
Dude i interviewed with said 7 years for misdemeanor crimes. Something tells me they're not all on the same page.
03-03-2017 , 10:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Or you could not search your posts and discover in this thread you were FIRED UP, not by truefish, not by BroadwaySushy, and certainly not by anything Trump or his administration did.


No, what fired ole' Hillary voting, BLM dance party Dan was the liberal "hypocrisy" of Wookie

1) Not complaining about Obama's bad but not as bad as Trump's deportations
2) While liberally complaining about Trump's much much worse deportation policy

Not like Dan. Who followed the much less hypocritical stance of

1) Not complaining about Obama's deportations
2) Also not complaining about Trump's
3) But complaining about how liberals shouldn't criticize Trump
You mischaracterize reality. Wookie made a claim he was outraged at Obama's deportations. I checked his claim and found no such proof. I asked for such proof. Nothing.

Feel free to post any of my posts supporting Trump. I am afraid when you will find no such praise towards his administration in my posting. Sorry liar

Remember when you had a meltdown and admitted how wrong you are and how you don't know anything? Maybe take your own words to heart Fly I would say more, but we all know the result of that.
03-03-2017 , 10:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Earlier today in chezland (sadly the post was deleted so I can't quote it), NoQuarter (deplorable Trumpkin) asked his fellow conservative Trump-supporting friends why they still post in a forum where typical lefty mods are taking over. He addressed this question to Sushy, mongidig, wil, and...HastenDan.

He even has the conservative posters thinking he supports Trump.
Noquarter is famously a Sandy hook truther as well.
03-03-2017 , 10:25 PM
Don't remember seeing it here but this morning the talking heads were saying the reason the other members of the Armed Services Committee haven't had private meetings with the Russian Ambassador is because you don't do that as part of your duties with the ASC. You might meet with members of the military leadership of other countries, but not ambassadors. US Foreign Relations Committee are the guys who would conceivably meet with a foreign ambassador (and it would be on the books and for a specific purpose).

And if said ambassador is known to be their chief spy and top recruiter, you might want to shy away from him altogether... or you know... invite him as your guest to your party's convention... whatever's clever.
03-03-2017 , 10:35 PM
Is trump not worried because Comey is in his back pocket and won't release anything/already buried evidence? I would think that's large reason for so many leaks is people know corruption goes so high up and only chance to sink this ship.
03-03-2017 , 10:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dudeoflife
Is trump not worried because Comey is in his back pocket and won't release anything/already buried evidence? I would think that's large reason for so many leaks is people know corruption goes so high up and only chance to sink this ship.
House intel chair was on trump's transition team so lol @ that one.

Senate intel chair has defended trump hard already before it started.

Schiff (the house dem on this) doesn't seem credible either though fwiw, I have no idea what's going on internally other than the obvious cluster****.

Like every single one of the people that are in positions to investigate or prosecute has some god damn tie into the administration, even boente (the guy under sessions) does. There's conspiracies within these conspiracies.

Comey might not be in trump's pocket but everyone else might be.

The whataboutism out there is rampant and I'm already sick of it.

Last edited by wheatrich; 03-03-2017 at 10:47 PM.
03-03-2017 , 10:56 PM
The idea that Obama was a mass reporter is false anyways:

http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/...n_the_dep.html

Cliffs is that Obama used the formal deportation process more than anyone, but drastically scaled back use of the more common informal deportation process.
03-03-2017 , 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan
I checked his claim and found no such proof.
lol, this is a lie.

Last edited by MrWookie; 03-03-2017 at 11:10 PM. Reason: Or gross negligence. Not like Hillary's extreme carelessness, but actually something resembling gross negligence.
03-03-2017 , 11:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheatrich
House intel chair was on trump's transition team so lol @ that one.

Senate intel chair has defended trump hard already before it started.

Schiff (the house dem on this) doesn't seem credible either though fwiw, I have no idea what's going on internally other than the obvious cluster****.

Like every single one of the people that are in positions to investigate or prosecute has some god damn tie into the administration, even boente (the guy under sessions) does. There's conspiracies within these conspiracies.

Comey might not be in trump's pocket but everyone else might be.

The whataboutism out there is rampant and I'm already sick of it.
Why do you say Schiff doesn't seem credible? Every time I've heard him talk he just seems frustrated with Comey and Nunes, neither of whom seem willing to cooperate.
03-03-2017 , 11:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan
What is the basis for this personal attack?

The fact that there is something so wrong with your brain you chose to describe it as a 'personal attack' is probably a good place to start looking.
03-03-2017 , 11:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by m_reed05
Why do you say Schiff doesn't seem credible? Every time I've heard him talk he just seems frustrated with Comey and Nunes, neither of whom seem willing to cooperate.
same
03-03-2017 , 11:10 PM
Did anyone catch Maddow tonight? I only caught the very end, but it seemed like new info about trump's and a russian oligarch's planes constantly showing up at the same airports at the same time during the campaign. Including at some podunk tiny airport in one of the Carolinas.
03-03-2017 , 11:14 PM
Evidently there was another extremely painful Carter Page interview with Anderson Cooper tonight as well.
03-03-2017 , 11:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by noseeds99
Are you sure about the 10 years timeline? I had a DUI 12 years ago and have my Global Entry interview next month. People have told me different things wrt DUI
Yeah he was pretty clear about that. You should be ok if everything else goes well. You aren't one of those people that cops reflexively hate are you?
03-03-2017 , 11:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymmv
Dude i interviewed with said 7 years for misdemeanor crimes. Something tells me they're not all on the same page.
Mine was very clear that it's 10. But yeah maybe they're just making **** up.

      
m