Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Both are correct. The tweet is a written answer, the Franken-Sessions exchange was verbal testimony.
so the written question is different than the oral one?
kills the argument right here as there are no records (that we know of) of the conversations.
I feel its way too easy to deflect the oral answer by a *out of context* defense.
Im reading about it and watching the news and to me its not clear.
I just want to add that whatever brings these guys down is good to me but I feel a fail here.