Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

12-12-2018 , 08:21 PM
Look at these *******s (more in thread)


https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1072588457845972993
12-12-2018 , 08:21 PM
Setting aside NSA considerations


I don’t want him to die

I want humiliation.

Impeachment. Family goes to jail. We find out he’s broke


**** that guy.
12-12-2018 , 08:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllTheCheese
Winning an open seat in Arizona against a strong candidate is at least as good an indicator as losing an incumbent seat in Florida against an inexplicably popular sitting governor imo.
It's an indication that Arizona may be more likely to go blue than Florida in the near term.

I'd argue that very few resources should be spent in Florida in 2020. There's not even a down ballot senate race that year unless Scott or Rubio die/resign unexpectedly in the next two years.
12-12-2018 , 08:33 PM
Trump won Florida by 1.2% in 2016. In 2018, Scott won by 0.12%, DeSantis won by 0.4%.

Not sure how comparable they are but it doesn't seem like the state has gone more red since 2016. It's still a tossup.
12-12-2018 , 08:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
It's an indication that Arizona may be more likely to go blue than Florida in the near term.

I'd argue that very few resources should be spent in Florida in 2020. There's not even a down ballot senate race that year unless Scott or Rubio die/resign unexpectedly in the next two years.
My response is:

Quote:
Originally Posted by synth_floyd
Trump won Florida by 1.2% in 2016. In 2018, Scott won by 0.12%, DeSantis won by 0.4%.

Not sure how comparable they are but it doesn't seem like the state has gone more red since 2016. It's still a tossup.
This + re-enfranchisement of former felons, which probably favors Democrats (cue rightwinger quoting my post with some hurrr durrr comment).
12-12-2018 , 09:14 PM
12-12-2018 , 09:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by synth_floyd
Trump won Florida by 1.2% in 2016. In 2018, Scott won by 0.12%, DeSantis won by 0.4%.

Not sure how comparable they are but it doesn't seem like the state has gone more red since 2016. It's still a tossup.
In the most important midterm election of my lifetime, the state of Florida said: "Let's throw out our incumbent who is largely opposing the Trump agenda. I want the Trumpist."

R+1.2 in 2016 to R+0.1 in 2018 is PATHETIC for an incumbent.

PA/WI/MI/ME/MN all had D incumbent senators in states that were also very close for Trump in 2016. All of them won reelection by at least 5 points.

NV and AZ flipped. OH/MT/WV went big time for Trump 2016, but still kept their D incumbents.

Florida is a pretty unique failure here.
12-12-2018 , 09:47 PM
Does nobody here remember 2010?
12-12-2018 , 09:52 PM
Florida has a lot of olds, uneducated and rurals
12-12-2018 , 09:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
In the most important midterm election of my lifetime, the state of Florida said: "Let's throw out our incumbent who is largely opposing the Trump agenda. I want the Trumpist."

R+1.2 in 2016 to R+0.1 in 2018 is PATHETIC for an incumbent.

PA/WI/MI/ME/MN all had D incumbent senators in states that were also very close for Trump in 2016. All of them won reelection by at least 5 points.

NV and AZ flipped. OH/MT/WV went big time for Trump 2016, but still kept their D incumbents.

Florida is a pretty unique failure here.
It is unique in that Donald Trump has negative net approvals in all the other states you mention, but not Florida where he is like +2 net approval. That goes to your point, but that number is not even close to insurmountable. You're writing off Florida because of your feels, basically. We're talking about recent electoral margins all within about 1 point.

When you say "don't spend any money on Florida," (1) being outspent is probably why Bill Nelson lost, and (2) you're saying the money we would spend in Florida is worth more than the ~10+ expected value of electoral votes gained by running a serious campaign there.
12-12-2018 , 10:01 PM
there are worse options

12-12-2018 , 10:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman220
Meh, not really the same. An incumbent lost in Florida. That did not happen in AZ/OH/MT/WV.
Rick Scott was basically an incumbent, too.
12-12-2018 , 10:06 PM
Lmao I laughed pretty hard lol yeswecanseco
12-12-2018 , 10:10 PM
literally everything, everything from the last two years was worth it if Hannity ends up behind bars. He's the real whale here.
12-12-2018 , 10:11 PM
who's gonna tell her?

12-12-2018 , 10:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllTheCheese
It is unique in that Donald Trump has negative net approvals in all the other states you mention, but not Florida where he is like +2 net approval. That goes to your point, but that number is not even close to insurmountable. You're writing off Florida because of your feels, basically. We're talking about recent electoral margins all within about 1 point.
I'll confess that's probably part of it. But certainly not the whole story.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AllTheCheese
When you say "don't spend any money on Florida," (1) being outspent is probably why Bill Nelson lost, and (2) you're saying the money we would spend in Florida is worth more than the ~10+ expected value of electoral votes gained by running a serious campaign there.
Yes, I'm saying exactly that.

Remember, we not only need the presidency to get anything serious done, we need to take the senate too. To maximize what we need to get done, focus should be on close states where we could get both a senate seat and electoral votes.

I'm not saying spend absolutely no money in Florida, but it should be considerably down the priority list. Certainly behind all of CO/IA/AZ/ME/NC. Maybe even GA too.
12-12-2018 , 10:21 PM
Obamacare got through without control of both legislatures
12-12-2018 , 10:31 PM
Ohio Senate seat wasn't seriously contested by the gop. Ohio governors race is a better barometer of the current environment in Ohio, and the R won handily.

FL is significantly more likely to go blue in 2020 than Ohio.
12-12-2018 , 10:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
there are worse options

Guaranteed, in two years, we'd have the swollest cabinet in the world.
12-12-2018 , 10:43 PM
Lawyers,

Why is the judge today in Cohen’s sentencing still saying individual one when it’s been formally linked to trump in other legal proceedings?

Why do they keep up the facade?
12-12-2018 , 10:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
there are worse options

Goddamn, Canseco is still trying to make "Bash Brother" a thing, that dude is committing to the bit in a major way.
12-12-2018 , 10:52 PM
Bash Brother is so old too. Shelley Duncan was doing it on the Yankees 10 years ago and he was the bat boy for the A's at the time lol.
12-12-2018 , 11:04 PM
I remember when I was a wee lad going out to the ball game and watching Canseco and McGuire try to make the bash a thing.
12-12-2018 , 11:05 PM
Bash Brothers and Canseco's 40/40 was pretty close to peak late-80s baseball right up there with that fat pitcher for the Dodgers Fernando Venezuela.
12-12-2018 , 11:55 PM
Not Canseco, but possibly someone more disgraced than Canseco:


      
m