Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
What does that have to do with anything? Even if you take those votes away, she still got another 1.5 million more.
Yeah, this whole blaming Stein/Johnson voters for Hillary losing thing is silly as ****.
Let's look at the list of
close races from Wikipedia and see which of these Stein stole from Hillary.
Michigan(16): Trump 2,279,543, ClintonStein 2,320,302, swings to Clinton assuming none of Johnson's 172,136 voters would have voted for Trump
Pennsylvania(20): Trump 2,970,733, ClintonStein 2,976,382, same deal as Michigan because Johnson got 146,715 votes
Wisconsin(10): Trump 1,405,284, ClintonStein 1,413,608, same as the previous two because Johnson got 106,674 votes
Florida(29): Trump 4,617,886, ClintonStein 4,569,374, Trump wins regardless of Stein voters
Nebraska's 2nd congressional district(1): Trump 137,564, ClintonStein 134,377, Trump wins regardless of Stein voters
Arizona(11): Trump 1,252,401, ClintonStein 1,195,512, Trump wins regardless of Stein voters
North Carolina(15): Trump 2,362,631, ClintonStein 2,201,421, Trump wins regardless of Stein
or Johnson voters
Georgia(16): Trump 2,089,104, ClintonStein 1,885,637, Trump wins regardless of Stein
or Johnson voters
Ohio(18): Trump 2,841,005, ClintonStein 2,440,435, Trump wins regardless of Stein
or Johnson voters
Texas(38): Trump 4,685,047, ClintonStein 3,949,426, Trump wins regardless of Stein
or Johnson voters
Iowa(6): Trump 800,983, ClintonStein 665,148, Trump wins regardless of Stein
or Johnson voters
So Jill Stein cost Clinton the election if you assume that
all of Jill Stein's voters would have switched to Clinton and
none of Gary Johnson's would have switched to Trump.